Pratyusha Banerjee Commits Suicide - ALL DISCUSSIONS HERE ONLY

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Madhuri

@Viswasruti

Moderator

+ 29

Posted: 9 years ago

#341

Originally posted by: Stephi
I do not understand in what way he is right.Not necessarily a girl will talk about her pregnancy even to her best friend. This statement of his doesn't prove absolutely anything. In contrast to his statement '' I was in good relations with her parents from the very beginning'' it was reported that Pratyusha had told Rahul during the phone call: "You cheated me, separated me from my parents...Now see what I do." Rahul then requested the actress to wait until he reached home, and that they would talk then.''So how come he was in good relation with her parents if Prats herself told him that he separated her from them!? The least one would expect would be his answer ''when and how I did it'' . Instead he requested her to wait until he reached home!?
Secondly , he also alleges(in his defense)''If I was torturing her, then why she did not mentioned this to any of her friends?'' She did mention this to her friends and wanted to t file a case against him.

Her friend Leena Dias gave her statement (which was recorded by the police) .She said that Pratyusha had called her the night before and told her that she did could live like this anymore. Leena told her that she would visit the next day, however boyfriend Rahul forbid her to visit their house. "Around 3 am on April 1, Pratyusha had called me up. She was in tears and told me that she could not stay like this any more. Pratyusha said she wanted to get out of the relationship. I tried to calm her down and said I would visit her. Just before leaving my place, I called up Pratyusha again. But this time Rahul answered the phone and told me that there was no need for me to come and that he would handle things. "

So , I wonder why Rahul is lying about his good relations with her parents, why he left the hospital with his as well as Pratyusha's phones,(what is it that he was affraid of),why he forbid her friend to visit their house etc.
Anyways ,regardless of this case it has been proven that Rahul
has cheated many other girls,used to befriend girls only for their money, charm them and then get them addicted to alcohol and drugs. So no matter what he says he is far from being a sweet little innocent.

Stephi , you are absolutely right . Agree with all your points .

I am surprised , why people are convincing themselves that Pratyusha , who was a victim , a sufferer , a hapless girl who was trapped by this convict in a meticulous way and tortured by him and murdered by this liar , and now talking about so called facts and findings ? It is the lapse of our system , now painfully viewing by the entire world that why police are not arresting him , why they did not arrest him on the same day[ i.e April 1st ] itself ? Why allowing him to bark like this ?

Edited by Snehamadhuri - 9 years ago

Quote

Stephi

@Stephi

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#342

As far as I understood many things about him surfaced only after Pratyusha's death. Those cheated girls themselves come forward with the truth.( among other things.)I suppose that the police did some research too -as it is required by the procedure in such cases.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Madhuri

@Viswasruti

Moderator

+ 29

Posted: 9 years ago

#343

Freedom of expression in India recently is taking dangerous turns , by twisting the law to make new amendments to benefit the convicts .

Ofcourse by law ,a prosecutor should not make or authorize the making of an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication if the prosecutor knows or reasonably should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of prejudicing a criminal proceeding. The prosecution function should be performed by a public prosecutor who is a lawyer subject to the standards of professional conduct and discipline. But here we have to give due weightage to the strong feelings of that lawyer , the conscience of a person which prevents him to do wrong things . That is the main cause for his ex- lawyer's distancing himself from the case , which stands right in the eyes of law . There are certain rules as well as some deviations / amendments too in the Indian Penal Code . An efficient lawyer can unearth , entwine , adjust the proceedings acco. to the law of the land , and can argue on the basis of crime and conscience !!

But one main point here is , the convict[ Rahul ] has no right to criticize the public outcry for his criminal attitude towards the deceased person [ Pratyusha ] for which he was convicted . The case is pending and he is liable to follow the rules of the court , which he violated by giving public statements in an outright manner and insulting the sentiments of public .😡 For which , anyone of us can file a case against him , PIL [ Public Interest Litigation case ,] Article 32 of the Indian constitution contains a tool which directly joins the public with judiciary. A PIL may be introduced in a court of law by the court itself (suo motu), rather than the aggrieved party or another third party.

he was attracted to her money and fame , she believed him for his fascinating way of impressing her by putting a birthday poster on the highway ,[ with the swiped money from another girl ] and for arranging her Birthday party in a grand way [ later we realised that he did not pay money for that !] At least at that stage she has to cut off from this treacherous liar .

Just imagine , if he threatened her with some video or of that sort , what she could do in such a situation ? He allured her , deceived her , tortured her , murdered her , no need to think for even one second , that was not a suicide , it was a murder , if it was a suicide , who ransacked her room later ? Who deleted the messages and conversations in that same evening ? Why , so many wounds on her body ? If he loved her sooo [ o faced fellow , used three 000 there😡] much , then that tiny life which started it's journey to this world must be so precious to him , why he wanted to end it's life ? Just imagine , neighbors in their statement , that afternoon they heard her wails , crying etc , imagining her plight at that time and my heart is bleeding , my soul is crying inconsolably , he has to face the curse of all her fans , no escape for him , even if the legal system fail , even if the money win the life of a sinner , but one day he has to face the curse , then he will remember , how he made her suffer and how he killed her .

