🤗 Don’t remind me of that Jodi, Jyo! 😆 And indeed, if we could ship that, these guys should be grandparents by now 🤣
Yeah. She did. She said so probably to instill further confidence in Sid that Paras was a closed chapter for her. Sana’s face was zoomed in so many times by the cameras to capture any stray expression when Salman was whipping him- there was no real worry. She was mostly blank and she showed more emotions for even Madhurima 😆 . But her attachment talk which was nothing but a formality and reference over their initial phase went against her in all likelihood.
Madhu talks in her interview that Sana never liked anyone to be cornered- she’d always support if she felt anyone was being grossly targeted. Sana knew that her dad’s visit was somewhere causative in the WKV war on Paras and she cleared it for him so that he could move ahead. Would have been excellent if she had sat Siddharth down and said she wanted to do this. Right? I feel Sana feels that since Siddharth talks with PaHira quite closely, she also thought previously that Sid’s mind is completely clear on her own position regarding Paras and it is only of late with the barbs coming in that she may have felt that there are insecurities. And hence her Kal statement.
So yes, Sid took it like she hadn’t had closure perhaps. That’s a very strong impasse actually between the couple if Sid has taken it so and needs to be openly sorted out.
Uma thats the reason i feel ..U dont want to see anyone in your kal if u hv strong feelings or emotions fr him or her ..thats how sid takes it bec he thinks deep ...
Thats where rashmi took sid name bec we know they had a past and it affects her ..sana took paras name and here sid took in that sense too ..
Sid took sana name when easily he could hv said rashmi but rashmi dont affect him , sana does...so u get the gist ?
Sid or even rashmi ka definiton of kal here is diff than sana ka definition bec sid and rashmi hv same age bracket ..thats the prob here ..
Book Talk
Anupamaa
