Did Aishwarya take a Sly dig at Alia Bhatt?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

WinterAesthetics

@DanceUntilWeDie

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#201

Originally posted by: Justmoi
Shah got Suhana a Vogue cover. He's being a good father and best excuse of all he was building a resume for Julliard.🤣
Shah dropped Ash without any explanation, probably being a coward, kissing Bhai's ass IDK the entire story, but hey he can do so, producer.

KJO nepotism ki raja, thrusts Aloo, called out. Must be hormones.

This woman survived Bhai's abuse, the industry would have cast her out were it not for something she had. Everything she achieved she got on her own. But hey club her with her useless husband to put her down.

Her achievements are her own. She stands apart because of that. The Vogue covers, her own. HW offers, her own. She made some stupid choices, but she is where she is because she worked for it. No f**king Godfather. She can say whatever she wants. She has earned it.

Best f**kING answer! 👏.

Aish is selfmade.

Also she has worked in more languages than just Hindi and English . So it's beyond hw and bw.

I wonder if aloo even ever had to go for an audition or lobby for a role or go to meet someone for a script session .

Kjo seems to be literally pouring all scripts in her lap.

Quote

1140816

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#202

How come none of u complain when Kjo gives films to Siddharth Malhotra? Or YRF gives films to Vaani? Why target only Alia? It is clear that u care two hoots about "Talent" but are actually Jealous of the success of Alia. 😆

Edited by BlackPanther7 - 7 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

TheekThaak

@TheekThaak

Rocker

Posted: 7 years ago

#203

Originally posted by: SrideviFan4ever

Answer lies in your own question. Anything innovative and inclusive stops when you slowly stop outsiders from entering your industry and distribute work amongst your own kith and kin and the already established, within the industry. Nepotism is much beyond just actors and actresses. Most of the people are insiders here. Be it future star kids who work as ADs on big film sets (who have no intention to direct) or musicians like Amaal and Armaan Malik who always get the upper hand (Look at the recent IIFA awards where Amaal, Tanishq Bagchi and someone else won best music award for BKD and they only showed Amaal talking about his famous dad and Kjo while Tanishk's segment was edited out when actually the most famous song of BKD till now has been by hime-Tamma Tamma). Lyrics are still written by the same people who have always written for songs like Javed Akhtar,etc. There's no scope for outsiders breaking into non acting departments in big films.

People like Zoya Akhtar and Farhan Akhtar get to assist directors like Mira Nair and cinematographers like Manmohan Singh for a big film like Lamhe. Same goes with fashion designers,art directors,etc. Everyone initially looks like an outisder but with time you slowly find out most of them are related to someone or the other in the industry. Starkids like Janhvi and Suhana are put on big magazine covers over well known models, these insiders are launched as glamour queens so what else can you expect when the industry itself doesn't allow actors to audition and get a chance to act in big films? Obviously it'll come down to only fashion and glamour.

Not saying that the industry is filled with only insiders but recently in the last few years, the ratio between insiders and outsiders working has been shocking. You will never get creative films unless you let in outisders from different backgrounds work in big films that has a bigger reach sharing their life experience that goes beyond London,Paris and South Bombay.

And this is the very reason why I find the KJo-Alia debate so redundant, there is so much more that is to be spoken about Bollywood as a whole, most importantly the roots of film-making which never seem to get enough attention. As an audience I feel there is something really lacking in Bollywood offlate and no it is not just about the actors. It has something to do with that one breakthrough film that blows your mind for one reason or the other. There are decent films in small parts but as a whole there is a punch that is missing. There is a great need for a better vision and better stories. In the music department, we are going backwards, so many films suffering with editing issues. The last time I heard about an editor was Namrata Rao. Sometimes I miss that vision of somebody like Ronnie who changed so much when it comes to offbeat movies becoming mainstream, reaching a larger audience. Phantom also going haywire. I'm not justifying one kind of nepotism at the cost of other or whatever but it is just that I stopped taking these debates in the forum seriously which seem more of fanwars than anything else. I'm not generalizing but stating a mere observation. I have been a Bollywood buff for a long time but given a majority of lackluster movies, the interest is wearing off. These days most of the hype has to do with personal lives and lifestyles of the celebs and less about the movie in its purest form.

