Can Ranveer surpass Ranbir ?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

ptolemy

@ptolemy

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#11

I think he is the better actor, but no, (in my opinion). Ranveer is too polarizing & will never have a legion of preteen girl fans the way Ranbir had at his peak. Ranbir was never going to sustain that type of "stardom-potential" though, he still can't transition out of his coming-of-age vehicles.

Quote

Blackwater

@Blackwater

Voyager

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#12

I hope bm doesn't turn out to b ranveer's Bombay velvet

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Eboo

@Eboo

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#13

Hmm both are equally good but i prefer Ranveer 😆 and to think that Ranveer done only 8 movie including BM. Ranbir is predictable and kind of boring lately with his performances. I think I am one of the less people who didnt see anything extraordinary in his Tamasha performance its like all earlier performances of his are comprised in to one movie. While with Ranveer its exciting to see whats next. We know right know its Befikre with Adi and thats a big deal no matter if that man only had success with SRK or his movie were bad but it will still definetely interesting see. And else we know nothing while Ranbir has JJ with Anurag B. the plagiarist than Kjo i have the feeling that this will be Kjos BV, the Dutt biopic not a fan of that man so i have to wait for Ayans project.

Quote

whereiam

@whereiam

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

#14

Forget Ranveer, even KSG can surpass him.

Quote

Justmoi

@Justmoi

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#15

😕

If the 3 Khans can exist comfortably on top at the age of 50, why shouldn't Ranbir and Ranveer. They each have their niches and individual strengths, they are both dedicated, are not afraid to change their appearance or disappear into a character, they both seem to love the art of movies, not just as a paycheck. They are both an asset to BW and there are very few like them, so why should they not co-exist. In fact it would be a loss if one of them was not in BW IMO. Everything is not a competition.

Edited by Justmoi - 9 years ago

Quote

923402

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: whereiam
Forget Ranveer, even KSG can surpass him.

KSG is awesome, love his acting. 😳

Quote

KhanSinghKumar

@KhanSinghKumar

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 9 years ago

#17

yes, he can... he always wanted to be an actor so the dedication and urge is there at every point...also he is far more comfortable with masses than biru..

but i want them to stay complementary... ranveer is more versatile, ranbir is more natural

Quote

Joker19

@Joker19

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

#18

Ranveer is more versatile than Ranbir ..I think Ranveer can be all around actor who can do comedy, romance, action, thriller ect..He's doing period film in his 1st 5 years in BW which is impressive.