A 100 crore question - Page 2

^^^ Hmm... you have a valid argument. And this is why you are supposed to diversify your investments to spread risk.

The 100 crore flick that cost 50 crore.

Which movie has a budget of 2 cr these days unless it's a B grade?😆

I think a GOOD MOVIE is better than any of these numbers lol

A film making the most money possible is the best 👏👏👏

the 100crore thing is a bit too much these days.. its not abt content but about popularity..

Bipasha touches on this topic in her interview

the 50 crore project is a bigger risk, therefore the return is bigger (dollar returns) Although in percentage returns, the 2 crore project has a bigger profit to expenses ratio.

Personally, if i had the money, I probably would invest in the 50 crore project, given that in the economic market, it has a bigger chance of success.

This 100 crore crap is so annoying. If the film is good then great and if the film can make a profit for the makers then even better. Don't see why such categories are needed 🥱

i dont understand maths and the % calculations

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

But you are only focusing on profits, not on ROI.

Producer X and Y both have 50 crore each.

Producer X makes One Big budget extravaganza and puts it all in. Gets 100 Crore returns. 50-50+100=100

Producer Y makes is cautious and makes small budget movies only. Gets 20 crore returns. 50-2+20 = 68. But Wait this is only if they makes one movie. What if he put it all in. Then we get 50-(2x25)+(20x25)=500

But you will be like not all movies can be hits. 80% movies are flops. The big budget dud rakes in 25 crore at BO. The small budget dud rakes in zero.

50-50+(100x.2)-(25x.8) = 0 crores

50-(2*25)+(20x25x.2)-(2x.8) = 90.4

In the long range forecast also Y is a better strategist than X. In the long run he will be richer.