Should Kat Be Nominated for Rajneeti? - Page 7

Originally posted by: ana1

My answer is a big fat NO. But no one looks at preforamce anymore its all about the hits. Rajneeti was a hit but with or without katrina it would ahve been a hit b/c in my opinion she had no real role in the film. Get any other x,y,z actress and the outcome would ahve been the same. Ppl thought she was so great becasue she "acted" serious in the film...so what!

hopefully the nominations are fair and the winner is well deserved. but knowing past winners and nominations it wll be the complete opposite

Originally posted by: desigal90

No, because this is an award show. You're supposed to be rewarded on your acting. If mediocre performances start being nominated just because you actually had to do SOME acting, where are the standards?

That way, someone can start off WAYY BELOW average, and be nominated in their second year just coz they mastered one expression. And what about someoen who was good to start off with? THey dont have her popularity, but htey're obviously better than her. But since they're not a mainstream bollywood actress who finally did something differnet after 6 yrs of monotonous roles, you dont even deserve a slot?

I'm sorry but why should Katrina be given such special treatment? Just coz so far she coudnlt do mediocre acting, why is she being placed on a pedestal just for encouragement?

Its cut throat competition. Its sad enough that the so called "actresses" today are such showpieces, it'll be an insult to start nominating mediocre performances just for the sake of encouragement.

Originally posted by: sweet coco

well I wouldn't be surprised..b/c there have been some very crappy nominations like Ash being nominated for Dhoom 2...what was that about...no doubt I was happy, but you don't see the Academy nominating Angelina for Tomb Raider, Megan Fox for Transformers, or Charlize for Hancock!!!

Filmfare def has lost merit in the past and award shows nominate those who the ppl want the like and want to see nominated, but not those that are truly deserving!! I mean not all of the nominations aren't truly deserving...that's not my point, but the ones that aren't deserving in any context when they get a nomination it really makes me question the jury's decision!

Originally posted by: Nuktaacheen

considering Rajneeti was heavily promoted with Kat's name... i highly doubt it would have been a blockbuster... so she did play a huge role in the status of the movie at the box office... 😛😛😛

however, the movie itself would probably not have been effected if it was any other actress...

and looking at some of the past nominations, i'm sure she will get a nomination... though, i don't think she'll win... my bet is on ash or kareena for the popular category (probably kajol, but i have my doubts)... and vidya for the critics...!

Originally posted by: Nuktaacheen

considering Rajneeti was heavily promoted with Kat's name... i highly doubt it would have been a blockbuster... so she did play a huge role in the status of the movie at the box office... 😛😛😛

however, the movie itself would probably not have been effected if it was any other actress...

and looking at some of the past nominations, i'm sure she will get a nomination... though, i don't think she'll win... my bet is on ash or kareena for the popular category (probably kajol, but i have my doubts)... and vidya for the critics...!

Originally posted by: KatForeva

Completely agree! It would have not been a blockbuster without Katrina Kaif! Its the truth, just think about it for a few minutes!

Originally posted by: Debo_afg

Do you really think that?😕

If people only accept a movie because of a cast which hasnt any role in the movie, I think then we are blind. Rajneeti had a very strong story, a small role as Kat wouldnt make any diffirent. Her role could be taken by any celebrity, still the movie will has a blockbuster!!!

Originally posted by: laly