Better track

This track of saving ratan's father is better and more touching than gehna's sister track.

We can relate to ratan singh and his parents more as it is. This will surely make them less bitter and vindictive. Even the blood transfusion did not look fake or dramatic. Well handled.

As for anandi going to Brijesh's house alone and also at that point of time is quite dangerous knowing that brijesh is a murderer(known to us only). But her finding the ladies' purse may give some insight into Brijesh which fact can be exploited by the defence. Plus Ram singh seems to be one loyal worker who is also ready to help shiv. There are no dearth of loyal workers like him but they usually wont lift a finger to help. They will be more interested to serve the new master.
The SP's behaviour is strange. First he was not ready to meet anandi and when he met her with lawyer, he behaved like a helpless fool.
Rasika seems to be misled by brijesh from the beginning. He seems to be her mentor with a firm grip on her and her life.

The main player seems to be Brijesh, not rasika. She must be his puppet.

Why so much focus on ladies' purse in Brijesh's home? He must have some female friends/relatives. On one hand creatives cannot show proper cross-examination of Rasika in court and on the other hand they are trying to show Anandi finding clues that Brijesh and Rasika are in a relationship - what does the relationship proves? If someone is accused and his family members think it is false accusation, then they get right to intrude privacy of the accuser or persons related personally/professionally with the accuser?

Originally posted by: SPuja

Why so much focus on ladies' purse in Brijesh's home? He must have some female friends/relatives. On one hand creatives cannot show proper cross-examination of Rasika in court and on the other hand they are trying to show Anandi finding clues that Brijesh and Rasika are in a relationship - what does the relationship proves? If someone is accused and his family members think it is false accusation, then they get right to intrude privacy of the accuser or persons related personally/professionally with the accuser?

That is the only way to find truth when unscrupulous people are involved. All is fair in such cases. No niceties or formalities are needed.
Brijesh was rude to an ex collector's wife when she came to his house at that point of time. He did not even invite her to come inside. He was rude and he erupted when she asked about the purse. All these things make him not only an uncouth person but also a suspect.

If it was a relative's or friend's purse, he would told her so without getting so hyoer.

When rasika talked about the efficiency of the defence lawyer, this brijesh got angry.

I wished she could have smelt ladies's perfume too.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

That is the only way to find truth when unscrupulous people are involved. All is fair in such cases. No niceties or formalities are needed.
Brijesh was rude to an ex collector's wife when she came to his house at that point of time. He did not even invite her to come inside. He was rude and he erupted when she asked about the purse. All these things make him not only an uncouth person but also a suspect.

anandi has many time ask brijesh abou rasika but she dont know rasika and brijesh frequently meet each other .once anandi come to know about that rasika and brijesh frequently meet each other at home and about their relationship two thing will be clear infront of anandi and vivek first thing is rasika is not happy with narendra and she is just shedding crocodile tears for her husband she is not at all sad at narendra death and second thing will come in anandi mind is that brijesh must be helping rasika

Originally posted by: SPuja

Does ex-collector's wife has a right to invade the privacy of any person, that too when she already grilled him before? @bold - is it possible in real life? Howsoever unscrupulous Rasika may be, grilling her in courtroom may have resulted in desired result - real court cases are like that - wife/relatives/lawyers do not go to accuser/persons related to accuser to collect evidence. Investigation should be shown by police or by detective agency.

Why not? Seems you are more concerned about niceties and formalities and rights of criminals.
I am more concerned about justice being done even if the means that are employed are not so nice.

yes leaves v r more interested in eating mangoes rather than counting trees

Just read the update.