why cvs r not revealing truth to nimboli that anandi is her mom DN pg8 - Page 6

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Why people are clamoring for the social worker to do when there already is a noble soul in that family to fix things?😛

Why didn't Mangala go to Jhalra?

Isn't that family Mangala's family?

Why should Anandi plan? If Mangala could come and tell Anandi that villagers are not ready to give witness against Akheraj then why didn't she come up to Anandi and say that they should do something about Urmi because Kundan is getting released?

The lady just used everyone in her fight against Akheraj and now it doesn't matter to her what happens to Urmi and Kamili who supported her in her fight against Akheraj.

The fact is the lady never ever cared for anyone except her own interests.

Anandi doesn't need to bother about that family now that the child is out of the picture.

As a concerned social worker she offered to take the responsibility of Urmi.

It depends on Urmi herself and the concerned authorities whether they want to take that offer or not.

Why the same people who didn't want Anandi any where in Jhalra now are finding fault with the social worker when the great leader Mangala is already there?😛

Originally posted by: Missesha

Nobody is questioning child Anandi's beliefs / baheviours, or even young adult Anandi. Because in both these phases of her life she was a helpless little girl and a barely educated village belle. She is excused.

The one who is not excused is Mrs. SRS who was empowered and well supported, to make lives of her loved ones nice and simple but then why she unintentionally ended up creating havoc, when she was in a great position to control a lot? Can the fact that she was emotional about everyone justify the unintended destruction she brought?

How hard was it to tell Jagya before hand that ' my family is thinking of brining Saanchi's proposal for you, but this is not the bride I have chosen for you?'

It only requires some honesty and thoughtfulness for the man she considers a friend and whom she bullied into marrying in the first place.

And not only that, there were endless other opportunities to correct it. But she just won't until everything is destructed by four folds.

Similar story in DB's case, Saanchi'c case, living in BH forever or even giving Nandini back her identity etc

---------

Being practical and looking for win-win solutions or nipping the problem in the bud has never been Anandi.

Why Anandi only, most TV leads are only emotional fools, whose decisions operate under kasam, not questioning elders' decision even if it is wrong, who fear to hurt others and in -turn bring a bigger destruction etc.

But what surprises me even more is why do viewers support / defend such lame execution of story and lead female's behaviour, when they themselves know that there could have been better ways of showcasing the same track?

Pardon me, as I do not intend to break forum rules or offend anyone, but would viewers have behaved the same way as Anandi does if they were in her shoes? (I mean in Mrs. SRS shoes)

If no, then why so much of defense for Anandi's actions (which in turn is justifying what makers are showcasing through Anandi)

If yes, then I will try hard not to question Anandi's actions further.

Apologies,as I do not intend to offend anyone by questioning someone's personal opinion but I am simply curious.

Originally posted by: fast trak

Kundan was anyway going to be released depending on his behaviour. One indication from Mangala Devi that he had tried to strangulate her would've landed him in custody for a few good months.

But no! It is everyone else's fault for not preparing in advance for his comeback with the aarti ka thali. Everyone else except the great Mangala are at fault.

The cat drinks milk with eyes closed thinking no one else is watching 😆