Edited by Snehamadhuri - 9 years ago

Quote

Vidya

@Shinya

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#344

I had already highlighted where he was right.

Let me put it up again -

He is right in questioning why the friends did nothing if they knew he was torturing her.

He is right in asking why the parents changed their statement 2 days after their daughter's death.

And he is right in asking why the parents did not stop her from living with him.

He might be a criminal. No one is giving him a clean chit. But his arguments are right.

The so-called friend Leena, if she was genuine enough and a friend in the first place, should have spoken to the police first and waited to give her testament in the court, not to the media... Media was not going to give justice to pratyusha.

The parents and the industry people actually made a joke of her death, that is what he is pointing out.

Quote

Stephi

@Stephi

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#345

In my country, the media and public pressure have a very important role in their demanding that the police and law resolve such cases.
Leena was ready to record her statement with the police however the police told her to come back later on several occasions. That's why l said the media have a very important role. People should use all possible means.
Now, He shamelessly put the blame on her friends. Her friends did not live with her but he did. If she had any problems, if she used to drink alot like he shamelessly said after her death ( he accuses her friends that her death have been portrayed as a joke by them but now he speeks without hesitation about her drinking problem !?) so if he loved her so much, he was so good to her why HE never called her parents and asked for help. I mean, he was in good relations with them, wasn't he ?
If she was unhappy, had any kind of problems, he should be the first to notice that and ask for help. Not her friends or anybody else but he, himself ,her boyfriend who allegedly loved her so much .

Edited by Stephi - 9 years ago

Quote

Madhuri

@Viswasruti

Moderator

+ 29

Posted: 9 years ago

#346

No Shinya , if he shouts loudest , it won't be considered as truth or convincingly correct .

She is no more to present her point , that's why he is talking like that .

A culprit has no right to argue with the public .

He distanced her from her friends , then from her parents , then stopped her from meeting any other one except the maid, Saloni and himself . Swiped her money from bank accounts , proofs are there , even he swiped 1 . lakh 3 /4 days prior to her death from her account .

This is not an argument , it is sheer pain , thinking loudly about this case from all angles .

Just think once , if he videotaped a scene which any girl on earth didn't like to share with anyone or see it again herself , what she could do in such circumstances , except accepting his demands and commands ? There are many criminal angles in this case , he meticulously distanced her from the outside world , then cornered her , when she realized the full truth and wanted to come out from that entwined situation to reveal the true color of this person to the world , he shut her mouth forever .

Yes , agree with you , believing a criminal , knowing fully well that he had many relationships prior to her , still having some girls in his life , maybe she was blinded in her love , or was threatened by this man , sacred to imagine what was her situation at that time , how she suffered because of her helpless condition , yes she did a mistake and perished like many young girls in this world , but we the viewers lost a great actress , her friends lost a good friend and esp her parents lost their only daughter . They were the most punished persons for their sin , for allowing her to live with this cruel person . No one is saying she was innocent , but is it correct to blame her for her death ?

I am a grieving viewer of this actress , have no issues with any persons in this IF , but yes, I am a feminist and like to express my views and to criticize the responsible persons who made a girl to suffer and die .

Edited by Viswasruti - 8 years ago

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#347

Why would an independent, working lady agree to distance herself from all? Rahul was not even her husband. If he was such a bad person - where was the need to agree to his irrational demands?

Quote

Vidya

@Shinya

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#348

@stephi, agree that media play an important role, but their role is only to cause awareness among people and to follow up the event persistently till justice is done, like they did in Jessica Lal case.

In jessica lal case, if not for the media, the killers would have gone scot-free as they were the sons of influential people.

However, media does not give justice to anyone. It is the job of the court.

By holding press conference, what did the friends achieve? What they said in the conference is called 'hearsay', is there any evidence for it?

Quote

Madhuri

@Viswasruti

Moderator

+ 29

Posted: 9 years ago

#349

Originally posted by: SPuja
Why would an independent, working lady agree to distance herself from all? Rahul was not even her husband. If he was such a bad person - where was the need to agree to his irrational demands?

Out of sheer stupidity , super sensitivity towards love, a firm belief which is deceiving the girls since centuries .

If she was wrong while loving a cruel and cunning person and perished for her mistake , it doesn't mean ,doesn't make that convict a sane and morally correct person and automatically made her a sinner and arguing on the basis of , 'she deserve such punishment for her belief in love' , and automatically he gets a right to twist the truth and insulting public sentiments and sensitivity of her friends by him .

If a person has chosen to walk on the dark road by preference and attacked by thieves and criminals , is it justified by asking-- who told him to walk on that road at that time? It is his Karma , but there should be a punishment to the culprits for doing the crime .Isn't it ? The offenders have no right to blame others .

Edited by Snehamadhuri - 9 years ago

Quote

Vidya

@Shinya

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#350

Originally posted by: SPuja
Why would an independent, working lady agree to distance herself from all? Rahul was not even her husband. If he was such a bad person - where was the need to agree to his irrational demands?

Exactly, there is no clue to why she was living with him when she knew he was a bad person.

Why did she not report him to the police or ask for social workers help?