Tactless Anandi!

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

morel

@morel

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: sidra08
and since you are a Gauri fan so for you when Jagya will be right and why you will understand the POV of others who are supporting him here 😆 Real truth only you guys speak rest are liars

Oh my my... How do you know that I am a Gauri FAN 😕??? Which post/s of mine make you think so !!! Anyways I am not surprised atall by your Quote 😉 First of all... "I DONT LIKE JAGIYA" does not make me a GAURI fan automatically 🤣 And secondly I DONT CARE what you think about me. Go On...

Quote

morel

@morel

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

#32

Originally posted by: Shinya

@bold - this is not correct... when bhairo had asked her to file a bigamy case against jagya, she had said dadisa has high respect in the village, how dadisa would feel if she takes jagya to court blah blah...

because the dead person will not get his life back does not mean the murderer should not be taken to court or punished.

Anandi is completely wrong this time and I am happy that shiv did not come under her thumb this time.

👏👍🏼

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#33

Annadi did not prosecute Jagya because she felt it was futile.

Sanchi's case is weak.Sanchi and Shekhars are more at fault than Jagya and Singhs.

Sanchi has more to lose than gain if she decides to pursue the matter.

Anandi was right in telling these points.

Shiv is by no means right.On his own admission he is not using his brains.

Anandi instead of trying to give some clarity to his thoughts only ended up messing up his brain further.Instead of concentrating on advising him to move on she was going on about the hurt and humiliations which Singhs will face.

The need of the hour was to convince Shiv like CM tried to do.

If they move on from all this they themselves will realise without any gyan from Anandi that Sanchi is more at fault in this entire issue.

What is the point in giving gyan when that is not the need of the hour?

Need of the hour is emotional support and comfort to the family.

They foolishly landed themselves in a ditch and they are all in pain and at that point help should be given to them not gyan.

Quote

redapple1

@redapple1

Voyager

Posted: 12 years ago

#34

Aparna did the writers of the show change? Why Sanchi has become the lead? Where did surpunch Anandi go? In a married life a husband cannot always support his wife nor a wife can always support her husband. When Shiv is saying he wants to be there for his family at this difficult time then he should be ok with Anandi wanting to be with her family at this hour too. It is ok if he foesnt want to support Anandi. Wish they show more confident Anandi than confused one.

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: redapple1
Aparna did the writers of the show change? Why Sanchi has become the lead? Where did surpunch Anandi go? In a married life a husband cannot always support his wife nor a wife can always support her husband. When Shiv is saying he wants to be there for his family at this difficult time then he should be ok with Anandi wanting to be with her family at this hour too. It is ok if he foesnt want to support Anandi. Wish they show more confident Anandi than confused one.

Subha Don't know whether writers have changed but thing is they are using Sanchi to create drama between Anandi and Shiv as well as Jagya and Shiv.

To tell the story they need drama.

Anandi doing her social work with occasional interruptions by Sasuma doesn't give much scope for drama because Ira is not a strong character like Dsa and she is not truly bad.

Same way Jagya getting along in life smoothly and finding love and happiness in Ganga and Ganga facing problems with Sumi doesn't create much drama because Sumi is more of disturbed woman rather than a truly evil person.

All the characters are sensible characters by and nature and the only way to make them behave in a senseless manner is by making them react to someone like Sanchi who is senseless and vicious at the same time.

Thing is this becoming unbearable because of more drama and less of story.

If stories of Anandi and Jagya continue along with the drama it would have been more tolerable

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: sidra08
Lol please go ahead and write a note for Balika Vadhu creative team start a revolution against them to hang Jagya to death How the hell he played with the lives of his balika vadhu Anandi , innocent not at all wrong Gauri and the not so wrong Sanchi Bechari bachi You are just commenting in your feminism too much The one which blames a man for everything and support a woman That category naa which believes if a man slaps a woman he is wrong if a woman slaps a man he is wrong otherwise today you won't be saying Sanchi not so wrong Please don't report me I am not badmouthing or bashing you

Of course bad mouthing your family is not wrong Will you marry such a person who have such cheap views about your parents ? At least I won't and where he blamed her he simply called off the wedding by saying he cannot fulfill her criteria what she wants from him Please let me know which law and which religion in the world call it crime and a sin and will term him he played with Sanchi's life If you can prove it I will call jagya as wrong and do you even know facts of the so many divorces happening in India Mostly are happening because of it where daughter in law's bad mouths their sasurals , create disturbances in the families , separate families Law holds it valid reason for divorce and why again and again bringing Sanchi is so bad character ?😕only bad women behave like this Good women never behave like this Have you seen any good woman behave like this So according to your theory the one who badmouths their sasurals bribes pandits are good women If Sanchi would not be bad this all would not be happening in the first place so what is your point of too bad Sanchi is so bad and people think Jagya is right Failed to understand your point ????

