How disgusting is Mangla - Page 10

Created

Last reply

Replies

101

Views

8.5k

Users

20

Likes

210

Frequent Posters

SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#91

Originally posted by: aparnauma

What kind of mother gives her child a knife to protect herself?In the end thankfully that knife was not of any use and the girl used her own brains and thinking to protect herself.
Anandi lost her child Mangala found her considers herself as that child's mother but the child looks at other girls and their mothers and longs for her own mother.
Had she not missed mother's love she wouldn't be asking if all mothers are like this.
So much for Mangala's love.


@bold -Mothers living in a harsh society have to do something like that. All are not fortunate like Anandi that they have support from many sources.

@blue - perhaps some people wanted that knife should not protect the girl. Had the knife not fell - what Nimboli suffered would not have happened. When someone is alone - he/she has to face the danger anyhow. But at least I am not thankful that the knife was not of any use. I wished she still had the knife with her.

Nimboli has questions about mother's love. From the childhood - she was made to call Mangala as teesa. I wish Mangala had at least as much time with her - as Anandi had (when she decided to take the girl to the venue) and somehow made Akhera convince to give the child to his bhabhi sa - as the child is devi's incarnation or something like that.
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#92
Mangala's story is like a surrogate mother's story.
There are so many examples in real world where the surrogate mother after giving birth to the child refused to give the child to the biological parents and some even ran away with the child.


It is not easy for anyone to give away the child you have raised like yours.

I dont understand how people expect mangala to give away nimboli to someone who comes after 12 yrs to claim for her daughter.

Mangala's reactions are natural and if anandi is mature she will understand her feelings for her daughter.
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#93

Originally posted by: Shinya

Mangala's story is like a surrogate mother's story.

There are so many examples in real world where the surrogate mother after giving birth to the child refused to give the child to the biological parents and some even ran away with the child.


It is not easy for anyone to give away the child you have raised like yours.

I dont understand how people expect mangala to give away nimboli to someone who comes after 12 yrs to claim for her daughter.

Mangala's reactions are natural and if anandi is mature she will understand her feelings for her daughter.


Mangala's reaction was natual - but I did not think it to stretch so far. And creatives carefully made the story with stark contrast. Why they could not make Mangala and Anandi equal in status? It would be a strong story to see the result had Mangala also had everything that Anandi has, that Nimboli was not a tortured balika vadhu, that nimboli had the childhood just like Anandi had - loving sasra and all the facilities. Would we still want the girl to leave everything and go to biological mother? In fact the story went bad from first leap itself. Why did they made J and Gauri bad? It would have been interesting to see how Bhairo/Sumitra/DS/Khajan/Bhago solve the issue where the child groom wants a wife of his choice because the child bride was not his choice. By bringing adultery angle and a negative Gauri, the story became predictable and flat.
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#94

Originally posted by: SPuja


Mangala's reaction was natual - but I did not think it to stretch so far. And creatives carefully made the story with stark contrast. Why they could not make Mangala and Anandi equal in status? It would be a strong story to see the result had Mangala also had everything that Anandi has, that Nimboli was not a tortured balika vadhu, that nimboli had the childhood just like Anandi had - loving sasra and all the facilities. Would we still want the girl to leave everything and go to biological mother? In fact the story went bad from first leap itself. Why did they made J and Gauri bad? It would have been interesting to see how Bhairo/Sumitra/DS/Khajan/Bhago solve the issue where the child groom wants a wife of his choice because the child bride was not his choice. By bringing adultery angle and a negative Gauri, the story became predictable and flat.


This I agree that to make the lead shine before others, they make other characters negative rather than making the lead strong and positive.

How will their lead's mistakes be covered up or look forgivable ? by bringing a negative character opposite her or making a positive character turn negative... that is their logic.

fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#95

Originally posted by: SPuja


Sarita was asking Anandi to drop at the venue. Taking a sick child to some far away venue with intention to stop a child marriage - knowing fully well that it can be dangerous and she herself was at gunpoint in one of her previous stopping of child marriage - if this is not cruel towards child?


So finally I begin to see your point.

We need to ignore all that Mangala is doing to the child. All that we need to do is sit and point out to Anandi's fault of taking the child to the venue 12 years ago. I agree that's why Nimboli is in all this trouble today. If that wouldn't have happened then today there would've been no story of kidnapper Mangala. 😆
fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#96

Originally posted by: Shinya


This I agree that to make the lead shine before others, they make other characters negative rather than making the lead strong and positive.

