Beyond Padmavati: Another case of Regression by I&B Ministry - Page 7

Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun

Completely agree with the starting line of the article. Now it has become more like a morality certificate. No wonder BW movies and censor board is hugely mocked outside India. 😔

Originally posted by: anjs

yea, and sometimes its not even sickulars. I remember this incidence narsated by one of my friend, she was having some personal problems. so another colleague took her to a church sermon so that she might feel better and find a way out, but that sermon was so full of hatred for hindu's and hindu deities, calling the deities as devils and hindus as worshipers of devils, reason being cause hindu's dance on ganesh immersion day. Can you imagine, when the person preaching in a church, respected by them says all this, that what will the followers think ?

I am sorry If I hurt any christian's sentiments, but this was a real incidence told by my friend. After the sermon she felt more horrible instead of feeling at peace.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

ewww...a sex scene between a MIL and DIL...and there was absolutely no other way to show a liberated woman other than having sex with her own mother-in-law?? How the hell is that liberation...that is wrong in every single way possible...is that idiot film maker out of his mind or what??🤢

Originally posted by: frosty

They were not mother in law and daughter in law. They wer two co-sister in laws. Married to two brothers. Just because people want to make their point, make some crap up. This is how I was sure that people taking objection had not even seen it.

Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun

Completely agree with the starting line of the article. Now it has become more like a morality certificate. No wonder BW movies and censor board is hugely mocked outside India. 😔

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

How does that change anything...it is still as wrong...I am not against them showing sex between two women...I am just against the idea of showing anything in the name of women liberation...the two co-sisters having sex with each other falls the category of CHEATING ON THEIR SPOUSES...not women's liberation...it is as simple as that..

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

How does that change anything...it is still as wrong...I am not against them showing sex between two women...I am just against the idea of showing anything in the name of women liberation...the two co-sisters having sex with each other falls the category of CHEATING ON THEIR SPOUSES...not women's liberation...it is as simple as that..

Originally posted by: ZanduBaaM

<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">BL ji
</font>

<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">SEX = women empowerment hai aaj kal ka logic</font>

<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">pata nahikahan sekhareedi aisi bokwas dictionery in logo ne</font>

Originally posted by: frosty

They were not cheating for the heck of it. Because they wanted the thrill of experimentation. The sex was shown as a natural progression of their feelings for each other. Plus they were trapped in marriages where they were just toys for their husband. For example shabana's husband expected her to simulate foreplay so that he could resist it. To prove how religious he is, not giving a damn about her feelings. You really need to watch it before passing judgement