HIten is the only one who spoke the truth about DM - Page 2

Originally posted by: mombasa00

LOL Mallika you are too funny!! 😆

Only one of them has to be adopted and problem solved.

Originally posted by: Opti

👏Well said. 👏Couldn't have said it better!

Yes, it is a gross unfairness that H-K relationship has to suffer because of DM-Santo relationship. It is amazing how people accuse Hiten and Khemi of committing a crime for falling in love and equate it with relationshipships which are not really relatable. The hard fact is that DM married Santo not because he wanted to give a life to a young girl who was left in the alter on tha day of her wedding but because he not want to suffer losses in business. As you pointed out he treated Santo abominably. I think his treatment was worse than Motiben's because she did not make any bones about what she thought and felt for Santo whereas the guy made a show of being a good husband when he was with his friends and business associates but went back to be a 'Maalik' when they weren't around. Oh yes, he is slowly changing and that required tremedous sacrifices from Santo. He has not yet reached the stage where he has given her the full right of his wife. So when the man who got into this relationship of his own accord has not yet fully recognised it, why would his son recognise it, treat a woman who is five years younger to him as his mother, and by virtue of that treat her sister as saali and hence stay away from her? If he does not, what is the crime he is doing?

Yesterday we saw what is DM's and Santo's real objection of H-K union. It is not that Khemi is Hiten's maasi but that Khemi is maanglik. DM says that he married Santo because of her Kundali ( which was supposed to be strong). How selfish and trivial can the Maalik of Dharampur be, marrying a girl for the sake of his business and his future propsperity by virtue of her kundali. If he had married Santo to save that girl from disgrace or give her a life, I would have appreciated his deed. But his reason seems to be utterly selfish. Yet, Hiten marrying for love is termed as selfish by many. Hiten was willing to give up his love because he thought she was happy to marry Shambu. But after he came to know that she was terribly unhappy about the marriage, he was determined to marry her and is perpared to face any hurdles. Now how can that be selfish?

For those who felt he is doing this only to irk DM, let me remind you that Hiten has a lot of respect and regard for DM just as DM has a lot of affection and pride for Hiten. The problem is, both do not reveal it to each other. Hiten has stepped up and defended his dad's honour on several occassions. Yes, he is critical and cynical of him in his presence because he has witnessed DM's brash brand of justice disposal like in the cow slaughter case. Also after Shubi's death DM seemed to have wrapped himself in his work rather than be a support to his children who were sorely missing their mother. DM is realising that of late and trying to make amends but Hiten has not been around to see that change because he was in the village serving his brother's sentence. So when he stubbornly says he will marry Khemi, it is not because he feels thrilled to go against his fatehr but because his father was preventing him from achieving his happiness. When DM can marry a girl young enough to be his daughter for his selfish gains why not Hiten?

Ronit is a fantastic actor which is why many of us like to see him on screen with anybody, even a girl as young as Santo. An incongruous story involving 18-50 is palatable because many of us think of this as fiction. By the same stretch of imagination why not also accept H-K, forgetting that there is a quirky relationship, because from what I have seen of the show so far, not once has the 'maasi-bhanja' angle been brought in. After all, this is a work of fiction and not real life, where, as the poster said, many of us cannot digest a relationship like that of DM-Santo.

Originally posted by: tvrasika

Imagining love scenes between DM and Santo? Well...I don't know whether that is what love is all about. I would be happy not to see very graphic scenes if you know what I mean. There are different kinds of love. Thankfully Bandini has enough couples to satisfy us all. so no complaints there.

18 yr old marrying a 50 yr old 'twisted'? Massi-bhaanja relationship not 'twisted'? We can keep on arguing about this till the cows come home! let us just say some people prefer one 'twisted' relationship over the other. which is fine. each one to his own. But in order to justify one preference, let us not demonise the other. Let us accord equal respect for all characters.

Why no one is referring to the 'maasi-bhaanja'relationship? Because they know the twist and we don't 😆

May be BT writers are too embarrased to say it loud themselves! 😆