Better Dancer: Aish or Rani? - Page 4

Originally posted by: ibelieveinpink

I think anyone agrees Madhuri vs Sri Devi might be a better poll. No but someone mentioned how Rani is better so I thought let's see. I went back to all of Rani's dance routines/performances and she can do everyone too. And she's trained in Odissi or something like that. So I thought why not ask? 😆

Originally posted by: -enchanted-

Ummm why has this thread become about how inferior and unsuccessful Ash is as an actor to Rani, rather than comparing their dances... I for one dont find Rani that flawless and perfect as an actor. And Rani has more than her fair share of flops. She did many disasters and mediocre movies during 1999-2002 with the likes of Govinda ,Bobby Deol and Salman. Her career was going through a very difficult phase when Saathiya came along in 2002 and provided a new lease of life to her career. Following 2-3 yrs were her best and she did very well with Chalte chalte, Hum Tum, B and B, Black etc. But after KANK she again started giving flops like Ta ra rum pum, thoda love thoda magic, dil bole hadippa, aiyaa, laga chunri me daag... Who killed Jessica was her only venture worth talking about in that phase. This box office record is far fronlm consistent. And yes while she was very good in some movies, she was also mediocre in many.

Yes Aish has been inconsistent , given bad performances and movies, her choices have been poor, but she also has been able to step up her game and deliver when required, be it HDDCS,Taal, Devdas, Khaki, Raincoat, Guru or Jodha Akbar. She also tried to experiment with her roles without sticking to any particular bannner, some of them worked and some not. So Aish is not that disastrous and incompetent as an actress as made out to be.

Originally posted by: -enchanted-

@Mighty Zeus: I am not calling Aish a brilliant actress, but she is not terrible either. IF undervalues her a lot as an actor. Given the right script and the right director she can totally deliver. She is a directors actor. She gives her best when there is a director with a complete vision to guide her through. And yes she cant do comedy. About off screen conduct and peersonality , I totally agree her dignity, in every circumstance, is commendable.

About Hrithik, he was not bad initially. He was very good for a debuntant in KNPH and Fiza and Mission Kashmir really showed his worth as an actor. But in between he lost his way. MPKDH was cringe worthy.

Originally posted by: -enchanted-

@Mighty Zeus: I am not calling Aish a brilliant actress, but she is not terrible either. IF undervalues her a lot as an actor. Given the right script and the right director she can totally deliver. She is a directors actor. She gives her best when there is a director with a complete vision to guide her through. And yes she cant do comedy. About off screen conduct and peersonality , I totally agree her dignity, in every circumstance, is commendable.

About Hrithik, he was not bad initially. He was very good for a debuntant in KNPH and Fiza and Mission Kashmir really showed his worth as an actor. But in between he lost his way. MPKDH was cringe worthy.

Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais

This, all the way.

The only way that IF mirrors real life is how much people underestimate Ash as an actress. She's very good given the right script but she isn't brilliant. But to take away her excellent work in Choker Bali, Raincoat, Taal, HDDCS & JA is being very unfair!

Hrithik I can't compare to Ash at all be/c he's leagues ahead. He's a very good & very talented actor whose problem seems to be his OTT perfectionist attitude. He was cringeworthy in certain movies MPKDH being foremost. But excellent in others like Fiza, JA, Mission Kashmir etc. IF undervalues him as an actor too, which I don't understand at all.