Posted:
I have never said that.Originally posted by: pakeezah
Your all posts are.nothing but hypothesis on why Hrithik is a pure soul who is getting hauled over the coals by a wicked witch for doing absolutely NOTHING and no wrongdoing.Kangana meanwhile is everything that is wrong, low, to be looked down in a woman. And Hrithik has to be be put.on a pedestal and his picture worshipped because he is so pure.
I have said it does not matter whether he is a saint or a womanizing adulterer. The only issue is whether he had an affair with Kangana. She has made many many accusations against him from criminal (intimidation, stalking, transmitting po*nography) to trivial (dumb) but has produced absolutely no proof of even a simple consensual affair. Any reasonable person would expect there to be some evidence of a real affair. Yet she is allowed to repeatedly make all these claims, which you yourself have said will never leave him, without anyone seriously questioning her or seeing any proof.
What I have said is if a man were doing this to a woman, there were be an uproar. Most especially if the biggest "defense" his supporters used to defend his aggression was, "that girl is no saint. Do you know how much she sleeps around?"
If a man accused of stalking and harassing a woman and was trying to publicly humiliate her and claim they had a consensual affair she denies used as his only "proof", "she's slept with lots of men, why would she refrain from having sex with a hero who is infatuated with her and she took for her home production not once but TWICE." Would you accept that?
s**t shaming is s**t shaming whether the alleged s**t is male or female.
Health and Fitness
Anupamaa
6