Originally posted by: cougarTown
why should ranbir not get credit for sanju's numbers
chalo maan lo..opening came coz of hirani and dutt..
but the fab wom adding many more numbers..don't you think his acting contributed to that fab wom which is translating to fab numbers..i mean if his acting was bad..wom will be bad too and we all know how bad wom movies crash..recent example is infront of us..
THANK YOU!!!
Oh but according to some experts here, only the magnificent Baba Singh deserves sole credit for the success of Padmaavat just because he had the author-backed role and whatnot
I mean get this...RS is a complete FLOP without piggybacking on Bhansali but still his stans insist he is the reason why RL, BM and Padmaavat are hits...even though all his non-Bhansali movies either flops or underperforms! I mean thanks to him, Aditya Chopra tasted his first flop as a director. OUCH!!!
yet the biggest irony is that same bunch will gleefully attribute Sanju's success to Hirani alone, even though RK has given hits with different directors and banners unlike the worthless RS who is forever dependent on Bhansali and controversies to survive!
Edited by God_Complex - 7 years ago