Edited by guftagoo - 7 years ago

Quote

Mallika-E-Bhais

@Mallika-E-Bhais

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 7 years ago

#204

Originally posted by: BlackPanther7

How many films did Mr. Roshan make after KNPH? He made Koi Mil Gaya n Krrish. Rakesh Roshan NEVER denied that he had approached Ash for Krrish.

Look at his interview here:

Priyanka Chopra was your second choice for the heroine. You wanted Ash.

That's right. When I approached Aishwarya Rai, she showed keen inclination. But later, I learnt she was committed to some international projects. I approached Priyanka and she had the dates I wanted. She also suited the role. These things do happen. There is nothing to brood about.

http://www.rediff.com/movies/2006/feb/27rakesh.htm

MEB, YET Another Lie of yours getting exposed n decimated in the sweetest and classiest manner by ME!😎🤣⭐️

She very clearly said this in an IV Of her's that he approached for KNPH & most of his other films. You can believe what you like to.

Quote

angrybread

@angrybread

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#205

Related to NAPOTISM !!! ...forum ka fav discussion 😆

Quote

Deadinside

@Deadinside

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 7 years ago

#206

Originally posted by: -RD-
Flop and frustrated all the way! as if she is not getting movies on platter bec of her bachan tag despite her unwelcomed come back! Alia atleast has proved herself!

this is the only reason why she had to take dig. Aishwarya ka toh mandir ban rakha hai. page pe page chadhaye jaa rahe hai devi ji ko khush karne ke liye,, Lol.

Quote

745671

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#207

Ash's first choice bhajans never end. They're not even true half the time. Her arrogance and attitude are one of the main things that held her back.

The indian media is putting out articles today of KAJOL being first choice for the role Ash played in Josh. The director Mansoor Khan himself reveals it. Salman was never involved at all. SRK was first choice for the Max role, Aamijr for the Chandrachur Singh role and Kajol for Max's sister.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not Aishwarya Rai Bachchan! Kajol was the first choice to play Shah Rukh Khan's sister in 'Josh'

Recently, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan talked about the fact that Salman Khanwas originally going to play the lead in Josh. While it is interesting to think of someone else playing the tough and charming Max Dias instead of Shah Rukh Khan, it's about to get a lot more interesting. Shah Rukh's role was so popular, no one wanted to play anything but it.

During the Jio MAMI film festival, Mansoor Khan, the film's director, had revealed that everyone from Aamir Khan to Kajol was in contention for a role in the film. He had originally approached his cousin Aamir to play Aishwarya's suitor opposite Shah Rukh, but he wasn't having it. According to PTI, "He (Aamir) refused to play the role. I saw that as perfect casting. Aamir wanted to change the image and he no longer wanted to play the lover boy or romantic hero. The character of Max was charismatic so, everyone wanted to play Max. So Aamir would have never let Shah Rukh play it.

At one point, he even approached Kajol to play the role of Shah Rukh's sister, Aishwarya's role. However, she also had her sights set on another part. "When I met Kajol to play Shah Rukh's sister she walked away. I asked her if she is doing the film she said I want to play Max. So it was such an enigmatic character, he said. Apparently, the role was so good that every A-lister wanted it.

If you wanted something to think about, think of how Aamir would do as Max. Or how Kajol would be as the lead. There's something to trigger your imagination!

http://www.dnaindia.com/bollywood/report-not-aishwarya-rai-bachchan-kajol-was-the-first-choice-to-play-shah-rukh-khan-s-sister-in-josh-2647336

Edited by anonymous39 - 7 years ago

Quote

nigahen

@nigahen

Voyager

Posted: 7 years ago

#208

Originally posted by: ilovecrepes

Best f**kING answer! 👏.
Aish is selfmade.
Also she has worked in more languages than just Hindi and English . So it's beyond hw and bw.

I wonder if aloo even ever had to go for an audition or lobby for a role or go to meet someone for a script session .
Kjo seems to be literally pouring all scripts in her lap.

this 👏

Quote

745671

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#209

Originally posted by: angrybread
Related to NAPOTISM !!! ...forum ka fav discussion 😆

More like star kid stans screaming NEPOTISM!!!1111 for other star kids. 😆

Edited by anonymous39 - 7 years ago

Quote

angrybread

@angrybread

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#210

I Can not tolerate Alia but whatever Ash said in Alia's context fits word by word for her husband too ...only diff is her last 2-3 lines fit opposite in hubby's case where he couldn't do good work with those great opportunities which were in his lap regularly.