Why audio not video?!

Ok i agree Jasmin over reacted

But why did BB only play audio and not showed the video? 100 cameras hain so why not give a fair chance to Jasmin too instead of justifying Rahul only..why not show the strength Rahul used to pull the bag ?

I feel bad for Jasmin ...it could have been balanced argument but it was made one sided in favour of Rahul

Rubi..Abhi and Jasmin are definitely better friends then the other gang and more loyal

And Pavitra ..she chants aurat this aurat that in every task.... expected Jasmin to give up ...Did Puniya ever give up in a task? ..she is no one to question Jasmin

What difference it would make if video is shown ? We all saw nothing dangerous in his eyes, And he applied force to take bag from her ( which was still not enough), she fell and he could have immediatley snatched it from her but no he let her sit and attempted again ...

So everytime Jasmine has a fit we are to prove to her via video /audio and face analysis by experts. You think that would have made a difference? And then what is the measure of his facial expression that will show malice? What if he was blankly staring at her? It’s a dangerous slope when you accuse a man of violence against a woman, it’s a heavy accusation.

She had already made up her mind because she hated him.

I don’t support this you should give up, I support you should try your best and the other team regardless of gender has the right to try their best. It’s a task and everyone fell, she didn’t want to give up and props to her but accept your loss and move on.

Audio or video she never gonna accept that she overreacted

Usski pin eek jagaah aatki hai Maine uskee aankho mai dekha aaree kyaa dekha

Originally posted by: Deviant_Pixel

So everytime Jasmine has a fit we are to prove to her via video /audio and face analysis by experts. You think that would have made a difference? And then what is the measure of his facial expression that will show malice? What if he was blankly staring at her? It’s a dangerous slope when you accuse a man of violence against a woman, it’s a heavy accusation.

She had already made up her mind because she hated him.

Then what was the need of the audio also? I am talking about fair chance here...

If she felt threatened then that is her call..just like i cannot decided what is threatening for you vice versa ...

What i see is that she gets triggered when she feels men try to intimidate her

Originally posted by: M.A.K123

Then what was the need of the audio also? I am talking about fair chance here... If she felt threatened then that is her call...

I cannot decided what is threatening for you vice versa ...

They could simply tell her it was not a threat

And more than threatened it was her behaviour later which was abysmal. She didn’t even go to him and tell him I didn’t like how you spoke/your behaviour was vile. It is her call indeed like it is Salman’s call to rightly bash her on her behaviour which btw was very subdued.

She first went aggressively without his permission touched him on his shoulders in a very physical manner, is that ok? She then went jumping infront of him in a non task environment. Threw water on him. Shouted and swore, did she once try to tell him that I felt so and so after calming down. No.

Originally posted by: Deviant_Pixel

they played it for her as she was hell bent, you think she would have even believed salman? There is no fair chance everyone saw the video already in the audience. And then people would have looked at his face, analyses his expressions, I guess people don’t realize implication of such acussations. She can throw it around due to her triggers but what if it f*** up the other persons life and he didn’t do anything? Who will account for the cyber bullying then?

And more than threatened it was her behaviour later which was abysmal. She didn’t even go to him and tell him I didn’t like how you spoke/your behaviour was vile. It is her call indeed like it is Salman’s call to rightly bash her on her behaviour which btw was very subdued.

She first went aggressively without his permission touched him on his shoulders, is that ok? She then went jumping infront of him in a non task environment. Threw water on him. Never even said sorry on wkv.

Of course what she did was not ok ..that is why i said she overreacted but there have been many incidents in past in BB which could have been cleared by BB but they never did so what is so special about this situation?

I am just giving her benefit of doubt because she has been victim of sexual assault in past ... And that is why i feel it is a bit insensitive to rub this in her face as clearly she has issue with men who try to intimidate her (ejaz and Rahul) ...whereas there are other ways to tell her Rahul did not mean any harm

Why was even the audio clip necessary? Because Jasmine madam and her friends think they’re judge, jury and executioner. People don’t become guilty courtesy Jasmine’s “feelings” and “mujhe laga intent” and blah blah.

A five year old could tell you Rahul didn’t threaten her - but she, with her gang, not only accused him of such, but stretched it over days and labeled him a criminal.

As far as I’m concerned - even the audio clip was unnecessary. But kya kare - Sallu ko toh Jasmine madam ko baby karna hota hain.

Khud toh she was talking on similar lines to Eijaz in the buzzer task - ke his kneecap would get injured and what not. But when it comes to her, then tone, aankhon mein intent and what not.

If she has triggers, one can respect that - and that she would react, but it doesn’t issue her a free pass to vilify somebody all week and even on the weekend refuse to accept that she’s in the wrong. A past trauma doesn’t excuse her from the need to be rational, particularly after she’s had time to calm down.

Originally posted by: M.A.K123

Of course what she did was not ok ..that is why i said she overreacted but there have been many incidents in past in BB which could have been cleared by BB but they never did so what is so special about this situation?

I am just giving her benefit of doubt because she has been victim of sexual assault in past ... And that is why i feel it is a bit insensitive to rub this in her face as clearly she has issue with men who try to intimidate her (ejaz and Rahul) ...whereas there are other ways to tell her Rahul did not mean any harm

I agree I felt she was genuinely triggered also after hearing about her past to some extent but the issue is that she is stubborn and to an extent has gone down the rabbit hole and cannot come out of her prejudice.

Lekin then it’s not fair to the other male contestants, either they will have to lose the task on purpose or be ready once again to be accused by her. Everytime it will happen and everytime she loses, some evidence will have to be given to convince her. It is a tough one for her and for others.

Originally posted by: SP2684

Why was even the audio clip necessary? Because Jasmine madam and her friends think they’re judge, jury and executioner. People don’t become guilty courtesy Jasmine’s “feelings” and “mujhe laga intent” and blah blah.

A five year old could tell you Rahul didn’t threaten her - but she, with her gang, not only accused him of such, but stretched it over days and labeled him a criminal.

As far as I’m concerned - even the audio clip was unnecessary. But kya kare - Sallu ko toh Jasmine madam ko baby karna hota hain.

Khud toh she was talking on similar lines to Eijaz in the buzzer task - ke his kneecap would get injured and what not. But when it comes to her, then tone, aankhon mein intent and what not.

If she has triggers, one can respect that - and that she would react, but it doesn’t issue her a free pass to vilify somebody all week and even on the weekend refuse to accept that she’s in the wrong. A past trauma doesn’t excuse her from the need to be rational, particularly after she’s had time to calm down.

Absolutely her comments to Eijaz on knee cap she totally ignored that and dumb Eijaz won’t remember to even bring it up 🤣

I also felt the way she cried she was genuinely triggered to some extent and then she’s gone so far in her actions she doesn’t know how to dial back. However as you said sab iske past ke prisoners abb nahin ban sakte.