If either ways 'Anandi is right' is the motive of the discussion, then it can't be helped.
If Anandi releases a criminal and that criminal targets someone, the victim becomes the wrong doer.
If Mangala releases a criminal and if that criminal targets someone, then the victim remains victim and Mangala becomes the offender?
How does this theory work??
DB had clear motives to destroy Shekhar family. Earlier her problem was with Anandi, because Anandi was getting so much importance despite being an abandoned woman, married for second time.
Later when Hardik left DB, DB intentionally wanted to harm Shekhars, so that Anandi also ends up losing her family. She intentionally created fights between the two brothers and kept taking advantage of Anoop's weakness.
Anoop is wrong in his part and Anandi is wrong in her part and DB was a criminal equal to Kundan (probably worse) because she was a disguised criminal, whom Anandi allowed to breed. However, had Anandi taken corrective actions on time, DB may not have any opportunity to take advantage of Anoop's weakness.
Kundan is atleast a known criminal and people know what to expect of him.
-------
At least no one is justifying Mangala here for releasing Kundan, but there is lot of defence happening to cover up Anandi's flaws. Wrong is wrong, just because the lead does it, it does not become right.
I will stick to my views that Anandi's inability to take corrective actions led to the downfall of KB (and I am not barring Anoop's mistakes)
Edited by Missesha - 9 years ago