Can we OFFICIALLY say BEBO is successful after MARRIAGE?!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#61

Kareena is so unsuccessful, she has a film with Hrithik Roshan and Emraan Hashmi 😭

And she let go of Zoya's film coz it clashed with Shuddhi, but she was offered the film coz she's so unsuccessful.

But sure, lets all hail Bhansali for kicking her out coz of her marriage. That's what it should be. Who needs married women. No what Kareena should have done, is put off all her personal commitments for Bhansali ji's convenience.

Power to Kareena for standing by her beliefs.

And she still gets big projects coming her way, so well...whatever. 😆

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#62

Kareena Kapoor have already allotted their dates for other projects in March/April 2014, which is when Akhtar wants to shoot this film.

http://www.boxofficeindia.co.in/new-a-lister-opposite-ranveer-singh/

Shuddi or Zoya's film?
Tough call.

But why they offering to an unsuccessful heroine like Kareena?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#63

As for Kareena and reviews, she doesnt get bad reviews. Her getup may get criticized, her character may get criticized, but it's a given that she can act, and act damn well.

She's not known as the non-actress of bollywood 😆

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#64

Originally posted by: anku-

Himani, let me know if you saw me or Desu in these 6 pages calling Bebo #1 😆😆

That's it. None of Kareena's fans have claimed her to be #1.

But the topic asks if she's still successful after marriage and the answer is an obvious yes.

She's right up there, in the top 3 bracket.

Quote

SunoNa123

@SunoNa123

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#65

She looks even more beautiful after marriage, she was fantastic in Talaash .

Her acting was good in Satyagrah , i had a problem with the character she played, and the way they kept it look unreal from dressing to getting a reporter involved in such circumstances.. It looked unreal to me..

Otherwise i hope she does well atleast a few more years, has the looks and talent . Why should being married be a issue..

Quote

SunoNa123

@SunoNa123

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#66

And i hope certain things change in BW, the mind sets of ppl need to change.

If they actor is appropriate for a certain role then why not take them without paying heed to if they are married or not..

We are ready to see men of 45+ age romance 20+ actresses, we get crazy fanatics for men even if they are married but when it comes to women, her career should take a back seat just coz she is married??

One of the reasons i get excited when Madhuri, Juhi, Sridevi sign movies. They look gorgeous still for their age and have so much talent. It was so nice to see Sonali do a small role in OUTIMD, she looked so beautiful and did well.

Kareena is much younger to them, i think she just needs to concentrate on scripts at times. Most of times its the characters she plays that gets the flak ..

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#67

Originally posted by: -sylph-
She looks even more beautiful after marriage, she was fantastic in Talaash .
Her acting was good in Satyagrah , i had a problem with the character she played, and the way they kept it look unreal from dressing to getting a reporter involved in such circumstances.. It looked unreal to me..

Otherwise i hope she does well atleast a few more years, has the looks and talent . Why should being married be a issue..

Pretty much what critics said.
But see, even this is below the benchmark for Kareena.
If her review says she acted well, that's not up to par for Kareena Kapoor. According to her standards, that's criticism. But objectively, obviously she's gotten positive reviews.

When does she not? 😆

Quote

pakeezah

@pakeezah

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#68

Thank goodness katrina didn't do SatyaGrah.

Otherwise the selfsame persons defending Kareena

would be tearing Katrina apart for looking 'unreal'.

Ranbir refused Zoyas film, kareenas value went down.

Casting depended on pitching real life siblings in reel

life.

That wasn't happening, so Kareena was dropped.

Anyway, her PR immediately released statement she

didn't want to be cast opp Ranveer, that's why she opted out.

Everyone read it here on IF too.

Yeah, right. Willing 2 do a minuscule role in SatyaGrah, bt she

will leave a protagonists role in a Zoya Akhtar film.

The two movies she got are both sugar daddy's tohfas.

I'm betting had there not been a Karan johar, there

would be no Shuddhi. Nor OUATIM. As it is look at

The fate of the other film. If distributors pull the plug,

on this one, Imraan was SO miscast, that movie too gone.

Edited by pakeezah - 12 years ago

Quote

pakeezah

@pakeezah

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#69

Originally posted by: desigal90

Pretty much what critics said.
But see, even this is below the benchmark for Kareena.
If her review says she acted well, that's not up to par for Kareena Kapoor. According to her standards, that's criticism. But objectively, obviously she's gotten positive reviews.

When does she not? 😆

Bold

KKKG - OTT😆

MDK - routed by Rani

Chameli - didn't pull off part, another miscast

Aitraaz - routed by PC

Ajnabee - routed by Bipasha

MPKDH - cringe cringe cringe!

Edited by pakeezah - 12 years ago