Will the Khan's ever beat Dev Patel? - Page 9

Originally posted by: meghasingh

hahahaha...no dear I am talking about dollars. Do you seriously think everyone is dumb like you? Seriously I mean why would i even bother to bring the economics here had he been rich in Rs.? like W*F? now its useless to argue with a person who doesn't know anything about anyone, but just knows how to rant around. like seriously rather than making silly assumptions you should first go and have some knowledge abt wht u r saying. btw u r a typical fool ...even when not knowing anything, dancing nd partying on ur own silliness. btw wait u nd ur few supporters, i do ahve a question... are u people from west always so dumb? not knowing anything but just just swelling in ur fake pride and unable to see anything or anyone?

i loved SM. rveryone on this film was awesome

Originally posted by: meghasingh

Did you just said regional actor? Who are you...some UK, US person? For whom the wold is only Europe and US? I had never seen someone so silly like you...Like dude or babe, whoever u r, Los angeles times said SRK is the most famous movie star, BBC considers him the most known celeb around the word. so i am not quoting any indian or "regional" thing..

Originally posted by: meghasingh

And this is for the TM and his/ her ignorant supporters.
about economics i'd already given a lecture, so won't go there. in short economies are different so this is the reason that in BW 200 cr mark is something huge.
And if you talk about talent, dear I'll not talk abt the three khans, but only one..SRK. achha lemme ask u one thing, he's in HW nah..how many oscars has he won? bcz srk is in BW and he has won the max no of filmfares and in BW filmfare is equal to HW. about being rich..hayee...*banging my head in the wall* guys have you been to school? or ever had known anything like GK...or common sense? forget it..yeah sweeties srk is richer than depp or cruise even when we see his net worth in dollars. and i think it proves that BW stars r no less. esp when being in a third world country he can be richer than ur HW stars then..what do i say?

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.

BW filmfares is equal to Oscars? 🤣🤣🤣... oh boy... you are a funny.

Economics ki baat chhodo, first you need to learn basic numbers, you still can't tell me which is the larger number, 1500 or 200?, this is basic maths, Jesus Christ!, you should've learnt this in school. 😆

Slumdog won 8 oscars, how many oscars has SRK's film won? 😆... Slumdog grossed 1500 crores, when was the last time an SRK film grossed over 500 crores? 😆😆.. aur baat kar rahi hai superstardom ki. 😆

Mohalle mein cricket khelne waale , aur duniya ke international cricketer mein bahut farak he re... Dev Patel = Tendulkar. 😎

Do you even got what I said? I know there is a whole f**king difference in the economies of HW and BW. and another thing, SM was a HW movie, and this is BW. for me i dont care abt oscar a bit bcz it is from HW, for HW movies, why the hell should BW even look for oscars? for HW or western approval that they are good? They should rather improve BW, and slowly slowly they are doing it.
So no comparison bw SM and any other BW movie, bcz of the economy.(I seriously cant believe you are that dumb) Dear here everything is on smaller scale in comparison to HW, and so is price of movie tickets, so how can you even think that a BW movie will score like a HW movie?

and superstardom...wo toh i gave you data about net gross, even though here economy is not like of HW he's much richer than much better stars OF HW, leave ur nobody, dev patel. and its not dev who has won a single oscar for himself, its his movie, so he has not any role in other people's effort.

and oh my hw come you remember sachin? lmao...dear quote some western player na... i mean really ughh..what u have to say abt all the data and all...ughh i forgot, what can you say? You dont have anything to say actually except crap...

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.

lolololzz... you're so ignorant. In what currency does SRK get paid for his films and extra-curricular activities?, US Dollars or Indian Rs?, if he could become richer than Johnny Depp while being paid in rupees, then why can't he break Dev Patel's boxoffice records? 🤡... you don't know anything about ecxonomiczz. 😆

Time to eat humble pie. 😳

Dear he gets paid in Rs. only. He's so rich because of his business. through business people are rich in india...do i ahve to say anything abt ambani's and all? though not that like them, but he is a businessman and he makes money through them. he ahs a PH and VFX company, IPL team and many other things.

🤣

Quite a scholarly debate on the economies of India and the rest of the world.

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.

lulz...are you one of those people for whom India is the start and end of the world?, ofcourse he's a regional actor. lol

Los Angeles Times may have said that but >99% of the people of Los Angeles have never heard of him. 😆 and everytime he goes to the US, the Americans detain him. 😆... and BBC just parrots whatever the Indian media says.

Truth is, you put him in any part of the world minus South Asia, and no-one would recognise him. 🤣... regional actor kahin ka.

and what is the population of los angeles? i m certainly not a person for whom india is the beginning and end. I know where india stands and i certainly don't exaggerate unlike you. I humbly said that BW is not of that scale what HW is.
about americans detaining...they detain everyone who is muslim. Even indian president and scientist APJ kalam has faced that. well you may be proud of this fact, but I won't like if india would ever do this with anyone... J. depp or T. cruise or Dev patel.
And if they don't know then why los angeles times said that? Why he was included in newsweek most powerful personas Top 50? and wow..now u are accusing ur own institution...great. The truth is he does have a fandom...huge fandom. and this may be ur mentality to insult people this way not seeing where do you stand, not mine.

and why economics ki baat chodo? 1500>200. what is the currency? just because you see things by western standard, you will say such silly things? W*F? do one thing, $1= Rs.65
so to see had not there been the difference in the economics of HW and BW, and both had been equal, consider $1= Re1
that means you ahve to approx divide 1500 by 65 and that will be 23. 07 hahaha...that means SM just earned 23 crore...lmao...so in case you indian and western economy has been of the same level, where is ur Dev patel..oh...? and man you are so dishonest...1500 cr. is the total money SM earned worldwide, and CE earned 400+ cr...u reduced that to 200, just the indian collection😕 heights of dishonesty...now what do you have to say?

and for another thing i think most of the western people can afford movies, but in india, not everyone... because there is much population below the poverty line, who forget abt movies they dont ahve a decent life.

Originally posted by: Bossman

🤣

Quite a scholarly debate on the economies of India and the rest of the world.

No its about the economics of India and US. not rest f the world. There are countries which has weaker economy than india, and they too exists on this planet.and its about the comparison bw the US and India, i.e. HW and BW.

and then some egoist westerns come here and blabber nonsense, completely ignoring everyone else. As if only the rich persons or countries or industries have a right to live peacefully. (btw even by that standard i think all the khans will beat dev patel in being rich and yeah in dollars too...) so if make a world on western principals of "be rich or die" Dev patel too will be no where in front of khans...hahaha...

moreover i am unable to understand why he is being discussed here when he's not even a part of BW. Why not compare him to any of HW star, on a HW forum?