🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 India vs Pakistan, 6th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, 14th Sept '25 Episode Discussion Thread
KIARA THROWN 14.9
When a lie is repeated hundred times…
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 15, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
TRAUMA DRAMA 15.9
Cocktail 2 begins shooting with Shahid ,Kriti and Rashmika!
What happened to Tiger Shroff? Why did he decline?
Which movie is your 1st choice on 2nd October?
Malla and ARS running crime list
Did Karishma deserve the best actress award for Raja Hindustani?
Anupamaa 15 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Kaun banege PL ke Mummy and Papa?
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: UAE vs Oman, 7th Match, Group A, Abu Dhabi🏏
Conceiving of PL…
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread- 15th Sept 2025.
Sidvi FF: Chocolate (continued)
BALH Naya Season EDT Week #14: Sept 15 to 19
Katrina Kaif Is Pregnant
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: SL vs HK, 8th Match, Group B at Dubai🏏
Originally posted by: SahiPakdeHain
Curfew in Noida and I'm in my office !
So much stress for one rapist followers .. kaun hai ye log they deserve to be in jail right now bloody loosers
Originally posted by: ChannaMereya
Well in that case ge wasnt alone his orev cji also have been insisting on reforms and he had very backward views tat was problem
protection is even given to many other laws and judiciary intervenes when necessary he even said 1200 old practise so it should not be held invalid.IMo he was worser than other judge who had such backward views and he dis put personal views ovee constituion.And he was not only one who pushed for reforms or case others did there was slow change and he gets creditOriginally posted by: ~*sindhu*~
Of course but since he was the one who was able to bring the reform I will credit him. If he did have backward views he would have never pushed for this case to heard during the summer vacation. He could have avoided it. The problem in my opinion is muslim laws are protected by constituition. Only Parliament can change that and he rightly stated that they should change the laws so that many more such cases can be dealt with firmly.
Wat nonsense cases related to temple wntry are still dragged and enough time given to all cases stop that false propaganda feeding everywhere and kashmiri pandit is different issue still it is looking into that .Originally posted by: crazygul
my question for SC is why it easily delivers judgements on hinduism but on Islam says it is out of preview of the Constitution. why it told kashmiri pandits that its too late for giving them judgement ??
the triple talaq hearing should have been ended on day 1 thats its unconstitutional. but SC read the sharia than it delivered the judgement by 3-2. why the two judges voted for triple talaq.
Originally posted by: ChannaMereya
Wat nonsense cases related to temple wntry are still dragged and enough time given to all cases stop that false propaganda feeding everywhere and kashmiri pandit is different issue still it is looking into that .
Originally posted by: ChannaMereya
protection is even given to many other laws and judiciary intervenes when necessary he even said 1200 old practise so it should not be held invalid.IMo he was worser than other judge who had such backward views and he dis put personal views ovee constituion.And he was not only one who pushed for reforms or case others did there was slow change and he gets credit
https://x.com/DonPalathara/status/1951312414252650702
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/baba-ramdev-says-hardware-fine-software-faulty-after-shefali-jariwalas-tragic-death_224277
https://x.com/Its_Vivek786/status/1885984399558348916
https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/television-news/article/paparazzo-calls-bharti-singh-ubli-hui-madhuri-dixit-angry-fans-react-23520979
https://x.com/bollyhungama/status/1902533046903198128?s=46...
43