Why Wasn't Baahubali A Trilogy?

Page

Next Last

Altaf Hussain

@Taify

Inactive

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

Just why?

they could've shown the final battle in the third part.

why not? 🥱

Quote

Frequent Posters

DayanHunter

@DayanHunter

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

May b because of Indian superstitious belief teen tigadha kam bidarha😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Sultan

@I_M_SultaN

Master

+ 11

Posted: 8 years ago

true

the last battle was too rushed

Quote

bokul

@bokul

Master

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Agree..that would have been better

Quote

576281

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

We never know...The last line spoken in the movie was when the titles were rolling and it is a kid being curious if Mahendra's son would be the next king...I feel they kept the doors open for part-3!

Edited by cricketfan1 - 8 years ago

Quote

Justmoi

@Justmoi

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

According to SSR sir, If his father would come up with a story, he would make Bahubali 3. Until then there will be different stories of the Bahubali universe told and not necessarily on film. 'The Rise of Shivagami' is a book about Shivagami and already available. I think they are planning a cartoon or a web series. Not sure.

Quote

bokul

@bokul

Master

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Any one knows there is a Baahubali game already ?
available in google play I think

Quote

bokul

@bokul

Master

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: cricketfan1
We never know...The last line spoken in the movie was when the titles were rolling and it is a kid being curious if Mahendra's son would be the next king...I feel they kept the doors open for part-3!

I missed that part then

Quote

Mimi_

@Mimi_

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: Taify
Just why?
they could've shown the final battle in the third part.

why not? 🥱

Rajamouli took 4 years to make these 2 parts. No way Prabhas would've given more time to him. After the first part Prabhas said in an interview that when Rajamouli first came to him he asked for 1 year of his dates to make both parts. Prabhas worked with Rajamouli before, so he knew no way he would finish in 1 year, so he gave him 2 years time. But the 2 years turned into 4 years. I think he wants to move on and do other roles now.

Quote

Janaki

@RamKiSeeta

Achiever

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#10

No, I think it's perfect as it is. The final battle was a bit fast, but it was still really good. A third movie just on the battle would be way too dragged and unnecessary. Moreover, the second movie became such a hit because the first ended in suspense. There is not enough story left to create as much suspense in the second one. Making a third movie would be a huge risk and I feel like it might have flopped, as the first two movies had strong storylines and enough suspense to keep the audience hooked for three hours each time.

Quote

1 2

Why Wasn't Baahubali A Trilogy?

Related Topics

Explore Topics