New York Times TRASHES Padmaavat

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

hasini009

@hasini009

Achiever

+ 12

Posted: 7 years ago

#111

some of

Hindu groups

Rajput Senas

Feminists, Leftists & Rightists ki protests made people curious to know what's wrong/right with Padmavat(i).

ab muslim groups ki bari hai protest karne ka. will they take note from NYT's article and start promoting...oops protesting PADMAVAT.

every publicity is good publicity you know😎

kehte hain agar kisi cheez ko agar dil se chaho to saari kayanath tumhe usse milane ki koshish me lag jaati hai

Quote

Resident_Evil

@Resident_Evil

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#112

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

Hilarious review...and is the 3D version that bad?😳

I saw it in IMAX 3D and i had a splitting headache at the end. Honest. 😭

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Hello_kitta

@Hello_kitta

Rocker

Posted: 7 years ago

#113

Somebody tell them this film is not produce by Donald trump. For them ,What was jodh akabar ? love jihad. Lol

Quote

Ume Salma Kakal

@sunflower52

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#114

I can understand why some might felt that it was anti Muslim, due to the way Khilji was shown, uncouth, having no honor etc. This onus lies on SLB, guess it shows how people can buy bullshit shown in movies by making this movie hit or have little to or no knowledge about historical people.

Anyways the review is 😆.

Quote

bips

@bips

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 7 years ago

#115

Yaarrr... Religion kahan se aa gaya??.. Ab khilji ka religion hi change kar dete kya? .. Invaders did not win by being benevolent..

On the contrary rajputs should be protesting more ki unko itna ullu dikhaya... All the rajputs kings were shown mouthing big dialogues but being total idiots

Religious angle wala toh kuch bhi nahin tha movie mein

Quote

djoker

@djoker

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#116

when washinton post wrote an article critizing the country and glorfying the movie he same people praised it and endorsed it😆😆(saying how crdible that paper is lmao)now when nyt writes criticizing it the same people do a u turn😆😆

Quote

1105912

Suspended

Posted: 7 years ago

#117

Originally posted by: djoker
when washinton post wrote an article critizing the country and glorfying the movie he same people praised it and endorsed it😆😆(saying how crdible that paper is lmao)now when nyt writes criticizing it the same people do a u turn😆😆

THIS! THIS! THIS!

👏👏👏

Quote

Japrilforever

@Japrilforever

Dazzler

Posted: 7 years ago

#118

Originally posted by: divaz

this is what sanjay leela fails at putting across a balanced perspective, his movies are very unrealistic

Never liked his movies.

Even in padmaavat, except for the jauhar scene nothing is great as such. Overhyped for no reason.

Quote

keshav

@VS-Cool

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#119

Originally posted by: -JaprilForever-
However ruthless khilji may have been, so many scenes in the movie are unrealistic and stupid. According to Wikipedia, he hadi introduced many administrative reforms which did benefit the ppl of Delhi.
He wasn't just a crazy and ruthless woman hunter the way SLB has portrayed him. The movie was definitely biased towards the Rajputs. Maybe not islamophobic, but SLB has exaggerated the characterisations and tried to show only negatives of Khilji and only positives of Rajputs without a balance.

i agree on the point about khilji's "some" positive works

but the film is about Queen Padmavati... so his characterization is to the point only ...

there is NO need to show his positive tactics at all ... make Allauddin khilji movie for that

Quote

keshav

@VS-Cool

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#120

Originally posted by: bips
Yaarrr... Religion kahan se aa gaya??.. Ab khilji ka religion hi change kar dete kya? .. Invaders did not win by being benevolent..

On the contrary rajputs should be protesting more ki unko itna ullu dikhaya... All the rajputs kings were shown mouthing big dialogues but being total idiots

Religious angle wala toh kuch bhi nahin tha movie mein

what is idiocity in that?

they were not losers like others who fought cowardly ...

they always followed their war ethics and rules for their own pride ...

like a dialougue in the film :

itihaas apne panne badal sakta hai magar rajput apne usool nahi badla karte ...

lad jayenge mar jayenge magar dharm viruddh karya ya peeth dikhakar nahi bhagenge