Was Sid at the Accident site? Mystery solved! - Page 2

Originally posted by: rohini55

well got confused by dal mein kuch kaala comment. Thought it was about him being in the car and lying it. Why should anyone want to hide the fact that S was at P's party? So many people from BV were there. Shashank was hugging her, So what is special or not special about another cast member being there? In any case, from the video that has been posted, the only story that emerges is that she is terribly lovey-dovey with a guy who seems like her bf.So what possible interpretation can be made from S being there? He was not even shown with her, So how does his mere presence prove or disprove anything? and why does no one ever mention her bf? Is it a taboo subject? Sorry, too complex to understand

exactly dear its too complex :-D
tht guy makrand is P's on off bf...they keep breaking n patching up every few months...so its really not clear abt his current status.
Sid n P r def good frns so are rest of the bv cast.
No idea abt the inside story ;-)

Its complicated! 😉

Chalo atleast I am happy Mr Shukla still considers someone as a close friend...dats why being in the party till the end, leaving the venue with the "hosts and gang" and leading in the crisis from the forefront 😳

Btw to all the people who think he might have dropped in from home...why didnt shanky and Smita came running from their home?😆 As they too r really close to Prats.

Originally posted by: rohini55

well got confused by dal mein kuch kaala comment. Thought it was about him being in the car and lying it. Why should anyone want to hide the fact that S was at P's party? So many people from BV were there. Shashank was hugging her, So what is special or not special about another cast member being there? In any case, from the video that has been posted, the only story that emerges is that she is terribly lovey-dovey with a guy who seems like her bf.So what possible interpretation can be made from S being there? He was not even shown with her, So how does his mere presence prove or disprove anything? and why does no one ever mention her bf? Is it a taboo subject? Sorry, too complex to understand

Oh Ok! this is that war and I unwittingly came into the crossfire. I thought s was unfairly being dragged into the accident!! Going back to my golden silence:😆

wottever,,if it's really SS there with pratzzz --- loved it.

Can't resist this. Got it: So one side thinks S and P are an item and sees the former's presence in party as proof. The other side disputes the pairing so he is not present in party. But video shows he is present. But problem is there is one larger than life real bf-looking bloke with whom she is sticking like fevicol. Then the accident reveals HE was there and merrymaking till early morning. So much like a film plot. Rohit Shetty should make this comic caper into his next film.Main, tum aur woh 😉

Originally posted by: rohini55

Can't resist this. Got it: So one side thinks S and P are an item and sees the former's presence in party as proof. The other side disputes the pairing so he is not present in party. But video shows he is present. But problem is there is one larger than life real bf-looking bloke with whom she is sticking like fevicol. Then the accident reveals HE was there and merrymaking till early morning. So much like a film plot. Rohit Shetty should make this comic caper into his next film.Main, tum aur woh 😉

Originally posted by: rohini55

Can't resist this. Got it: So one side thinks S and P are an item and sees the former's presence in party as proof. The other side disputes the pairing so he is not present in party. But video shows he is present. But problem is there is one larger than life real bf-looking bloke with whom she is sticking like fevicol. Then the accident reveals HE was there and merrymaking till early morning. So much like a film plot. Rohit Shetty should make this comic caper into his next film.Main, tum aur woh 😉

Originally posted by: rohini55

well got confused by dal mein kuch kaala comment. Thought it was about him being in the car and lying it. Why should anyone want to hide the fact that S was at P's party? So many people from BV were there. Shashank was hugging her, So what is special or not special about another cast member being there? In any case, from the video that has been posted, the only story that emerges is that she is terribly lovey-dovey with a guy who seems like her bf.So what possible interpretation can be made from S being there? He was not even shown with her, So how does his mere presence prove or disprove anything? and why does no one ever mention her bf? Is it a taboo subject? Sorry, too complex to understand

You my dear have all the quality of good detective 👏👏👏(this is also refering to your previous post in this thread), asking all the right questions😆

So, indeed what is so special about big dilemma was Sid there or not. It looks like people can not swallow the fact that Sid & Prats are good friends, that all their off screen chemistry and camaraderie was not staged by director ( LOL-some people not only believe that but they also write about that😆) but was really true, and hence as a good friends they celebrate each others birthdays.

bold - completely agree with you 😛
bold- Sometimes someones absence talk more than someone else presence 😉😳

bold- beats me, have no idea...I think for that we need more detectives
to work on solving that mistery😆

bold - completely agree with you 😆😆😆