Better looking Deepika or Madhubala

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

starstruckk

@starstruckk

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#31

Madhubala.

Deepika seems to have this uncanny resemblance with quite a few people in my eyes..for instance, somewhat with Esha Deol, a little bit with Aishwariya etc. She has nice face features but Madhubala's are just more extraordinary.

Edited by starstruckk - 11 years ago

Quote

CeaselessBanter

@CeaselessBanter

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#32

Both are beautiful, but Deepika is like a skyscraper while Madhubala is like the Taj Mahal.

Enduring, ethereal beauty wins. Madhubala.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

CeaselessBanter

@CeaselessBanter

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: VanBuuren

So she automatically transformed from this to that? 😆

If Deepika was born in the 1950's I bet people would be taking her name.

And Marilyn Monroe went from this to

being the gold standard of what people imagine a blond bombshell to be. Even now decades after her death people still remember her long after other people should have replaced her as the standard for the blond bombshell. It is about more than an era, it is about enduring. Deepika is beautiful, but is she an enduring beauty where people will single her out long after she leaves the spotlight and after death. Doubtful. Ash maybe.

Quote

Banana

@Mr.Chief

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: MR.KooL
Cherry is more beautiful😛

She should probably get that asthma checked out😆

Quote

HarveySpecter

@HarveySpecter

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: meribaat

And Marilyn Monroe went from this to

being the gold standard of what people imagine a blond bombshell to be. Even now decades after her death people still remember her long after other people should have replaced her as the standard for the blond bombshell. It is about more than an era, it is about enduring. Deepika is beautiful, but is she an enduring beauty where people will single her out long after she leaves the spotlight and after death. Doubtful. Ash maybe.

That picture I used in reference to the comment which said they did not spend time on make up, which is a ridiculous statement. Because they were literally caked up in kilos of white make up.

Very nice that you bring this up. I had been itching to talk about this for a long time.

These people, be it Monroe or Madhubala, died at a very young age, in their 30's. This attracts sympathy from people and they are 'remembered'. Not just them, take Divya Bharti for example. She died at 19 (as her family claimed). But what was her actual contribution? A few shitty movies that's it. Or the latest case, Jiah Khan. No one even talked about her, let alone praise her. Suddenly we see threads calling her performances in Nishabd or Ghajini BRILLIANT. Why was this so called brilliance unacknowledged until her death? Because it was not really. It is people's emotions speaking, not their rational minds.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#36

Madhubala was always iconic in every way. She doesn't get praised just out of sympathy of her untimely demise!

Quote

Ume Salma Kakal

@sunflower52

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#37

Madhubala was one of those women who might not have perfect features but had that grace & charm that made her a beauty. A very strong aura.Even without makeup Madhubala was a good looking woman.

Deepika might have good features but she lacks the charm & grace. Also she looks ordinary girl without makeup and her pictures not photoshop.

Even Aish has good features but again she lack that charm.

Now a days all the actresses photo's are photoshopped.