'deepika's a good looker, but shes a bad actress'

Frequent Posters

Rishani

@FreeBird03

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 16 years ago

#11

Deepika was good in LAK! she has improved a lot!

Quote

Larae

@Larae

Rocker

Posted: 16 years ago

#12

i agree with him but he could have said it in a tactful manner

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

anna

@anna143

Sparkler

Posted: 16 years ago

#13

so whats wrong with that it is true. Half of her movies are dubbed not even in her original voice. Just admit it do you see that girl being the next madhuri or Ash. I dont think so shes just like the other new girls with a hot body and a nice face. Her acting is terrible and I cant even stand her real voice maybe bcuz of her accent.

but taran shouldve been more nice about it! oh well he is a critic thats his job to bash ppl.

Edited by anna143 - 16 years ago

Quote

Hira

@friends_rock

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: qwertyfied
i guess he hadn't watched LAK then..cuz this is what he wrote abt her in his recent LAK movie review:

"Deepika looks ethereal. Most importantly, in LOVE AAJ KAL, she acts very, very well. Matching up to Saif is no mean achievement and she does it in several scenes. This should be the turning point in her career."

I can understand some ppl are highly frustrated by the fact that "kal ki aayi"/"bf stealer" Deepika Padukone, who everyone loathes with a passion, is bagging accolades from everyone(how unfairrrr, rite??). Don't try to dig too deep for the negatives...if Deepika has the potential to make a critic eat his own words, aam junta is her "daaye haath ka khel". Live and let live 😉

😆😆😆BANG ON!!!