Why is the industry against Hrithik Roshan?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Seig heil

@S_H_Y

Achiever

+ 9

Z-Gen Zest

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: ZanduBaaM

kamine secret kyu khol raha hai 😆

Isme SRK ka haath hai article se yahi laga

Quote

dinki24

@dinki24

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

What bullshit.. if he had really circulated kangu's pics to the media and industry people, wouldn't the pics be out for everyone to see? kangu has successfully managed to convince everyone that she is a bechari victim without a single proof..

HR is going thru a low phase and ppl from the industry are enjoying his bad time.. let them laugh as much as they want.. they will all come back shamelessly as soon as he delivers another hit..

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

mamta swaika

@-ajna-

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil
Poor HR 😒
When did he release pics of Kangana, btw? Didn't know about that.. and yeah, that legal battle between them was too much, but I cannot say because IDK the entire story.

This guy has been through a lot since past 2-3 years, I hope things start getting better for him..

Actually it was the other way around ...it was KR who released a picture to prove some imaginary liaison ...at least a private affair which she should have left private. She was the one to start the attack HR by referring to him as her silly ex. This industry is replete with liaisons so even if they did have something going KR should have maintained dignity. I am absolutely on Hrithik's side on this one. The actresses who supported KR did so only to win brownie points as feminists.

Quote

-Piku-

@-Piku-

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

How could Salman force him to dance with that flop actress Daisy 😲😲 DId not know about this controversy

Why didn't Salman dance himself with his heroine Daisy?

Quote

870349

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

If he has no friends he must first look in the mirror. We've all had to do that

Quote

Rohit

@Anachronist

Trailblazer

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: raj80
that was from KRK 😆...

u doubt KRK 😲

Quote

cpatel90

@cpatel90

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

I didn't read article...

But for the question

Why is the industry against Hrithik Roshan?

I doubt anyone from Bollywood is against him. He is still being offered the biggest of the film.

But yes, he needs to do at least two films a year.

Quote

Erika

@roni_berna

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 9 years ago

#18

I couldn't stop myself 🤣

Quote

simplyrdb

@simplyrdb

Navigator

Posted: 9 years ago

#19

Its hilarious reading all this negative articles and I think they will continue until the release date of Kaabil is moved. If it isn't fans have to go through this negativity until next Hrithik movie that opens with a bang!

As far as Mohenjo Daro is concerned it just all came together for it. The last time Hrithik made film with Ashutosh Gowarikar, he was coming off a sensational high of 2006 with double blockbusters. Jodhha Akbar had Aishwarya as heroine and Gowarikar too was at a peak. Still the film didn't create any wonders at box office. It had a decent opening and iirc Sarkaar Raj had similar opening to it. JA had good run, again only on weekends (it would drop on weekdays) and finally ended with a decent total. It's run was anything but spectacular.

MD didn't have any of the advantages of JA and on top of that it had a clash. The negativity resulted in lower than expected opening. But it was in any case not going to open with bang (certainly could have opened bigger than Rustom though). Had he come with something commercial there wouldn't have been a competition at all like he saw with Bang Bang and Haider. The genre, Kangana controversy, other issues and lack of promotions all have hurt MD here.

Quote

mamta swaika

@-ajna-

Sparkler

Posted: 9 years ago

#20

MD may not be a great movie but it is not so bad for the majority of critics to have trashed it. So it is possible that there is a campaign here to malign the film. What stands out for me is that it is the film that has been targeted and NOT HR. most reviews have canned the film but praised his effort. It is a different from BV where both the film and RK were criticized. So it stands to reason that here the target is Ashutosh Gowarikar and NOT Hrithik. Hrithik has always been a low key sort of guy and he continues to be so. The "my silly ex " from KR did rile him enough to take a stand though I do not think the industry as a whole has ganged up against him or anything like that over that unsavoury episode.I am not convinced he has been targeted.These affairs are passe in BW and would not decide the fate of a movie I am sure. Akshay is rumoured to have a bigger roving eye than HR definitely so if la'affaire was the reason it would be AK to be targeted.
Akshay may have had some reviews doctored ..these superstars are believed to take that course specially when they are at the fag end of their careers.They have the resources and are on shaky ground .

But the fall guy is AG for sure and not HR.

I recall a face off between SRK and AG at an award function (for which I am unable to find the link) , between AG & Sajid Khan at Screen - https://youtu.be/LYNED9a8QVA

Sajid is Farah's brrother and FK is a close buddy of SRK.

Next another huge public gaffe at IIFA in 2009

"Ashutosh Gowariker apparently managed to wedge two feet in his mouth at this year's International Indian Film Academy Awards in Macau, China.

Foot One was inserted when he ingloriously slammed actress Priyanka Chopra with this unfortunate accolade cum insult: "Priyanka I love you, but I don't know how you got the award for Best Actress when Aishwarya was also nominated in the same category for 'Jodhaa Akbar'."

While I was tempted to give him the benefit of the doubt for a sarcastic joke gone awry, he promptly inserted Foot Two during his attempt to recover from this gaffe, wondering aloud if Priyanka's hard work, rather than lack of natural talent, was reason for this award. Directly from the horse's (rather wide) mouth: "Maybe it is because you are very hard-working and she is a natural..."
I wonder: Too many feet for one mouth . . .or is his mouth too big for one foot? "

PC as we all know is an SRK favourite.

I am therefore convinced the industry has stood up against the director and not the star with SRK taking up the cudgels.