Marrying another after breaking the engagement which law and religion calls it wrong prove no one neither it is morally wrong It can only be wrong in the terminology of blind feminism or blind hatred You have which criteria you better know and please don't report me as I did not do any crime here At least I did not badmouth you the way Sanchi did of Jagya's family

@bold and especially red part, it is direct personal attack, however, I am too old to take these things seriously, so I will not report the post.

As regards my views, I am quoting what I said in another thread, anyone can agree or disagree, we are here to share our views.

"When I said he is not guilty in the present case - it was about the section under which the case is being filed - he is not guilty of abatement of suicide attempt.

What he did was morally wrong and I have already expressed my views about it in my various posts. I agree he was guilty of cheating Sanchi and her family. When someone agrees to marry - it is like agreeing to accept the rishta. He did not accept the rishta with Sanchi - he just accepted to get married for his family's (may be Anandi's) happiness but did he think about his would-be wife's happiness ever? Like your assessment that he had no feelings for Sanchi. He may be sacrificing his own happiness for his family's sake but why did not he thought that he is sacrificing even his would be wife's happiness - he had no right to sacrifice another person's happiness for the sake of his family. Greater wrong was done by him when even after realising(?) his love for Ganga he continued with this rishta - what he was thinking? He can marry someone for the sake of his family with no intention of loving/caring for her? So what Jagya did was not right - it is just that he is not guilty of abatement of suicide. He was morally wrong - but what he did was not against any law of the country - so he cannot be taken to court.

Similarly what Sanchi did (pretending to change, bribing the pandit, badmouthing the future in-laws and mocking their ways) was wrong morally - but even she did not do anything against the law of the land -except for the attempt to suicide. She must be tried in court of law for this offence, but what people are saying that her "truth" will come out in court etc. is nothing. Court does not consider gossiping as crime - a lot of daughters-in-law do the same thing even though in front of their in-laws they pretend to be caring and respecting them. It is just that Sanchi's character was bad right from the start (when she entered the show) with no justification ever shown why she is like this - so nobody can have any sympathy towards her."

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: maria13
👏 well said sidra

Thanks for supporting personal attack on a member of forum.

Quote

Dr.Fear

@Dr.Fear

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

#38

Originally posted by: Skepblun
Shiv was earlier moved and in two minds when CM had spoken. But I believe Anandi's convo to him spoiled it. She put brakes on his introspection by mentioning haveli wallahs and Jagya.

BTW, isn't it hypocritical? She drags others to court and barks about laws whereas talks against "kanooni jhanjhat" and issues of family respect etc. when cases concern her family (read Jagya)?

I was thinking Shiv would manage Sanchi's case using his influence. But I am relieved he did not do so yet.

I wasn't convinced by Anandi's words myself. What to talk of debating Shiv's behaviour?

True said , she preaches law even when others are worried about family respect and hmm...me

also not convinced by Anandi's words 🤔

Quote

anshurg5

@anshurg5

Sparkler

Posted: 12 years ago

#39

Agree, Anandi was tactless during her convo with Shiv Y/day.

Shiv was listening CM's points against taking revenge from J and Singhs with open mind and was uncomfortable after listening her reasoning. Anandi can further make him see her point if she was focused more on Sanchi's trauma during court case instead of showing more concern for Singhs ang J. At the moment Shiv is overwhelmed by his sister and family's pain, he could not feel for the pain and distress of Singhs. Anandi could have presented herself as more concerned for Sa' pain then could have convinced S for the futility of the court case. She could have tell that dragging the issue will not let Sanchi move away from J.

She was talking about the possibility of mending of the relations btw two families which was not on cards for Shiv right now.It will only make him believe that A is unable to feel the pain of his family and is more distressed about Singhs and J.

Quote

642126

Hibernated

Posted: 12 years ago

#40

Where is this discussion meandering?

Anyway, it is not about defending Jagya or not, it was about Anandi's tact in talking to Shiv. She has failed to convey to him that she is concerned about him and his family too.

BTW, if Sanchi badmouthing Jagya is bad then what about Jagya doing totka at Anandi's mother's funeral? Wonder if such a man deserves sympathies?(Compelled by Gauri is no excuse. She had asked him to do many other things like getting a job or completing studies which he did not do! He could have thrown her totka thing in garbage bin somewhere in suburbs and lied to her that he had done it!)

It seems odd when high moral ground is taken in case of characters like Jagya or DS.

Before somebody jumps at me, let me clarify I found it equally laughable when Shiv told Anandi yesterday that he stood for truth every time!😆 When he was letting Jagya off in cases of hitting an IAS officer and changing figures from confidential government papers - what sachai ka saath deed was he doing?

Had he been upright and strict about wrong doing - whether it was from Jagya or his own sister - from the beginning itself, then such a scenario would never have occured. Like a male version of Anandi he was excusing people! What is the use of getting frustrated or hurt now?

Quote

1 2 3 4 5

Tactless Anandi! - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics