Kangana vs. Deepika - who is more versatile? - Page 8

Originally posted by: briahna

oh and i can see some bringing khans in this topic now.

well well well..:

kangana delivered without khans, blockbusters, NA awards...and epic dhulai she did with manikarnika to bollywood gang bangs!! movie with huge budget, almost 0 promotion, director fled, sonu fled, many others fled, we all thought chalo kangu ki naiyaa dobh gayi

now that did not happen. movie did not crash, took nose dive, movie is average, but how many times we see movie doing steady business cos of such an epic performance from the lead actor.

now those who fled are crying ...dhoka...and then kangu lands from swiz and shuts all , and now all are looking like a joke. and movie is not a FLOPPY as we IF'rs were praying for, and kjo is hiding too. oh btw...my gut feeling says kalank might tank. so manikarnika at best will be average ...acha chalo below average

btw...kangu has three STAINless NA, i know i know, some will come up with baseless arguments that her NA are stained...but how many does deepu have? ek stained NA bhi nahi milli?

oh i see...bechaari Top brand hain. ok chalu issi seh dil koh shanti karen: i am the TOP brand of bollywood.

Originally posted by: ThunderLight

99% of your comment is not related to the topic. Acting with Khans or no Khans has nothing to do with Talent. Even with Khans, those like Kajol, Rani, Alia, Anushka and Deepika have shown their talent.

If you want to go by making it "without" Big names, then nobody else is Bigger than Vidya Balan. She neither had a Sugar Daddy boyfriend like Aditya Pancholi nor did she do a single film with Big wigs like Karan Johar/Khans/Sanjay Dutt/AjayDevgan/Akshay/Hrithik.

And she does not need to create controversies or put others down to stay relevant.