Mangala should question Anandi

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Vidya

@Shinya

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#41

Yes, agree.. he was not ready to listen to devima.. in fact he said devima sab bakwas hei.

It was Harki who convinced him, not because of devi, but to remove the dosh of their son.

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#42

actually Ak listened 2 devimaa as per his convenience . wen it suited him or if hes scared 4 himself he listened oderwise he never cared 4 anything.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

afi88

@afi88

Beginner

Posted: 9 years ago

#43

At the end of all this what should matter is what is best for Nimboli

Her future..

What steps should be taken to make her future better/brighter then her past..

Stability, good education, protection, love, good moral sense etc.. are what Nimboli needs now

And providing this should be on the top of both mothers list

In everything save guard the child.. protect the child

One more thing in the real live example given the child was Lost In a Riot... In this case she was Kidnapped.. there is a fundamental difference between these two cases...

In court a lawyer would have whipped the floor with all of you... Mangala would've been a jailbird... Courts work with facts.. Not so much emotions. And also the child is always the priority.. Who can give the child what it needs.

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#44

Mangla did not kidnap the child - then how can she be sent to jail? And even in gujarat case - the child was found by a policeman - what a policeman should do? He cannot keep the child - he has to search for the parents etc. He gave the child to his cousin. The court did considered emotional values.

Nimboli's future is to be taken care of. But this immediate separation is not good even for Nimboli. The child will feel uprooted. There should be a transition period. She is not a lost article - she is a human being with emotions and attachments.

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#45

yes here child is kidnapped but did Mn kidnap the child??and court also thinks of emotions.court wud'd seen in wat circumstances Mn cudn't tell abt child mrg so how cud she b a jailbird or lawyer wud'd whipped floor wid all of us?? court wud'd rather condoned Mn's act 2 save an infant's life that watever she did was rite 2 save child.

and if its child's future is concerned then court also take care of child's wishes & emotions. in reality also court had given such verdicts abt such cases.and there both parties were equal in status or rather actual parent was bit better but they gave child 2 the foster parent.

and court wud'd asked Aji also why she took her sick child 2 such a dangerous place. any lawyer wud'd asked & no court wud'd said oh u did rite thing by taking an infant 2 such a dangerous spot just bcoz u wanted 2 save sum oder child.

Quote

afi88

@afi88

Beginner

Posted: 9 years ago

#46

She wasn't the principal offender (the one who committed the crime. She wasn't there when the crime was committed) true but she knew about the crime be it before or after the fact and concealed it and the offender... so in a court of law she is guilty for aiding and abetting. and she can go to jail for that.. like I just said the court doesn't work with emotions it works with facts... Now if she runs away with Nimboli , it can be argued that she is now the one kidnapping her.

I hope she comes to her senses.. Should she keep this up Nimboli will be torn away from her immediately then she will never see Nimboli again emotional attachment or transition period be damned.

There are many facts that could be used against Mangala should it become a court case.. or if this was real live.. Can see take care of this child emotionally/financially, How will she provide for Nimboli (where will they life, what about her schooling) Will she be able to protect her ( past events proof to differ) and she wasn't able to do so then what makes her capable to so now??

All these things can prevent the court to give her custody of Nimboli...

And the court would rather see a child raised by his or her bio-parents

They need good reasons to deviate from that principal

Edited by afi88 - 9 years ago

Quote

afi88

@afi88

Beginner

Posted: 9 years ago

#47

yes Anandi lost her child do to foolish behavior.. But a lawyer could argue that she paid the ultimate price for her stupidity.. And paid for it for 12 long years and she is still paying for it now (knowing the fate that befell her child) .. The court can decide to give her temporary custody and monitor her for a year or two..

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#48

and court wud'd listened that Aji had paid enough or get punished enough 4 it?no court wud'd seen that woman's carelessness & asked not 2 give the child 2 her even temporarily.

and Mn was not even considered as abetting in the crime.bcoz court wud'd taken circumstances in which she'd been living.that she din't've much say in the matters of that house. even they din't take Hk 2 jail who was also involved rather more actively. why?? bcoz court doesn't take wives in custody 4 husband's crime even if they know abt it. if ppl rembr the real cases where husbands'd gone 2 jail 4 their crimes but not wives or oder relatives even if they know ab t that e.g. r finding black money .

anoder lawyer cud'd easily said that Mn can't say anything 2 any1 as Ak was cruel & she was afraid 4 N & oder's safety and wen she found sum who cud take action she took action & told abt his crimes.

and court wudn'td seen that child shud b wid bio parents only. why shud it? they wud'd seen the criminal is in jail so now no harm is N living wid Mn and court wud'd asked her 2 educate the gal if N say she wants 2 live wid Mn.

Edited by tiny15 - 9 years ago

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#49

If this goes to court nobody will come out clean.

Akheraj Harki will be jailed for sure Kundan may be sent to home for juvenile delinquents and Mangala won't be able to escape punishment of hiding a crime like kidnapping as well as abetment to crime.

Doing child marriage is much lesser crime than concealing a kidnapper''s crime .

Child marriage - they may get off lightly because of the society they live in and their level of education.

Anandi may be reprimanded by court for putting a life in danger but there is enough evidence to suggest that she is a good mother capable of providing for her children and keeping them safe too.Shivam is an evidence for her capabilities as a mother.

Mangala has no legal rights even if she can claim on the basis of emotional attachment it is quite evident from the numerous instances that have happened in Akheraj house that there is no way she could keep the child safe and to top it all she has no means to provide for the child or give the life that child desrves.

Having some maternal instincts is NOT enough to raise a child. Child is a responsibility and not some object to satisfy some maternal instincts.