Harshad's live with anu ranjan - Page 9

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

Empires don't stand tall in a day. Rule of business world is to change before it's too late. You really think, once they lose the market, they will get it back like that. They would shut.

We don't worry about them but why do you have this urge to defend them anyway. You happen to be the only one doing it here. Ekta herself said that she would never watch the shows she produces ever. These people eat in a 5-star but want us to eat in 2-star because they think we don't deserve it.

As a public forum, one can discuss what IV said.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

U r analogy is false ..entertainment should be left to masses ..they will decide what they want as long as decency limits not crossed as determined by gov of India

As for education cleanliness it's basic fundamental right of citizens ..to demand fro government

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

So if A count is 20 and C class is 100 ..what's wrong if channel choose 100..it's market theory ..why blame Channel

Harshad should not spoil his revenue but channels should do experiments and sacrifice revenue for minor audience

WHAT IF every actor producer director stop taking money for 2 years and do it free for channels and channels can experiment for 2 years with Less revenue innovative so called progressive serials and if after 2 years trp is abysmal then channels can go be k to their so called regressive stuff ..sounds good right

Originally posted by: Flame.

Yes. It should be left to the masses and not a tiny section of the audience with 30,000 meters in a country of 1+ billion. Why should we let those 30,000 decide for the rest of us?

Originally posted by: glorious

Them prioritizing the so called class C and the repurcussions of it is what we see in ITV today. A lot of members already pointed out how certain story line,character sketch, abusive content etc are affecting people and their lives( specially when they find it difficult to differentiate between reel and real, fiction and reality). Entertainment industry should be responsible when such stories are promoted. Ofcourse they can look for profit.it's a business they dont have to run a charity institution.

Again, I'd like to point out what was said in the FB live, that the actors as professionals do certain roles, stories out of professional liabilities even if they don't like it. That's their job.income.bread and butter.

And why would any producer /actor take up work for free wen a programming change can include progressive shows too.. Why suggest them to do free work anyway.why feel cross about that..

Also, no one said to ignore / not make shows for Class C. They are also consumers, n they deserve to watch the shows they like.

Can't the channel bring in sm changes and include shows for Class A and B too? Yes, it'd affect profit , but eventually it'll pick up. Thats why it should b a gradual process not an abrupt change which could be suicidal for any business .They can bring in shows that can cater to all these classes. It'll add on to the popularity , audience count and credibility too.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

So what a guy who has maruti cars prod company Wil never buy maruti ..he will buy tesla or rolls Royce cars ..so what

Let channels do their business .or get closed .why we worry about them why we asking them to produce shows what I like ..they will go by majority

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Typical saas bahu story reveled this extra marital stuff is like old wine in new bottle and now came to to original plot saaas bahu where saas is sadistic a d won't think twice to kill bahu haha

NOW SAAS BAHU FAVORITE ENJOY THE SHOW I AM QUITTING

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

It's literally useless to argue with the way you are hell bent on defending channel. I hope ITV floods with more of such content to further stereotype the Indians choice of entertainment.

May the future generation grow up normalizing things against which world is fighting now.

Best of luck to us.