Armaan Kohli as child artist: Pix don't lie - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

43

Views

9.9k

Users

23

Likes

304

Frequent Posters

yellowflower thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#41
He's 47 as per Wikipedia.
Cotswolds thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: --GODFATHER--

In 1981 he was a child , and in 2013 he is childish / -

That shows how well he has grown up in all these years @ -



😆😆
gopiManchurian thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#43


Quite possible.

In the last scene of "Badle Ki Aag" [1981], which could have been shot in 1980/81 he looks 13-15 years as against the starting shots in which he could be around 10 +/- 2.

In those years, movies could easily take 3-4 years to make due to various reasons. It is way more efficient and professional today. Mr Kohli, the senior, was into multi-starrers and his movies took very long to complete because of date issues of all big stars he used to rope in.

There sure is a considerable difference in Armaan's looks and physique in the two roles he played in the movie.
rani-lucki thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#44
tanisha should listen to arman when he said kuck seeko pointing to gaura
then tanisha will not be a doormat

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".