Khilji protected india from mongols

light_year thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#1
Khilji is shown as ayyash king. His trickery with rattan Singh surely shows his lack of ethics. But its due to khilji mongols couldn' enter india. On the contrary khiljis barbarian dance reminds me of mongols and If they had managed to enter north indian . North indian people would hav looked magolian chinese instead of pearsian , He surely had his own motives to protect his empire. But history of mongols shows they distroyed everything in there way. People livestock anything which can move. So much so that when they reached Bagdad Iraq, islamic capital at that time some islamic historians , scholars claimed them to be punishment from God. There soilders killed killed and they killed. Changaiz khan belived in keeping his army happy. He devided the spoils of war , such as wealth riches women quite generously among his soilders. Thats why his soilders gave what ever they hav for him. Khilji could stop him , when big big empires at those time couldnt. An ayyash king cant do that, a king needsto hav form to perform in battle. Ayyashi even to this day steals from concentration. Such kings cant rule empires . Enjyoing a womens company is one thing and getting all immersed in it is diffrent. Even rathan singh hitorically had 14 wives before padmavati. Very common phenomena among royals at that time.
Discuss...

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

572

Users

7

Likes

27

Frequent Posters

1011128 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#2

Originally posted by: light_year

Khilji is shown as ayyash king. His trickery with rattan Singh surely shows his lack of ethics. But its due to khilji mongols couldn' enter india. On the contrary khiljis barbarian dance reminds me of mongols and If they had managed to enter north indian . North indian people would hav looked magolian chinese instead of pearsian , He surely had his own motives to protect his empire. But history of mongols shows they distroyed everything in there way. People livestock anything which can move. So much so that when they reached Bagdad Iraq, islamic capital at that time some islamic historians , scholars claimed them to be punishment from God. There soilders killed killed and they killed. Changaiz khan belived in keeping his army happy. He devided the spoils of war , such as wealth riches women quite generously among his soilders. Thats why his soilders gave what ever they hav for him. Khilji could stop him , when big big empires at those time couldnt. An ayyash king cant do that, a king needsto hav form to perform in battle. Ayyashi even to this day steals from concentration. Such kings cant rule empires . Enjyoing a womens company is one thing and getting all immersed in it is diffrent. Even rathan singh hitorically had 14 wives before padmavati. Very common phenomena among royals at that time.

Discuss...


Rataan had 14 wives lol...bad acha badnaam bura

Basically i have seen that royalty itself is wrong...who has given the right for some to rule like king..whether they are khilji or ratan...or chengaiz...

And some qualities are common...they kill a lot of people...they treat people as trash...women were there for pleasure...

they had good qualities as well...

as long as history is followed and no personal agenda is injected to polarize an issue where going out of the way to one as so nice and other is totally bad - hipppo does not have any problem

yes ur point is right...it was good that khilji defended this region from mongols..they were worst of the worst

but then again it was all about territory . not love
Edited by hippopotamus - 7 years ago
JustMySelf thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#3
oh i see..
then the Britishers protected India from Portuguese ..
History says Portuguese ruled n colonized India until the
marriage treaty was entered into between daughter of john 4
of Portugal named catherine n charles 2 of england.basically it means India
was gifted as dowry to king of england..n if khilji saved us from
mongols then east india company actually saved us from the
portuguese ..surely India needed such saviours indeed - frying pan to fire.
TheBoss thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#4
So he was like Norton anti virus who supposedly protected your computer but actually infected it more. 😆
sherlockthor thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 7 years ago
#5
Kya bakwaas logic is this.
One invader protecting from another Invader?!?!

To glorify Khilji , people are going to any lengths.


Ur-Miserable thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#6
He protected his empire not India.
Itna simple cheez nahi samajh nahi atah hai logo ko.

And what is wrong in looking mongoliod instead of Persian?
beingsirius thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#7
I don't understand this love for Khilji. His soldiers even raped bodies of dead Hindu women what to talk of living women. Babur's hobby was to create pillars of human heads...

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

3 days ago

Should Janhvi Kapoor Join India Forums

Should Janhvi Kapoor Join India Forums and keep A Track Of Topics Posted On Her

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

25 days ago

Rashmika Mandanna & Vijay Devarakonda India Day New York parade

Rashmika Mandanna Vijay Devarakonda India Day New York parade https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNdw7eAJPrT/?igsh=MTl3YmJyYnd0OWk5aQ==

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

1 months ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".