Can I just say, and let's be honest now, Filmfare is nothing compared to the Oscars. Here's why: Filmfare chooses nominees based on box office revenue while Oscar nominees are chosen merely on acting and critics. That's why a film like A Single Man got nominated even though it wasn't a "bloackbuster hit". Let's be honest an actress would never get nominated for doing a romantic comedy with a pinch of drama at the Oscars, and if nominated(ex Meryl Streep for Julie and Julia) would never win. But Meryl Streep is like a demi-god actress with the most nominations in the history of Oscars and she's her own category. But I think saying that Sandra got her Oscar so late and Kareena got her filmare ONLY after 7 years of acting is crazy b/c an Oscar has more merit than filmfare!Originally posted by: lensahunte08
I love how these kareena haters like to jump on whatever she says. Just because you like someone else does not mean u bring bebo down to bring your favorite actress up.
And why is it wrong for kareena to compare herself to sandra. Last time I checked Sandra just got an Oscar after being in the industry for so long and kareena got a filmfare award in 2007. Sandra is no better actress than kareena. So I don't see what the issue is about.
And if Aish can win a Padam Shri why can't Kareena? To be honest kareena is more versatile and better actress than Aish. Aish is only good in princessy kind of roles.
And for people who say that kareena is saying she is the best and blah blah blah where in this interview did she say she is the best?
People Stop twisting kareena's words and making it to something negative.
And to say she is not intelligent, ARE U HER PROFESSOR OR HAVE U SEEN HER IQ? 😃
Case CLOSED!!!!!!!!
Its also funny that u gus have this more than 9 pages when there is something negative to say about kareena. But if a postive thing come out of her mouth no one cares. 😉
6