Is the current a real incident or CVs creation

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Pankhudi

@..Pankhudi..

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

Thanks for the info friends.

Quote

katana

@katana

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

Please clear my. Doubt. How come Jalal call himself as. Akbar at such a young age?? Is this serial fictional??? 😕

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ami

@bitblue

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: katana
Please clear my. Doubt. How come Jalal call himself as. Akbar at such a young age?? Is this serial fictional??? 😕

its big blooper even how on the earth he can call himself king of Hindustan as he just have part of India and at this young age he should be busy fighting his own people in north and taking care of BK bad behavior.

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: katana
Please clear my. Doubt. How come Jalal call himself as. Akbar at such a young age?? Is this serial fictional??? 😕

His father gave him that name Jallaudin Mohamad Akbar

Akbar was Hamida banu's father name

Jallaudin was one of Babar's original name

Its a lie that people gave him title Akbar

Yes but he was only two kings of india known as great one Ashoka and one Akbar and why? because of their reforms and religious tolerance

Edited by myviewprem - 11 years ago

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: bitblue

its big blooper even how on the earth he can call himself king of Hindustan as he just have part of India and at this young age he should be busy fighting his own people in north and taking care of BK bad behavior.

I think that was title borrowe from his grandfather Babar and father Humayun -Shehenshah

Whoever ruled Delhi was usually the King of hindustan before like Prithviraj etc does not matter how large their kingdom was???

Quote

katana

@katana

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: myviewprem

His father gave him that name Jallaudin Mohamad Akbar

Akbar was Hamida banu's father name

Jallaudin was one of Babar's original name

Its a lie that people gave him title Akbar

Yes but he was only two kings of india known as great one Ashoka and one Akbar and why? because of their reforms and religious tolerance

Why there is no specification of his name in JA? Even in movie they show as people gave that name Akbar

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: katana

Why there is no specification of his name in JA? Even in movie they show as people gave that name Akbar

Not sure but Akbar is hamida Banu's father's name and humayun gave him that complete name

Akbar was his birth name and not given by any citizen

May be writers want one extra scene but that is not correct history

Anyways like shabaz khan said serial is 80% imagination and 20% truth that is correct. Like how jodha is given credit for all akbar's work in serial which every one know is not correct. Akbar started reforms in his 30s(he had a epeliptic fits after that he became quiet liberal) once he had kids and not because of Jodha's advice etc.

And maharana pratap shown all good ans shakti as all bad that is again incorrect as per history they both fought alot and had major issues. pratap was not so self sacrificing towards his brothers as shown in serial.

Edited by myviewprem - 11 years ago

Quote

katana

@katana

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

#18

Thanks myviewprem 👍🏼

Quote

saaniakh

@saaniakh

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#19

its all CV's creation as they will tell what they want to show to viewers in their own way of writing and direction and also creating stuff for their advantage one proof is how they are showing Akbar in an evil way as in reality Akbar was very kind ruler

Quote

ami

@bitblue

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: saaniakh
its all CV's creation as they will tell what they want to show to viewers in their own way of writing and direction and also creating stuff for their advantage one proof is how they are showing Akbar in an evil way as in reality Akbar was very kind ruler

sorry akbar was not kind ruler he was smart ruler for sure. just look back in history how may war happen because of his dream to become shahensha of hindustan. i dont think so they are showing him wring. and views are appreciating jalal.

Edited by bitblue - 11 years ago

Quote

1 2

Is the current a real incident or CVs creation - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics