Crime of highest order - Page 2

If anybody likes maya due to jenny s acting that fine but why justify her acts which are criminal acts and instead call saanjh a criminal. This show there is lack of judgement. A character should be judged only on their actions.

@TheUnique We all love the way Jenny's portraying Maya. But there is a difference in loving an actor and the character she portrays. Yeah, when Jenny cries she makes u want to sympathise with maya. Does that mean u should sympathise with her or support the wrong things she does(especially when it is so clear that maya is cunning and manipulative)?

There's no way i like Maya due to Jenny, if that was the case then I would also have liked her past characters which i don't

Originally posted by: muskiii

There's no way i like Maya due to Jenny, if that was the case then I would also have liked her past characters which i don't

Coming to the topic: being a lawyer, if stopping an only eye witness from coming to court is not criminal then i don't know what it is???

And Maya is called a criminal based on assumptions (which MAY or MAY NOT be true).

Originally posted by: anshvi

What Saanjh did was wrong and foolish...Samay would have been summoned by police as a witness in the court any which ways coz police knew about him..the prosecutor would have called him too.

This shows that she needs to brush up her skills as a lawyer

But a criminal ?

Umm...why did the judge not punish her if this was the case..judge could have given her some form of punishment but this was not the case.

But

As per u Maya cannot be called a criminal Coz there is no proof against her...Yes agree that she cannot be called a murderer coz it is not proven yet.

But Maya drugged and tied Arjun...she inflicted wounds on her own body and tried to commit suicide only to stop Arjun from leaving him.

And this has been proven right...so shouldn't be called a criminal too then for mentally harassing Arjun and for drugging and tieing him up against his will ?

Originally posted by: anshvi

What Saanjh did was wrong and foolish...Samay would have been summoned by police as a witness in the court any which ways coz police knew about him..the prosecutor would have called him too.

This shows that she needs to brush up her skills as a lawyer

But a criminal ?

Umm...why did the judge not punish her if this was the case..judge could have given her some form of punishment but this was not the case.

But

As per u Maya cannot be called a criminal Coz there is no proof against her...Yes agree that she cannot be called a murderer coz it is not proven yet.

But Maya drugged and tied Arjun...she inflicted wounds on her own body and tried to commit suicide only to stop Arjun from leaving him.

And this has been proven right...so shouldn't be called a criminal too then for mentally harassing Arjun and for drugging and tieing him up against his will ?

Maaya did really wrong and yes she should be punished for whatever wrong she has done (whether we Maaya supporters like it or not) and should not be punished for the ones she hasn't .
Since the writers haven't shown anything clearly other than Arjun's abduction I would leave her with that.

Coming to Saanjh, trying to hold a eyewitness from going to court, or affecting his statement is a crime as per Indian Law.
As for the judge, I don't expect much. I mean she said "Ayaan Sharma ko jail ki saza sunai jaati hai"
She did not even mention the years, aisa lag raha hai poore zindagi ke liye jail bhej degi Ayaan ko 😆
So I am not surprised that the judge did not say anything to Saanjh.

I love Jennifer's acting and for me she is the best performer of this show.

Is Saanjh asking Samay to stay away from giving evidence in the court wrong?
Is it a criminal act?
Not at all!
Did she obstruct him? She asked him not to do!That is all! There is a big difference! Samay is an independent person with a free mind! He can decide his action! He is not obligated to favor anyone! Eventually if he decides a particular action, that is purely his decision & possibly prosecution would have requested him to do so! Even prosecution can not compel him to give evidence! He can always decline if forced by anyone!

Now, is she right in asking to do such a thing! There are two perspectives here!

Saanjh as a defense lawyer will pick & choose what is useful & helping her to win the case! She is a professional lawyer & obligated to favor only her client. Not any body else!
It is for the court & prosecution to apply their legal wisdom & assimilate the presentation made by defense!

Did Saanjh as an individual & not as a lawyer do a right thing when she asked Samay to help? Saanjh is in a relationship (may be, still under development) with Samay! if Arjun can blindly support his wife, why not Saanjh then, if she is going to marry Samay at some point of time in future?

It is her conviction that is important here for her!
She is convinced that Maya is a pathological Manipulator!
She has a very bitter experience to believe so!

Her close ties with Sharmas' family & knowledge of Ayaan's conduct makes her feel Ayaan is not capable of doing that!
Who can argue with her, if she listened to her conviction & decided to fight it out on the court legally?
She has not obstructed justice to maya here! She is not anyway going to oblige maya!
Nor maya is expecting her to do any favor!

If one tries to improve her winnability, it is called a tactical move!

Originally posted by: _Darling_

Saanjh is a criminal. Hiding a witness to manipulate the case is crime. Just because the judge didn't arrest her doesn't mean she's not a criminal. The same judge also didn't say anything hearing and Maya herself accepting her forcefully taking Arjun with her and injecting, etc.

Also, for Maya to get arrested for abducting Arjun, first Arjun himself needs to give consent to charge her and make her arrested. It's his call, not others. But he himself is fine with her and still loves her. So what crime when the victim himself has forgiven or/and fine with her?

Originally posted by: manya_roy

Maaya did really wrong and yes she should be punished for whatever wrong she has done (whether we Maaya supporters like it or not) and should not be punished for the ones she hasn't .
Since the writers haven't shown anything clearly other than Arjun's abduction I would leave her with that.

Coming to Saanjh, trying to hold a eyewitness from going to court, or affecting his statement is a crime as per Indian Law.
As for the judge, I don't expect much. I mean she said "Ayaan Sharma ko jail ki saza sunai jaati hai"
She did not even mention the years, aisa lag raha hai poore zindagi ke liye jail bhej degi Ayaan ko 😆
So I am not surprised that the judge did not say anything to Saanjh.