BIG B named The Greatest. SRK at Third Position

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#101

Originally posted by: BeShArAm

If she deserves this acknowledgement
then Katrina deserves a filmfare
Kareena deserves a national award
and PC effin deserves an Oscar
just bcuz she was the top actress of her time that doesnt mean she was the best too

All of these above stated actresses are not equalent to even 5% of Madhuri's talent, persona, aura and overall impact as an actress/performer/dancer and entertainer.

Edited by tanya.91 - 12 years ago

Quote

LapinLaCocotte

@MostlyHarmIess

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#102

Originally posted by: tanya.91

All of these above stated actresses are not equalent to even 5% of Madhuri's talent, persona, aura and overall impact as an actress/performer/dancer and entertainer.

And you are clearly a delusional fangirl

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#103

Originally posted by: WhiteNights.

If awards werent corrupted in 90s trashy performances in KKHH,RH,DTPH wouldnt have got best best actor/actress awards😆

so u mean she was not good enough to get awards for Dil, Beta, Hum aapke hain kaun (anjaam was also nominated), dtph, devdas ...?
and someone like kajol deserves all awards for her screechings and OTT shoutings in k3g, kkhh, ddlj, and especially Mnik ?
and karshma for her routine filmi acting for raja hindustani 😕

no u were saying that corrruption in award functions started post 2000 so i brought these performances/movies to show that corruption was always there. And coming to madhuri's awards , i dont think she deserved it for DTPH

In my opinion awards for all three movies, DTPH, HAHK and Dil were bakwaas. She was overrated in these movies. Tell me what is so great about her role in HAHK or DTPH?

Its not only about author-backed roles, but HOW an actor performs and translated it to celluloid. Acting is not just about out of the box roles, but making ordinary roles extra ordinary... even in a single HAHK she has shown like 1000 expressions ... acting just comes naturally to her...she do it with so much ease that she became that character ... not like Sri whose every performance seems like pure filmy and is quite visible that she is acting it out.

Edited by tanya.91 - 12 years ago

Quote

Tanya

@tanya.91

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#104

Originally posted by: BeShArAm

And you are clearly a delusional fangirl

Is that what left with u in defense... personal attacks on members ? 😕
ask a majority, and they'll give u the same answer... maybe more than half of India's and overseas' population will come across as DILUSIONAL people to you...coz a huge majority shares the same sentiments for the ultimate queen of Hindi Cinema... i.e. Madhuri Dixit.

Quote

LapinLaCocotte

@MostlyHarmIess

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 12 years ago

#105

Originally posted by: tanya.91

Is that what left with u in defense... personal attacks on members ? 😕
ask a majority, and they'll give u the same answer... maybe more than half of India's and overseas' population will come across as DILUSIONAL people to you...coz a huge majority shares the same sentiments for the ultimate queen of Hindi Cinema... i.e. Madhuri Dixit.

You know what I am done with this nonsense

If you are not gonna understand facts then whatever

BTW Majority thinks Vyajantimala,Rekha, Hema Malini are true queens

Oh and Sridevi too😛

Edited by BeShArAm - 12 years ago

Quote

pathaka

@pathaka

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

#106

Originally posted by: tanya.91

Its not only about author-backed roles, but HOW an actor performs and translated it to celluloid. Acting is not just about out of the box roles, but making ordinary roles extra ordinary... even in a single HAHK she has shown like 1000 expressions ... acting just comes naturally to her...she do it with so much ease that she became that character ... not like Sri whose every performance seems like pure filmy and is quite visible that she is acting it out.

errr yeah...

the same logic can be applied in sridevi's case with the likes of chandni , judaai and laadla...

everyone has a preference as to whom they like better...and thts fine...

but ruling out sridevi's acting as being too "filmy' while madhuri being a natural?

if anything, I consider the case the opposite way...sridevi was uninhibited,natural and fearless in front of the camera which is why she could master something as difficult as comedy...

Quote

MR.KooL

@MR.KooL

Achiever

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#107

where is Sunny leone 😒

Quote

narchibald

@narchibald

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#108

Madhuri ahead of Waheeda Rahman,Nargis,Dev Anand,Rajesh Khanna and Sridevi 👎🏼

Quote

MR.KooL

@MR.KooL

Achiever

+ 3

Posted: 12 years ago

#109

Smita Patil too deserves to be in Top 10.

Quote

rockon

@rockon

Beginner

Posted: 12 years ago

#110

Originally posted by: DAKDAK

It's okay it people power 😆

It is debatable that SRK and Salman are bigger star than Aamir overall but it is fact he is a better actor , has done better films than these two

That what I care, and he deserve to in top 10.

kahen ka fact? khud ke babae hue facts??? Aamir is pseudo intellectual and uske fans bhi uske jaise...abe hata sawan ki ghata...put SRK and aamir in a frame together and SRK will act aamir's pants off...😆