HAHA...now whose PR is this? - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

71

Views

7.1k

Users

24

Likes

113

Frequent Posters

448368 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: justwatching86

GOd knows why some (very few) Hrithik fans are so salty about sanju and Rk in general, when Hrithik himself has praised sanju, not once but three times already. He even replied to the haters trying to give credit to only hirani.

Sometimes I suspect that a certain HR fan on IF is a hr hater in disguise, who is using reverse psychology to actually put people off Hrithik


Exactly, I am hrithik fan too, but this member pisses me off ...
448368 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#52
Looks like Khilji's backside is on fire 🤣
Edited by Piyatrix - 7 years ago
cougarTown thumbnail
Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail 10th Anniversary Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 7 years ago
#53
why should ranbir not get credit for sanju's numbers
chalo maan lo..opening came coz of hirani and dutt..

but the fab wom adding many more numbers..don't you think his acting contributed to that fab wom which is translating to fab numbers..i mean if his acting was bad..wom will be bad too and we all know how bad wom movies crash..recent example is infront of us..
1042617 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#54
who beside RK has a shitty PR in Bollywood 😕 always posting negative articles about another & badmouthing another . no wonder people get annoyed 🤢
Japrilforever thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#55

Originally posted by: cougarTown

why should ranbir not get credit for sanju's numbers

chalo maan lo..opening came coz of hirani and dutt..

but the fab wom adding many more numbers..don't you think his acting contributed to that fab wom which is translating to fab numbers..i mean if his acting was bad..wom will be bad too and we all know how bad wom movies crash..recent example is infront of us..


Exactly! But some ppl want to conveniently ignore it coz it's too tough for them to accept RK's phenomenal work in Sanju.
1144445 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: cougarTown

why should ranbir not get credit for sanju's numbers

chalo maan lo..opening came coz of hirani and dutt..

but the fab wom adding many more numbers..don't you think his acting contributed to that fab wom which is translating to fab numbers..i mean if his acting was bad..wom will be bad too and we all know how bad wom movies crash..recent example is infront of us..



THANK YOU!!!

Oh but according to some experts here, only the magnificent Baba Singh deserves sole credit for the success of Padmaavat just because he had the author-backed role and whatnot

I mean get this...RS is a complete FLOP without piggybacking on Bhansali but still his stans insist he is the reason why RL, BM and Padmaavat are hits...even though all his non-Bhansali movies either flops or underperforms! I mean thanks to him, Aditya Chopra tasted his first flop as a director. OUCH!!!
yet the biggest irony is that same bunch will gleefully attribute Sanju's success to Hirani alone, even though RK has given hits with different directors and banners unlike the worthless RS who is forever dependent on Bhansali and controversies to survive!






Edited by God_Complex - 7 years ago
1144445 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: GrrrG

who beside RK has a shitty PR in Bollywood 😕 always posting negative articles about another & badmouthing another . no wonder people get annoyed 🤢



Your goddess DP who is infamous for attacking her contemporaries/rivals/juniors(does not even spare her seniors) by spreading malicious rumors against them through her overenthusiastic PR team?

not only that but her PR also publishes fake news(like the so-called female superhero project which went nowhere) in order to keep your unemployed goddess in the limelight!
Edited by God_Complex - 7 years ago
angrybread thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 7 years ago
#58
As per forum rules - It's always rival's pr when another actor/actress is put down and it's the pr of the actor/ actress who is being shown as great in the article , doesn't matter it is an old article or recycled article ... ab work out karo kiski prb 😉 😆
1144445 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#59

Originally posted by: angrybread

As per forum rules - It's always rival's pr when another actor/actress is put down and it's the pr of the actor/ actress who is being shown as great in the article , doesn't matter it is an old article or recycled article ... ab work out karo kiski prb 😉 😆



This is how the DeepVeer shippers always grasp at straws to defend their idols...even if/when they are in the wrong!
Edited by God_Complex - 7 years ago
1042617 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#60

Originally posted by: God_Complex



Your goddess DP who is infamous for attacking her contemporaries/rivals/juniors(does not even spare her seniors) by spreading malicious rumors against them through her overenthusiastic PR team?

not only that but her PR also publishes fake news(like the so-called female superhero project which went nowhere) in order to keep your unemployed goddess in the limelight!


yet only RK gets call out for spreading news n is called gossip queen by the industry people 🤢

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".