She wasn't the principal offender (the one who committed the crime. She wasn't there when the crime was committed) true but she knew about the crime be it before or after the fact and concealed it and the offender... so in a court of law she is guilty for aiding and abetting. and she can go to jail for that.. like I just said the court doesn't work with emotions it works with facts... Now if she runs away with Nimboli , it can be argued that she is now the one kidnapping her.
I hope she comes to her senses.. Should she keep this up Nimboli will be torn away from her immediately then she will never see Nimboli again emotional attachment or transition period be damned.
There are many facts that could be used against Mangala should it become a court case.. or if this was real live.. Can see take care of this child emotionally/financially, How will she provide for Nimboli (where will they life, what about her schooling) Will she be able to protect her ( past events proof to differ) and she wasn't able to do so then what makes her capable to so now??
All these things can prevent the court to give her custody of Nimboli...
And the court would rather see a child raised by his or her bio-parents
They need good reasons to deviate from that principal
Edited by afi88 - 10 years ago