How will their lead's mistakes be covered up or look forgivable ? by bringing a negative character opposite her or making a positive character turn negative... that is their logic.


Nice to know that you think Mangala as negative 😆
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#97

Originally posted by: fast trak


So finally I begin to see your point.

We need to ignore all that Mangala is doing to the child. All that we need to do is sit and point out to Anandi's fault of taking the child to the venue 12 years ago. I agree that's why Nimboli is in all this trouble today. If that wouldn't have happened then today there would've been no story of kidnapper Mangala. 😆


Yes, there would be no story of Mangala had Anandi dropped her sick child home at that time. Who is interested to see all this? This is not Mangala's story. But when she has been introduced as saviour of Anandi's child, and has got attached with the child in these 12 years, why cannot we see both mother's point?

The fact is - had Mangala been as rich as Anandi - even courts would have given custody of the child to Mangala. It was deliberate attempt by story writer to make child suffer this much in her bal-vivah. If Nimboli's in-laws would be just like Anandi (only one tyrant and others good) - how could creatives justify Anandi's attachment with her sasara leaving her parents and Nimboli returning to her mother leaving sasra?
fast trak thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#98

Originally posted by: SPuja


Yes, there would be no story of Mangala had Anandi dropped her sick child home at that time. Who is interested to see all this? This is not Mangala's story. But when she has been introduced as saviour of Anandi's child, and has got attached with the child in these 12 years, why cannot we see both mother's point?

The fact is - had Mangala been as rich as Anandi - even courts would have given custody of the child to Mangala. It was deliberate attempt by story writer to make child suffer this much in her bal-vivah. If Nimboli's in-laws would be just like Anandi (only one tyrant and others good) - how could creatives justify Anandi's attachment with her sasara leaving her parents and Nimboli returning to her mother leaving sasra?



Is the person called mother anything to do with money? No. A father is but a mother isn't. A father is a provider and somewhere kids look up to their father for material expectations but never with a mother. It doesn't matter if Mangala was rich or poor or Anandi rich or poor. What is important is the kind of mother you are. She is filling Nimboli's mind with hatred about her real mother because she is plainly insecure about her own feelings.

She feels if the child realises that Anandi is the real mother she may run to her because she knows Anandi has set s very positive impression on the child's mind in just a few meetings. And if she comes to know that Anandi is the mother then Mangala's chances are gone forever hence she wants to make sure she poisons her mind completely against Anandi and takes charge of being Nimbolis mother.

Why do you think Mangala never insisted on Nimboli calling her mother all these years? Did she suddenly realise or remember maa ka rishta with her after 12 years!

If she's so confidence of her love then Nimboli will not leave her and go anywhere. But taking her promise and forcing her to call mother isn't the answer. In the current situation it's only rightful that the child be handed over to the real mother because right now Mangala is not being a good influence on her.
Edited by fast trak - 9 years ago
SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#99
The girl will not go to Anandi once she knows that she is the mother. Till she sees her as chokhi chudail - she will be happy with her. The girl will go to Anandi as soon as she sees her was not on Mangala's mind. She knew that vidhayak sa has called Anandi to take away the girl. That was the reason that she readily agreed to Kamli's suggestion.
Shinya thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: SPuja

The girl will not go to Anandi once she knows that she is the mother. Till she sees her as chokhi chudail - she will be happy with her. The girl will go to Anandi as soon as she sees her was not on Mangala's mind. She knew that vidhayak sa has called Anandi to take away the girl. That was the reason that she readily agreed to Kamli's suggestion.


I think she will go because anandi will lie to her that she was kidnaped by akhiraj for no fault of hers (anandi's)... she had gone to do such a noble work, but the criminal that he was just came, picked her up and walked away 🤢

After listening to this sob story of her mother, the girl will pity her mother. She might even think mangala was wrong to run away with her.

But yes, this is a deliberate attempt by CVs to make the girl feel sorry for her mother. If mangala had just remained where she was and told anandi firmly that she will not part with the girl, the girl would feel nothing for her mother and perhaps chosen mangala over anandi. 🤢
Edited by Shinya - 9 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".