Hrithik asked Aaj Tak to remove Kangana question AFTER interview.

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#81

One minute Miss Ranaut et al insist he is dumb as dirt...the next they insist Hrithik was so smart he erased any and all traces of a 7 year love affair with a smart strong woman. Not a single witness, hotel receipt, SMS, email, or photograph.

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#82

^And why would Hrithik need to do it all by himself. There are lot of hackers out there who can do the job for him, provided he pays them well. (Not saying he did it, but just opening up a possibility).

Unforunately for him, he cannot hire hackers or smarter people to give interviews for him. He has to do that himself. 😆

BTW I was thinking about it, while there is no proof that Kangana has lied, Hrithik has lied openly by stating that he does not know Kangana socially; despite attending her parties and inviting her to his parties.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#83

Originally posted by: ponymo
^And why would Hrithik need to do it all by himself. There are lot of hackers out there who can do the job for him, provided he pays them well. (Not saying he did it, but just opening up a possibility).

Unforunately for him, he cannot hire hackers or smarter people to give interviews for him. He has to do that himself. 😆

BTW I was thinking about it, while there is no proof that Kangana has lied, Hrithik has lied openly by stating that he does not know Kangana socially; despite attending her parties and inviting her to his parties.

And all those people who helped him erase a 7 year affair would be witnesses. Where are they?

Lets at least be consistent. You have objected multiple times to anyone using Kangana's camp as proxies for Kangana. Hrithik never said he didn't know her. He said he didn't have an affair with her. His lawyer may not have spoken plainly in the private legal notice but the intent was clear. There was no intimate relationship. I can show you photographs and video of Hrithik at the birthday parties of one year olds. And?

Quote

Illyrion

@Illyrion

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#84

PS Even KRK has republished direct quotes of Kangana claiming a 2 year affair in the midst of her claimed 7year affair with Hrithik. Stands to reason either she is/was lying or the "relationship" was other than she pretends. This is only one lie of many documented KangNa Ranaut lies.

Quote

LiveEatLove

@LiveEatLove

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#85

Originally posted by: Nova19

And all those people who helped him erase a 7 year affair would be witnesses. Where are they?

Lets at least be consistent. You have objected multiple times to anyone using Kangana's camp as proxies for Kangana. Hrithik never said he didn't know her. He said he didn't have an affair with her. His lawyer may not have spoken plainly in the private legal notice but the intent was clear. There was no intimate relationship. I can show you photographs and video of Hrithik at the birthday parties of one year olds. And?

If she was seeing HR for 7 years then when was she seeing Nicholas or has she already claimed to cheat on Nicholas for HR ? 😆

Quote

--Pro.vo.King--

@--Pro.vo.King--

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#86

Originally posted by: pakeezah

What the heck are you ON about?

what U-turn? Hrithik debuted in 2000. ...t's 2017now. I loved the newcomer hrithik, so humble, kind, well behaved when he debuted with his.lovely fiancee by his side. The whole world wad in love with that hrithik. Remember?
But a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then.! Kareena, narcissism, Barbara, Susanne walking out, both of them looking like zombies, kangana rumours, Suzanne separating,. Till recently I couldn't care less. Just another movie star given into temptation. A fallen idol. Happens.

But when kangana revealed he outed her of a movie after they broke up, and all his.lies, not knowing her socially, he threatening her with a suit for just a comment. ...I can't stand hrithik. I mean most movie stars hv affairs left right n centre, they get heroines replaced, but they don't pretend to be Mother Teresa to the public whose modesty has been questioned. Fufff!

And don't worry about kangana thinking affair is in her head...if hrithik had been capable of keeping his pants on outside his marriage the public would not hv heard of kareena Barbara kangana Shweta bachchan. Don't be scared for kangana, be scared for your idol. Not only is he a womanizer of the highest order but he is also delusional in convincing himself that he is 'pure' as snow. How dare a woman expose him!

Let me spell it out for you - firstly you said Hrithik's interviews makes his guilt clear & that "people are smart" but when I contradicted saying Hrithik was never an eleqount speaker & that he was often mocked by people for his boring interviews , you changed your tone from "people's opinion" to "your opinion" .. And there within lies the "U" turn ..

That's a nice summary of the fallen star .. Now only if you can sum up Kangana .. 😆

Is Hrithik trying to convince himself that he is pure as snow ? .. Did Kangana tell you that ? .. Or else how would you know what he is trying to convince himself ? ..

I wasn't scared FOR Kangana , my concern was for her past/present and would be victims .. If it did happen in her head , she is a danger to herself as well as others around her ..but like I said before , m willing to give her the benefit of doubt here .. Keeping my fingers crossed , hoping she doesn't turn out to be a complete nutjob ..

And my idol ? ..😆 .. As long as he can get by without going cuckoo crazy , I am sure he ll be fine which is more than what I can say for the other party ..

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#87

Originally posted by: Nova19

And all those people who helped him erase a 7 year affair would be witnesses. Where are they?

Lets at least be consistent. You have objected multiple times to anyone using Kangana's camp as proxies for Kangana. Hrithik never said he didn't know her. He said he didn't have an affair with her. His lawyer may not have spoken plainly in the private legal notice but the intent was clear. There was no intimate relationship. I can show you photographs and video of Hrithik at the birthday parties of one year olds. And?

And why would Hrithik reveal these witnesses? Money talks. I am not saying this happened, but it is possible.

As far as I can remember, Hrithik's notice said he only knew her in professional capacity. So I was talking about that. The intent? Lawyers are very serious about wording and phrasing especially when writing notices. I don't think he would let such a major slip-up happen in the notice. He also said she sent 50 emails per day, which over the course of two years is more than 3000. But the actual number is 1400-odd. Lot of lacunae in his notice.

Quote

ponymo

@ponymo

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#88

Originally posted by: Nova19
PS Even KRK has republished direct quotes of Kangana claiming a 2 year affair in the midst of her claimed 7year affair with Hrithik. Stands to reason either she is/was lying or the "relationship" was other than she pretends. This is only one lie of many documented KangNa Ranaut lies.

When did she say she had a 7 year long relationship? She said she had an affair during Kites, but didn't mention any 7 year long relationship. Had she been in a 7 year long relationship with him, why would she reject Krrish 3?

Edited by ponymo - 8 years ago

Quote

humanity

@F.I.T.B

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

#89

Originally posted by: ponymo
^And why would Hrithik need to do it all by himself. There are lot of hackers out there who can do the job for him, provided he pays them well. (Not saying he did it, but just opening up a possibility).

Unforunately for him, he cannot hire hackers or smarter people to give interviews for him. He has to do that himself. 😆

BTW I was thinking about it, while there is no proof that Kangana has lied, Hrithik has lied openly by stating that he does not know Kangana socially; despite attending her parties and inviting her to his parties.

and you forget one thing by Kangu's own words about duggu

" toh phir kyun woh lot lot ke dance kar raha thaa in my birthday..." 🤣🤣

Quote

1093604

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

#90

Originally posted by: ponymo
^And why would Hrithik need to do it all by himself. There are lot of hackers out there who can do the job for him, provided he pays them well. (Not saying he did it, but just opening up a possibility).

Possible, but implausible, if Hrithik hires a hacker, he creates a liability for himself, now a third party has access to all his hidden secrets, it just creates more unnecessary complications for him, even he pays them off well, there's no guarantee that this hacker(s) won't blackmail him in the future, too risky.

Now what? are you now going to say that he's willing to pay them for their rest of his life to hide one affair? 😆