Hrithik snatches journalist's camera, refuses to return

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

664269

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: bips

I believe professional cameras cost a couple of cool lakhs and most photographers scrimp and save for years to get the one they love ... thats why they went to all the trouble to get it back

... HR could have simply deleted the photos in like 2 mins and returned the camera ... phaltu mein itna kheenchne ki kya zaroorat thi ?

the whole film cost much more than that camera, including two years of hard work , that is why HR's security went thru the trouble and tried to seize it.

yes HR could have deleted it and gave the camera but then how would be he sure that the reporter was not trying to take the pictures again or following the team to get some breaking news ?

Quote

TheRager

@TheRager

Achiever

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: B-TEX
He wanted to take credit of those risky stunt scenes.

Thats the first thing I thought when I read the news in the morning in this link. Body double's presence is clear.

http://www.mumbaimirror.com/entertainment/bollywood/When-Hrithik-lost-his-cool-over-a-pic/articleshow/51688739.cms

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

RamSiyaRam

@RamSiyaRam

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: Patronus

MM is actually a part of TOI 😆

Yes its Times group publication but not a big brand like TOI.

Baap BAAP hota hai aur Beta BETA😆

Quote

angrybread

@angrybread

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#44

Hritik pagla gaya hai aajkal 😆

Not siding with media but that's just being ridiculous when you keep the camera with you for 24 hours . We have already seen his look in pictures for MD and there have been articles too about recreating a romantic scene, fighting with crocodile , location pictures etc so what is he trying to hide now 😕 or is it body double he is trying to hide 😆

Quote

theprince

@theprince

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#45

great work from hrithik this shit need to stop 👍🏼

Quote

-spartacus-

@Spartacuss

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#46

Chori pakdi gaya toh itna Gussa ho raha hai isko😆

Quote

1061832

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: yamyam
This so looks like a case of exaggeration and sour grapes😆

Considering Degirl posted this.. me thinks she still aint over Kareena abortion from 2001

LMAO
Saifeena babies will never happen 😈

Quote

807116

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#48

If those photographs give any hint of a climax scene, I definitely don't want to view them. But how do we know, whether it was an important scene or unimportant scene?

As someone brought into to notice, if the scene is incorporating a body double, it might be a crucial scene. Hence could be such extreme reaction. They make with a budget of 100s of crores, do not want to loose on their revenues because of a photographer.

Quote

whereiam

@whereiam

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: B-TEX
He wanted to take credit of those risky stunt scenes.

Well, the body double is always there as a safety precaution, but Hrithik ends up doing the risky stunts himself.

Quote

998331

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#50

Originally posted by: whereiam

Well, the body double is always there as a safety precaution, but Hrithik ends up doing the risky stunts himself.

I know. Stars don't do the long shots of a stunt. As Salman said once, dur ka shot khud karke kya faida? But detractors and people who don't have any idea about film-making buy those All His Stunts Were Done by Body Double news. I think, that's the reason he wanted to hide it.

Edited by B-TEX - 9 years ago