Search of Truth Part 40 updated page 149 - Page 47

Shruti, apologies if this sounds blunt, but would you then consider paedophiles and other perverts as merely having a mental problem and curable by acceptance and love?

Would any parent allow a paedophile near their child? If the paedophile had a fetish for girls (and not boys going by his history), would you still allow him near a boy child/teen?

Of course not!- Nobody would believe that they are reedemable, and would consider them dangers to society. People would then justify the mother's behaviour as protective, but nobody sees Vandana's actions that way. She saw a lady with a potentially explosive past walk into the life of her son, who hadn't quite seen the dangers of the world, and chose to try and keep him away from it.

The doctor at Maya's trial said she was perfectly fine, with presumably no mental illness, and as clever a person as could be. Maya can also, in her own words, know she's doing wrong, but continues doing it.

It is weird to compare a mental illness with a physical one. While one could argue that some minor mental illnesses can be cured, some others go beyond redemption and it's practically impossible to bring them back on track because nobody knows how the brain works, and whether it's actually been cured or not.

I can't possibly see how you can compare Saanjh's anxiety issue with Maya's psychopathic, obsessive one.

It would've needed an exceptional set of people, who stay as per Maya's boundaries and devote her life to her, and completely sacrifice their way of thinking to live as per her ways, to keep Maya from straying even the tiniest bit. In normal society, that's unfortunately not possible.

Saanjh's problem is not one that requires people to sacrifice their way of thinking and adapt to completely living life the way she wants it.

And u talking about assurance Shruti? Didn't 3 yrs give her assurance. Who was there to take away Arjun from her in those 3 yrs they lived without the rest of the family? If at the end of 3 yrs, ur husband is annoyed and done with u, when he has nothing or nobody else to maintain relationships with but u, fault is in u. Not in the husband or society. Still Maya baby didn't keep quiet at just having Arjun to herself. She goes ahead and plants Samay in Saanjh's life knowing fully well how crazy Samay is. Tell me, is this also society's or Saanjh's fault?

Aekiel, it's medication and therapy which might help, even though there's no surety. But the first step, is always, acceptance.

Also, even Maya was shown to have severe anxiety in S1. Now she's a perfectly fine mentally healthy person?

@aekiel coming to your question on paedhophile and perverts you never know what happened with them, but they did crime and should be punished for their crimes. And if such a person has crossed my path and punishment is given, I dont go again in their front and declare after your death, my life will start with arrogance.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@fernandes Maya has not accepted to Maurtius Pandit death and the murder of Vikram. When she spoke to Arjun the day he wanted to murder her, he accepted everything else. Ashwin, Jhanvi, Vandana, what she did with Ayan, Samay anyways Arjun saw but she didnt accept these 2 murders. There is something abt these 2 murders why it is hidden. Because adding 2 more murders to the list doesnt make any difference for Maya.

Coming to burning Rajiv, it was her punishment for Rajiv for using her vulnerability. When he had power he burned her, when she had power she burned him. They were more or less equal partners in crime or whatever. Dont keep Rajiv an innocent victim.

By the way guys I remember someone telling when Maya fell her blood fell only on one of 3 pebbles. I checked that episode, yes Maya keeps the hisab of her crimes taking pebbles and when she falls there are 3 pebbles in line, but blood fall only on one. I still dont know what to make out of it, though some guesses are there.

For me her biggest crime would be the moral responsibility in the death of Prem and second trapping Ayan. But still unable to connect that 1 pebble.

How can you ignore her sinister design in Mansi's death -the only one she admitted in an open court hearing?!
A girl was lured to death -just what you expect a typical psycho would do to her victim!
Priest's death was a mystery with a circumstantial evidence of Maya's missing ear-ring found near by place of incident- I mean, in temple premises! Maya is a suspect just like Jailor's case! The difference is, in Jailor's case we saw it, but police has no clue! In priest's case, no one saw it, but something connected Maya's ear. . .sorry her hand in it, probably! She had a motive to kill him as she was clearly displeased with his advice to Arjun!
Rajiv's case, it was just back-stabbing after he gave her shares in exchange of what she 'agreed' to trade-off! It was a deal! So, no question of taking revenge on him!
He saved her while she lit the match-stick! It was his proof of standing with her!
But she didn't! It was her betrayal! She did not murder a person but murdered the trust!

Originally posted by: lumos_31

We are what we choose to be. If u have judgements about Saanjh Vandana and co. being the way they are, it implies u acknowledge the fact that they chose to be this way. Why such special treatment for Maya then. She too chose to kill, chose to torture, and chose to deceive, chose to not cure herself. If u can't accept that, then u can't point fingers at Saanjh or Vandana or Arjun, imo.

Although murdering someone is a crime still I was okay with it when Maya murdered Ashwin because Ashwin was the one who abused Maya when she was a child and he was trying to kill Arjun...Maya killed him for 2 reasons in my opinion...One coz he could have told the world about Maya's truth which meant that there a chance that Arjun could have left her and second he tried to kill Arjun.

I used to empathize with Maya in season 1..I was ok with the fact that she murdered Ashwin.

Originally posted by: HadhSeZyada

Lumos, shruthi is comparing the timelines side by side. The five year leap is yet to come. Only then her analysis plus comparison will be valid with what you said about assurance.

Now, it sure asf was Maya's choice to kill. She chose not to cure herself. But wasn't it too late already? And the way that the events took place, it sure was her fault. Shruthi never denied that. And if you look closely at what shruthi says in her thread, you'd know that she condemns Maya for her doings. She gets frustrated at Maya for choosing to be what she's become. But it stands undeniable that there had been a lot of catalysts. Not responsible, but people who acted as a catalyst. It's the smallest of small decisions which shape the future in a most haphazard yet mysterious ways. Even a tiny deviation from an action can lead to a whole new reaction.