Predators taking about 'me too'..irony!!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

745671

Suspended

Posted: 6 years ago

#31

I believed her too but she says so many crazy things that I don't really know anymore. Initially I believed it must be real because why would she go all guns blazing against a powerful actor for no reason? It logically didn't make sense.

But Kangana is not a logical person I realize now. 😆

Still though, who knows. These things always end up being he said, she said. People believe whatever they want to believe because there will never be any great proof from either side.

Edited by anonymous39 - 6 years ago

Quote

tina

@tina59

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 6 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: Nova19

No matter how many times someone claims the police could have made her give up her devices, it still won't be true because the Indian legal code doesn't allow women to be charged with harassment No charges, no warrant but no charges doesn't mean no guilt. If he were guilty she would have wanted the police to investigate instead of stonewalling the police.

Everything that you claimed in your earlier post as evidence she isn't a stalker happened before or during 2013. At no time has Hrithik ever claimed she was inappropriate, until the very last schedule of K3 (which he ignored as drunken mistake then), until 2014 when the real harassment begin. How was he supposed to know what would happen, before it happened?

The AKA performance of Her Story (version 10.34) was a wonder, no doubt. Unfortunately it isn't compatible with earlier or later versions of her story. If she was telling the truth then she's lied before and after. If she's telling anything like the truth why does she lie, and lie, and lie, and lie?

Again its perspective, what I saw I believe. I haven't heard from Hrithik and honestly I find it hard to believe that he didn't have an affair with her. He did and not for the first time.

Doesn't matter, Hrithik had filed a criminal complaint and hired a criminal lawyer which means they could have obtained a warrant under criminal offense.

If the police wants something they can get it

he didn't have any case period.

when he himself said she sent mails to USA imposter and challenged that he would produce him , his dad promised to expose her. what happened ???

where is the proof ????

in the end , its who you chose to believe , I believe Kangna when she says they had an affair. why is Hrithik not admitting they had an affair, the very fact he is lying on that shows who is lying

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: tina59

Again its perspective, what I saw I believe. I haven't heard from Hrithik and honestly I find it hard to believe that he didn't have an affair with her. He did and not for the first time.

Doesn't matter, Hrithik had filed a criminal complaint and hired a criminal lawyer which means they could have obtained a warrant under criminal offense.

If the police wants something they can get it

he didn't have any case period.

when he himself said she sent mails to USA imposter and challenged that he would produce him , his dad promised to expose her. what happened ???

where is the proof ????

in the end , its who you chose to believe , I believe Kangna when she says they had an affair. why is Hrithik not admitting they had an affair, the very fact he is lying on that shows who is lying

It's not perspective. If someone says A happened. Then the same person says the opposite of A happened. It is not a matter of perspective. The person is lying at least one of those 2 times. I can give you example after example of her directly contradicting herself. That is not a matter of perspective.

Hrithik sent a private legal notice which is NOT a criminal complaint. She leaked it and created the whole public battle. He did submit a complaint against a suspected imposter because she and Rangoli told him someone claiming to be him had sent her emails and there must be an imposter and he (at first) believed them. Eventually, after she accused him very publicly of many things which he actually could have gone to jail for if they were true, he sent a formal statement to the police to protected himself from her accusations. Indian laws are sexist so it IS NOT POSSIBLE to obtain a warrant for a crime which legally does not exist. Again, in India a woman CANNOT be charged with sexually harassing a man.

They DID expose her for anyone capable of recognizing what she is.

If Kangana wants to come out and claim they had a brief sexual encounter (about the ONLY claim she has NEVER made), I will admit there might be no evidence. Since instead she has claimed a serious relationship with talk of marriage spanning years and has not one iota of proof, I feel very comfortable saying I don't believe her. The fact that she tried to pass off a party picture as an intimate moment proves her integrity level and the fact that she saved that picture (a grainy drunken group picture lovingly cropped to just the two of them to fuel her phantasy) for literally years proves she would have kept anything, any token no matter how small, if she'd ever had anything to keep.

