Show proper ending to court case

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

santhisaj

@santhisaj

Beginner

Posted: 11 years ago

#21

When BV showed us that all others did bad did get punishment - even Jagya - why not Shekars? Sanchi who berated Anandi and her father , Ira who is really an abusive MIL , Shiv who is the most double standard hypocrite , the stupid Alok and the most idiot of the grandfather with no common sense - all go scot free with a "sorry"????

A character like Ira - she does not show any respect to any one in society . Even if your enemy comes to your house you show hospitality. Bhairav was insulted by her daugher and she added to it. Not allowing Dadisa to drink water? What are they proving here??? This type of high handness is OK and it is our Culture to be proud of? What social justice is here? That rich powerful people can insult anyone - the way they talked down on Ganga - and go free with sorry?

BV proved - any woman who is a Wife and a DIL is a spineless idiot. Husband and family can do anything - but it is all ok.That is what BV was fighting against - right? Now Anandi - the protogonist is wearing the same dress. How is she different from any " downtroden women" she is fighting for through her charitable organization?

What about the judge? He does not ask why withdrawing the case? The reason - my daughter/sister is a lier? No newspater reports of the issue?

How much state resources wasted for a stupid sister of a double faced dist collecter? When your family is involved and you make sure the other party (Jagya) get punished at any cost - is called Corruption.

A senior officer should be able to act outside the influence of personal prejudice. Remember the issue with Nandu and other child about the toy and Gehna and her husband trying to influence Anandi as a Sarpanch. BV showed a sensible Sarpanch in Anandi, taking the right decision and giving proper justice. What about now? .

What about the suicide attempt case against Sanchi?

The so called "sophisticated abuse" exemplified by Shekhars are not condemned in BV, but swept under the carpet - or sometimes glorified.

Even if I did not know Hindi , I used to watch this online with the English Subtitles. I am fed up. They really have destroyed the value of the show.

Edited by santhisaj - 11 years ago

Quote

dixie123

@dixie123

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
I agree about the defence and prosecuting lawyers called to the chambers by the judge and asked if they mutually agree but why should they show defence agreeing now ...why not show Dadisa NOT agreeing now . How much they pleaded , what point is all this if everything is the whim of a brat , even courts .

The Singhs will agree for a deal, if at all they show it the way you ahve written above, obviously for Anandi's happiness in KB.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

-poloenigma-

@-poloenigma-

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#23

I think the CVs were clueless as how to go ahead with this track. They didn't want to take on more complications regarding the track, hence ending it in a jiffy with a lame conclusion. Maybe the track was recieving a lot of negative feedback . Hence, the sudden decision to pull the plug on this whole tamasha.

Quote

Picasso9

@Picasso9

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#24

It's quite an anti climax, isn't it? So much for gratifying audiences after stressing, irritating, and generally just messing with us for months. The least the cvs could do was show us proper justice. BV is supposed to be addressing social evils, but they are glorifying social evils and evil doers by letting them off scot free.

So much for consequences. Even the kekta shows give audiences some satisfaction at the end of a long and drawn out tug o war between the protagonist and antagonist.

Am I missing something? I thought Shekhars couldn't take back the case when Bhairon and others pleaded with them because it was out of their hands and in that of the state. So how come Saanchi can conveniently take back the case now? Do BV makers think we're stupid?

Why is the Collector not reprimanded for using state resources in a false case. Why is he not reprimanded for misconduct in entangling a personal vendetta with professional duty.

I want to see Shekhars grovelling. I want to see Shiv grovelling (if he can act).

So disappointed.

Edited by Picasso9 - 11 years ago

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#25

All i know is

its a lame lame ending .

They HAVE to show repercussions .

On so many levels .

The Singhs now willing to take Jagya Ganga back but Jagya himself not wanting it now ...and it is not for ego but for vile character assasination of Ganga by Sumitra . He should refuse to take Mannu back to such an atmosphere .

All the brutal treatment that Anandi got ...its gonna end just like that ?

And Ira , her henchman Shiv who conveniently flicked off the objective responsibilities of a Collector and decided to play Big Brother for a while and in the process hurt innocent souls and that sickening brat Saanchi r gonna go scot free with just apologies ?😲 Just apologies were not enough for them !

Quote

KiranlovSriti

@KiranlovSriti

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#26

But where is Rajasthan Goverment? What a blooper. They said Rajasthan Goverment filed the case then how Sanchi withdarw it.? She should be punishd from Rajasthan Goverment too.

Quote

dixie123

@dixie123

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#27

I agree there should be a proper closure to the court drama. I agree on everything except on Shiv. I don't believe that Shiv has done anything to break the law, use his power and manipulate the system. I hope to see him being guilty of the way he behaved with the singhs and Anandi. His maafi will be short although I don't mind if Anandi gave him a ST for sometime like she did during th transfer drama.

But in all this, will Jagya be accused of wrong doing too ? He didn't tell the entire truth to the court about the coffee incident. He hid the fact that Anandi was with him but anandi tells the truth bringing out Payal's name. They may fine him for misleading the court.

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#28

I don't say Shiv has to lose his job dixie but he has to be asked uncomfortable questiuons in court that make him THINK ? And have solid repercussions on personal level ? His mother DESTROYED his marital life for the daughter , she did NOT look out for HIS interests and he foolishly went along ! He was not innocent dixie nor was he blameless . He had a big hand in this too .

Quote

saba113

@saba113

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

#29

Shiv should only be guilty of his behavior with Anandi and Singhs and what about Jagya ? Was Jagya his charity case the taunts and insults he has thrown on him ?That meri behen ka haath chod was such cheap act of him when he could see his Bachi tried to slap Ganga Won't he be ashamed of it ?

Edited by saba113 - 11 years ago

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#30

Originally posted by: KiranlovSriti
But where is Rajasthan Goverment? What a blooper. They said Rajasthan Goverment filed the case then how Sanchi withdarw it.? She should be punishd from Rajasthan Goverment too.

This is exactly my question , they had told even if we wish we cannot take case back now , it is out of even the Shekhars hands