Posted:
Originally posted by: .Omkara.
@BOLD: Yup, this i was referring, which u clarified.Ek Tha Tiger - Non-South remake filmSultan - Non-South remake filmContent WOM of Bajrangi Bhaijaan was highest, when it released, it wasn't given SCREENS in SOUTH, reason BAHUBALI 1 was running. While, BAHUBALI 1 (Hindi) was given Equal Space in 2nd Week which every big film gets, which helped it score 100+ Cr in that version. THIS Is the basic Difference.If south ppl love content so much, what was wrong with Bajrangi, which was having better WOM than PK, why was it neglected in SOUTH, what happened???Even if there is no Big SOUTH film over there, still many CONTENT film suffers in that area, which i can show you CIRCUIT wise collections of those ART CENTRIC CRITICS fav. films, which is everybody's fav. films over here on IF.South ppl ignore, their wish, no need to defend by bringing few Salman's south remakes, you guys can't even make out a diff between south remake & hindi original...as if south never remakes.
South people don't watch Bollywood movies much because they don't know Hindi. Was Bajrangi Bhaijaan dubbed and released in the South and are you counting dubbed collections? Many times even if they're dubbed, the dubbing is very bad. And usually there are their own language films playing simultaneously in the theaters so people will naturally opt for those. Baahubali was an exception because they took care to get proper Hindi dialogue writers and dubbing artists and spent money doing a quality dubbing. If it wasn't done well, you think north people would've owned it like they did?
Bigg Boss 19
22