Harshad's live with anu ranjan - Page 3

Originally posted by: Harshadholic

Something is really wrong here. Sms chgs are from 1 to 3 per text

I do not know the figure last year but they give the total number of votes recd. This was close to 1.7.votes for popular voting

Sms again fans will not prefer unless most of them have switched to jio where there are free sms packages

Is she referring to 17 crores in total for all categories. ??

Have overseas fans also voted ?

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

Who is blaming BARC for manipulation. I know how statistical sampling can present a picture that may be far from reality. Among 3 kinds of lies in the world- Statistics is one of them which is not exactly considered a lie technically but doesn't present an actual picture as well. College say 100% placement with so & so package while I know what's the truth to that since I have been part of Placement Office Team back in my college for 2 years.

There are only 30k meters in some billion households in the country. Look at the ratio. One figure implies millions at the same time. I didn't say those 30k meters are tampered. Read that again. But are 30k meters enough to give an actual picture. Digitization makes it possible to detect transmission & receipt of signal for every minute (and that is not attack on privacy since signals are global & limited to selective transmission). How are foreign countries measuring the exact no. of viewership of their shows at a time without these meters. Technology is already there to do that with the help of satellite signals.

Main GEC channels are still 7-8 only since 2000s. So, one has to admit that TV audience has decreased significantly in this decade with the seep in of Internet. Even in 2012-13, some shows had TRPs of 6-7 at prime time. And the trend is likely to continue with the way independent apps are coming up with refreshing content on Netflix, Amazon Prime, Youtube Originals & other independent digital apps.

As for mocking, even Pakistanis & Turkish make much better shows than us with all their cultural ethics intact & realism in them. Stories are not recycled unlike here where recycling is fun. Leave apart western content, most of our content can't compete with their Asian counterparts whose cultural values are more or less very similar to that of ours.

These same channels were thriving with great content back in 90s & even now those shows are in people's mind. And content must change with times.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

See j told u the way trp calculated in 2012 us differeng yo the way they f calculating now..so don't compare

I don't know what technology u f talking .. USA also follows the sane system like us except there are more meters ...so it's the same ..here barc does .nthete nieoson does it ...

Ok I feel barc should take 30000 to 10 lakh metrs for sufficienttt sampling Yo mAt h neildon ..but procedure is same

https://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/question433.htm

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

Sampling ration has to change here & so should the content genre. The no. of genre explored in west or foreign can never be compared with the genres explored here. Here we explore only 1 genre most of the times- Saas-Bahu with almost same script in every other show. Now there is trend for supernatural with almost same elements. Sometimes, mythos & pseudo-historic gain a trend.

Shows here are made for only a certain section as if rest don't exist. There is literally no experimentation. One genre catches up & everybody jumps to same boat, not thinking that it might end up sinking the boat for the worst.

Foreigners are coming to the country & telling us on what shows to make & earning their revenues. While our own channels & media houses don't want to cater to the set of audience which is switching to that content.

Nothing wrong with daily soaps, but there is slot & limit to it. There should be a limit to episodes, story & the way it is presented. But here, people follow a trend, like it's supernatural now, so everyone bring up a script with supernatural content only.

ITV has reached the saturation in so many things. And channels can't thrive over that saturation for long. Besides, sampling has to change. Everyone at some point should get a chance to be part of sampling survey as it happens in US & UK unlike here.

They can't always be like Oh but people are watching this sort of content only. When there is literally no experimentation, what choice are people left with. And this interference in story from channel in such unexpected manner should also go.

In short, ITV has to revolutionize before it's too late. Bollywood has begun the process already, hope they do too.

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

TRP is coming from only some 30k meters. In a country of of huge population, you really think targeting only that section will work. Everyone is paying for these channels. And if this continue, people are gonna cancel the subscription. Channels earn money from subscription too. Actors can switch to Internet if they get good scripts too over time like Ram Kapoor, Barun, Sanaya & so many others.

In a place where TRP system is rigged, it needs to be pointed out. Otherwise it will never change. International audience mocks most of our shows.

Audience who watch the good shows doesn't even contribute to the so called TRPs & that proves that shows with literally good content are not popular. India has sensible audience who can recognize good shows, that's why Zindagi shows became a rage. But this audience doesn't contribute to TRP. And such audience will increase only in future.

Channels themselves should work up for improvement of TRP system rather than caving into more regressive content to cater to selective audience. Even people in villages with Internet connection are switching to Internet content.

And if channel give it some time, things will change for the best for them only. But their short-sightedness to earn quick profits leads to interference in the story which leads to completely ruining the story.

Back in 2000s, EK shows used to get TRP of some 22 points. Now, at most they get 4 pts. It speaks a lot about audience TV has lost. In some 10 years, these channels won't get over 1 with the way Internet content is seeping in.

Channels are digging their own graves only with the way they are turning out to be. They might not even end up
capable to do charity if they
don't revolutionize.

If TV shows are popular online then it counts since urban audience finds net more feasible with their life style. That means this audience is not contributing to TV but it is contributing to Online revenue collection. And for heaven's sake, let a director & writer show their story without interfering. They know what they do.

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

See market forces determine what is what ...TV channels know how many f watching TV and how many watching Netflix ..they have data

If really people who watch internet content ate huge than TV watching guys then def itv will put that content on the ..you and me need not tell them

Back in 90 maintenance expenses low salaries low ..so they need not care for much revenue ...

Now every think skyrocketed ..so now revenue important ..otherwise they have yo close channels

Finally our speculations that more people watching Netflix might be wrong...TV guys have data ...they show what huge majority want ...

Originally posted by: thelastsuspect

Glad he got 60% thoroughly deserves it
Or deserves even more 😆
He is the first celebrity that I voted several time and my voting for him increased when ita didn't put him for best actor jury 😡
He deserves all of the awards
It's about damn bloody time he wins those awards 😆