Quote

1146481

Suspended

Posted: 6 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: Nova19

If she is telling the truth she could have easily proven it by supplying her phone and laptop and helping the police investigation instead of stonewalling. Unfortunately, because there was technically no crime in Hrithik's detailed and official statement to the police (since a woman can do absolutely positively anything to a man and not be legally charged with sexual harassment) the police had no grounds to compel her to cooperate. A man can be charged with sexual harassment but she has only ever alleged Hrithik is guilty in interviews despite claiming an awful lot like stalking, harassing, hacking her accounts, etc Kangana has never officially lodged a complaint. Kind of interesting...she was so amazingly hurt by him that she can't stop attacking him 4-5 years later, but not so hurt she can't file a police complaint?

Complaint for what? Having a (imaginary) affair or engagement? Not responding to her? Breaking up with her? Is it even a Crime?

Quote

1146481

Suspended

Posted: 6 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: ponymo

Obviously taking a legal recourse is up to the victim. If s/he doesn't come forward, then there's no grounds to investigate.

Sending unsolicited nudes and other objectionable content is harassment, so Hrithik could have complained against her. In such a case, it would have compelled her to co-operate. But he didn't.

The only reason she is not booked is because Indian Laws have no law for "Stalking by Women". This flawed one sided law also needs to be upgraded keeping with the times.

So just because she is free does not mean people support whatever she is doing. She should be made to understand that what she is doing is criminal and harassment. She should not misuse her gender by constantly using this issue just before her film is up for release. I also think she does have some mental health issues. It is not as if she is the only one who did not get her feelings reciprocated? I dont even think she ever genuinely liked the man. All she seemed to like was the Media attention she could get if she was linked to him. Consent seems immaterial to her.

Edited by ThunderLight - 6 years ago

Quote

TheRager

@TheRager

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#36

Kangana has come up the hard way. It is very difficult for daddy's boys like Hrithik or Ayudhman to take her on and survive. But if they have proofs they should use all their contacts and take the legal route. But be very careful as whoever help they take should be someone really powerful otherwise she is capable of pulling down whoever is helping them.

Quote

1103978

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: TheRager
Kangana has come up the hard way. It is very difficult for daddy's boys like Hrithik or Ayudhman to take her on and survive. But if they have proofs they should use all their contacts and take the legal route. But be very careful as whoever help they take should be someone really powerful otherwise she is capable of pulling down whoever is helping them.

If these guys had proofs, they would have done the legal route long ago... they have got nothing. Otherwise why would someone not take any legal action?

Quote

TheRager

@TheRager

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: 4thPrincoholic

If these guys had proofs, they would have done the legal route long ago... they have got nothing. Otherwise why would someone not take any legal action?

At times guys are ashamed to admit they were harassed. There is a stigma against men speaking up if they are victims of women.

Quote

1146481

Suspended

Posted: 6 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: TheRager
Kangana has come up the hard way. It is very difficult for daddy's boys like Hrithik or Ayudhman to take her on and survive. But if they have proofs they should use all their contacts and take the legal route. But be very careful as whoever help they take should be someone really powerful otherwise she is capable of pulling down whoever is helping them.

Nana Patekar came from slums and was a outsider. He did not have a priviledged background like Kangana whose family is very politically influential and rich. Unlike Kangana, he never had a Sugar Daddy like Aditya Pancholi. He is talented and went on to win many National awards.

THAT is not used as an excuse to justify his alleged actions towards Tanushree. So, same yardstick should be applied against Kangana too.

When a woman says NO, you are supposed to back off. Same applies if the gender is reversed too.

Anybody who does not understand this simple thing is promoting Sexual Harassment. And needs to be ashamed of themselves.

Edited by ThunderLight - 6 years ago

Quote

1103978

Hibernated

Posted: 6 years ago

#40

Originally posted by: TheRager

At times guys are ashamed to admit they were harassed. There is a stigma against men speaking up if they are victims of women.

Hrithik doesn't come off as someone who is ashamed nor is the case with Ayudhman since they have both spoken out multiple times... So I highly doubt that's the case. Though I do agree about the stigma bit. Not so sure if that's the case with these two. But if they really have a case, they should have gone the legal route long ago. Better late than never...They can still do it. Just don't know if they have any solid proof.

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

Predators taking about 'me too'..irony!! - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics