poor guy new patient - Page 11

Originally posted by: intruderfast

😆😆😆iss argument kaa koi ant nahin😛

Anmol this is not argument, this is fact. Only some people with self defined dream legal acts make is argument. Argument can be Gouri rit or wrong. Argument can be Anandi is dumb or Gauri is Intelligent. Argument can be Jogia sd call Anandi or not or Gauri sd suspect him or not or even Anandi sd punish jogia or not. But how can a well defined law can be argument. Yes if someone can't understand it and misinterpret it thn they can argue. Some people can even argue abt our fundamental rit of equality or second marriage is allowed or not .we can't stop but its not argument but its jabardasti ka argument 😆 😆

Originally posted by: ankit111

Anmol this is not argument, this is fact. Only some people with self defined dream legal acts make is argument. Argument can be Gouri rit or wrong. Argument can be Anandi is dumb or Gauri is Intelligent. Argument can be Jogia sd call Anandi or not or Gauri sd suspect him or not or even Anandi sd punish jogia or not. But how can a well defined law can be argument. Yes if someone can't understand it and misinterpret it thn they can argue. Some people can even argue abt our fundamental rit of equality or second marriage is allowed or not .we can't stop but its not argument but its jabardasti ka argument 😆 😆

ankit well said!! this is not abt POV or even wats rt as a human being. i rem one thing which once my younger bro said that rules can b changed like widow remarriage or maariage wid devar after husband's death but not ethics & morals like not murdering sum1 or not marrying 2 an already married prsn widout having proper & leagl separation!!

Originally posted by: Suchi-NivReniac

Thanks Antara !!! and Lakshmi!!

I am glad that India still holds marriages as sacred.

There is no way a person can make something correct just to fulfill his whims and desires.

====

Personally I have no problem with Jag and Gauri relationship in and of itself. Just the way it was done.

Because not until recently ( mid 1900's) the law of monogamy was established. Before that many men had many wives and it was a common thing back then.

So what jagya is doing is not something that was totally un-natural.

But there is a thin line here:

1. Jagya wanted to get married to Gauri and not have her as a second in hand thing.

2. Jagya and Gauri married ( to what ever knowledge) they had and then had the physical relationship in other words no adultery going on in THEIR eyes.

Now here is where usually people split:

is second marriage ok?

for those it is , what jagya did is normal

and for those who think its not?

then its adultery

===

So in reality its not what Jagya DID is bothering many of us, its just the way he did it.

So again :

If he had respectfully ended his first relationship and then started another one. No one would have issue rather many would support him.

And if he be from those who think second marriages are allowed then what he is doing is not wrong.

I think if there is nothing to like but there is nothing to oppose also regarding Anandi . there is nothing wrong in her nature or character except when strong steps should have been taken on J she didinot take, only that much nothing else not to support her ( i believe). I think we decide whether to support one or not depending on the persons nature and character and anandi's character or acts are quite natural and good. only thing one can critisise on the topic related to jagya otherwise nothing is there to critisise. There are some person who keep silent even when the husband cheats on there wife or even beats them but here anandi refused to take any step i mean harsh step because according to her he has got punishment for his deeds by the family. She kept quite in those five or four years after coming from mumbai when she argued with J in the birthday party just because she thought the long distance was the reason and it can be mended by showering love and not by asking question . She has shown much more strong character by forgiving G and J and not going to depression mode. I find her character quite matured because maturity doesnot mean just to react all the time and speak out what brings no solution only creates tension. If anandi has shouted or make a scene in the Haveli or Jetsar what profit is there.

Originally posted by: muktha_cute

In August 2010, the Supreme Court held that a live-in relationship that has existed for a long time will be considered a marriage
and that the children born to such a couple will not be illegitimate.

its not only about kid
they mentioned it clearly that a live-in-relationship which exist 4 long time is considered as marriage
then the next pointcomes about legality of child
when they are stating it clear that LIR of long time is considered as marriage then obviously the kid is legitamate

Originally posted by: gagarulez

Legal, Illegal...Illegitimate, Legitimate...etc etc etc gyaan, articles, links...whatever it is...will NOT change one thing...which we tend to forget...

People who support Jagya and Gauri WILL support them (like I do ) and

People who support Anandi will do that...

So why waste time in counter attacks and research 🤣🤣

and like I said earlier...NO ONE has the right to say the other party's "pov" is wrong

How i wish people cd read and understand, instead of just copy and paste the article 😉

Originally posted by: ankit111

How i wish people cd read and understand, instead of just copy and paste the article 😉

yaeh ankit sum ppl just copy & paste the articles or news but don't try 2 see in the deep until its their fav. ckt in whom's heart they'd dived deeeppp down!!😉

People are conveniently forgetting that Jagya is MARRIED to ANANDI.

and 4 giving Radha-Krishna eg. that judge was not just criticised but alos made fun. atleast Radha-Krishna never'd LIR!! wat a stupid statement by a judge!!lagta hai uss judge ka deemag ka koi pech dhila ho gaya hai!!