Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 05 Sep 2025 EDT
GEETU vs MAIRA 5.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 06 Sep 2025 EDT
Maira Armaan Poddar
Alia is new global brand ambassador of Levis
Priyanka actually deserved more from BW. Robbed twice!
Happy Ending Kumkum Bhagya
A clean-shaven Ranveer spotted at the airport
23 years of Dil Hai Tumhaara
The most successful jodi in history of BW!
SRKs looks for King
Abhishek is annoying
Saiyaara: a movie which will forever remind me of love
Look Out Circular For Shilpa Shetty Raj Kundra
💕💜Somewhere Over the Rainbow #43 With Prats in our hearts 💜💕
CALL FROM CELL 6.6
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 6th Sep 2025 - WKV
Baaghi 4 crashes on Saturday
That is what I am saying for this track in my various posts - cross-examination is the logical tool here and not this snooping around.
Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
It is from anandi's viewpoint. She knows rasika and she knows about the false allegation. If her former employer praised rasika so effusively, anandi smelling a rat is not unusual.
Anandi knows Rasika was trying to get close to Shiv, Shiv ended up doing office work also, she came to Shiv with her sob story and then false molestation charges. Does that means that she was like this with every one? Does that means that anyone praising her is suspicious? Even Narendra's parents are with her - why no suspicion on them? Howsoever bad a person may be - he/she must have friends - so if anyone praises the culprit means he/she is an accomplice and should be stalked?
Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
Because rasika herself said ask my previous employers.
Employers is wrong word - the employer is Government of Rajasthan - she should have said previous officers, and Anandi should have asked everyone (service book gives information of all previous postings). But Anandi is wrong in thinking that anybody praising Rasika automatically becomes a culprit/accomplice.
Originally posted by: The_Alchemist.
Oops you say that is limit-less nitpicking. I'd say what they are showing is farce and bullshit.I felt the questions that you asked with so many question marks in the first post were totally unrelated and diverting the topic quite a bit. So had to quote. I love the relentless support you give to CV's when it comes to anandi though.
Originally posted by: surabhi01
i think vivek could have ask question to policd if u already know that there is problem in equipment and footage is deleted that why dont u inform us earlier
all crimes is cover in this rasika track such asmolestationmurderstealing of real cctvhiding proof420 means fraudmay be briberyadultery