Unethical and unparliamentary behaviour - Page 2

Originally posted by: SPuja

Anandi has no right to slap Mangala. She had no right to slap even Pramila. Anandi should be slapped also if slapping M is right. After all, both had done injustice to Nimboli and what Anandi did was worse than what M did.

Well said. That's precisely the point.

Slapping someone to express their anger and disapproval for what she /he has done is not acceptable no matter who slaps whom.

Anandi is not standing up for nimboli, she is too selfish to do that. Anandi is still thinking of only herself.

Anandi's anger at Mangala would have been justified if Anandi had no hand in the troubles that Nimboli went through (including M's possessiveness for N and it's associated troubles.)

Many times people end up hurting their loved ones.

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Many times people end up hurting their loved ones. - So you are saying that it is perfectly okay if Anandi hurts Nimboli and puts her through high end stress. But the same Anandi is justified in slapping Mangala. M's faults are faults that deserves slaps, and Anandi's faults are not only overlooked but she also has rights to slap others.

Anandi is not the first one to do that nor is she the first lead in a TV show who had done that.

Was Anandi doing it for her selfish needs?- Yes very much. It was total and pure selfishness. Anandi only put her self needs and interests, and in doing so if the child was hurt, humiliated, subjected to death, lied to or was kept away from truth, was immaterial to Anandi. The only thing that mattered to Anandi was that "Nimboli should accept A without question".

Mangala also did the same stuff, as she wanted to "keep" the girl. So why is M wrong, but Anandi is not and also reserves the right to slap M?

Anandi's daughter was lost to her all those years ago. She eventually found the child but the child was found in a condition which no mother would ever want her child to be in to top it all the child is not too receptive towards her mother. The child has lost so much in the time she was away from her mother and there is a possibility of the child rejecting all that is rightfully hers in her anger and hatred towards her mother.

So should Anandi take the risk and tell her about her mother and see the child walk away from all not just her mother? - The same argument that people put for M is what I will put forward here. if Anandi had trust and faith in her love for N, N would have eventually come back, even if she first rejected A on learning the truth.

Anandi may have had her fears of facing her daughter's anger.But that was not the only reason why Anandi kept quiet.There is a risk of the child harming herself in a fit of anger and hatred against her mother and not to forget the self proclaimed mother whose interests Anandi was trying to respect.

Anandi may have been unwise but was her intentions intended any harm to any one?

There was Mangala who harmed the child intentionally purely for her selfish interests. Nopes - M was only trying to protect her interest, just as Anandi was. For this, M had to subject N to many wrong things, just as A subjected N to. Final outcome: Nandini's torture over the last 6 months were purely due to the selfish intentions of both the women who claim to be her mother.

So, Anandi is just as much or more wrong than M, and so Anandi has no right to slap M. She only did that out of frustration, and showed that she was indeed weak.

Truth is how one perceives the facts. I agree.

Anandi was trying to bring up the subject time and again.

Mangala fool anandi mangala try to seperate mother and daughter .she sow hatred of seed in nandini for her mother she kill trust of anandi so anandi did great job in slapping mangala .anandi cant give shabaashi after knowing managala is trying to seperate her from nandini mangala save nandini life only for herself .mangala does not save liife of nandini just because she want anandi nandini reunion

Slapping is a cheap behavior... It is an uncivilized way of dealing with another person and only a barbarian can resort to such a low behavior.

A civilized and a sound-minded person will first of all not take law in his hands and secondly would never hit another person and comit a crime himself.

Anandi has shown what low standards of values she has within herself... she may act as if she is a calm and a just woman... But deep within she is a coward and a bully. She certainly has no good values.

It is a shame that CVs showed their lead in such a poor light.🤢

Originally posted by: Shinya

Slapping is a cheap behavior... It is an uncivilized way of dealing with another person and only a barbarian can resort to such a low behavior.

A civilized and a sound-minded person will first of all not take law in his hands and secondly would never hit another person and comit a crime himself.

Anandi has shown what low standards of values she has within herself... she may act as if she is a calm and a just woman... But deep within she is a coward and a bully. She certainly has no good values.

It is a shame that CVs showed their lead in such a poor light.🤢

I agree with the bold.