Fundamentally wrong - Page 6

Enough has been said but I know one thing for sure. Had Anandi did exactly the same thing what everyone is saying. Had she said no to Sarita and went back home to leave her kid, Pooja would have ended up as Kundan's beendni and would have undergone everything what N went through.

They would have fled seeing the police , just the way Sarita's in laws were not tracable

One thing would have happened then also, Anandi bashing would have continued the way it is going on.

We have seen in news papers also, Child marriage in maximum cases have to be stopped when it is happening., otherwise it becomes difficult later on o prove. Whole village lies as if nothing happened. Had Sarita taken her later on they would have proved her mentally ill or something just to prove nothing happened or fled away.

It was easy in Urmi's case as there was proof of the marriage. If she knew about Urmi's marriage at the time when it was happening she would have gone there to stop it.

No mothers harms her kid intentionally

Now we need an exclusive anandi bashing thread very urgently! Instead of every thread turning into one.

Wow what logical criticism of Jagya

Why Jagya cant be criticised when he is committing some mistakes? There is logic in my argument and many tried to break that logic but failed.

His taking Nimboli, a minor with him to a dangerous place is illegal. As an MLA, he should take legal means.

Lols how Anandi 's stand during Pooja's child marriage is as same as Jagya's stand now ?

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

Why Jagya cant be criticised when he is committing some mistakes? There is logic in my argument and many tried to break that logic but failed.

His taking Nimboli, a minor with him to a dangerous place is illegal. As an MLA, he should take legal means.

Lols when i said Jagya cannot be criticized if he does same mistake but you are here forcefully putting mistakes on his head to give clean chit to Anandi for taking Nandini with her in pooja's child marriage This you openly admitted in this thread yourself

Had Jagya taken abhi , Mannu ,shivam with him too then he gets the blame but Nimboli is demanded by Akhiraj This is the last option Jagya has , He has no other option left , Nimboli herself wants to go , Nimboli's mother is going with him with her free will and taking her daughter too and Jagya has a full plan to protect everyone He did not leave without proper planning so i wonder why we should blame Jagya ,criticize him ?

@ One's child is one's property and no mother does anything intentionally to harm her own baby. If something happens to the baby, it is due to unavoidable circumstances. Nobody has any business to poke their noses between such a personal matter.

Mannu is Ganga's son and she did nothing intentionally to harm her own kid. As a matter of fact everything she did was to protect him.(Ratan's story) So what was Anandi's business to poke her nose between such a personal matter?As far as I remember Ganga was crucified for a simple question: with what right you made a decision regarding my child.
''One's child is one's property ''-I will not even comment on.

@His taking Nimboli, a minor with him to a dangerous place is illegal.

So Anandi's taking Nimboli ,a six-month old baby to a dangerous place is legal ?

Criminal negligence is the failure to use reasonable care to avoid consequences that threaten or harm the safety - in this case of her own baby. But I see, it cannot be applied to Anandi firstly because she is flawless,secondly Nimboli is her property . Only, what if six month-old Nimboli was killed by a stray bullet , then what ?Wouldn't she be liable for her child's death?

@ Anandi called up police before she reached there.
So it is not like she went there without taking precautions.
She did tell Ira that she feels it will not be dangerous because police would be there

So what was so urgent and necessary for her to stand there that too with the sick child in her arms? I mean, the police would be there doing its job.

Back to the topic