From the start, I had never expected this show to do what usually would be the reality. That a girl in such a situation, a star with a controlling father and family, usually ends up walking out and making the choice she wants. I was understanding that they had to be careful when it came to showing a daughter and how she deals with such a father, and how she goes against her father.
Until 11th May episode, Raghvendra's control freak actions affected mostly just Yamini and the family. If the family wanted to continue on willingly shackled to their belief that they need to heed Raghvendra, that's their choice. Let them do so.
But then, the story took a turn for the worse, when it spilled over to someone who had nothing to do with any of this. He was affected and assaulted for no fault of his own. And the characters seemed not to care. Worse, the narrative seems not to care--unless they are trying to tell us the waiter was indeed at fault, which was NOT how it was shown in the Friday episode, and if that's the stance taken in the narrative, then it is disgusting.
Maybe most of the target audience doesn't care. After all, why should they? Since if the show and the characters are anything to go by, the feudalistic thoughts is reality because society as a whole doesn't care and probably behave in the same feudalistic manner themselves.
Or is it that within a span of an episode, the writers realized they went too far, and tried to scale it back? Or they were forced to scale it back by higher powers, because acknowledging the gravity of Raghvendra's actions meant that Yamini would have to be shown as someone who now lost some respect for her father and did not think of him as highly as she once did. But no, they couldn't have that. They needed to try to have it both ways by using Raghvendra as a villain while employing the same limitations in Hindi serialdom when it comes to asshole, jackass male leads and the vamp mother-in-laws.
Nikumbh is not a jackass male lead. But Yamini is stuck in a similar situation as we see many Hindi heroines--taking crap because either it is her husband, or because it is her family/sasural. The female is never truly allowed to take a real stand. But instead is restricted due to the ties that bind her to those who are causing her problems, disrespecting her, controlling her, humiliating her, etc etc.
Raghvendra in essence does disrespect Yamini in the very way he controls Yamini. But that will never be acknowledged, and Yamini will be forced to always respect him even though he deserves no respect, simply because she is a daughter--a female.
And if the writers' plan is to eventually acknowledge all that is problematic with Raghvendra, and to have Yamini stand up to him, then they made a grave mistake in their narrative choice last week. If this was too early in the story for Yamini to start standing up to her father, then they shouldn't have shown that waiter incident. And same goes if their plan is to never have Yamini stand up against her father, they should've never had the waiter incident. After that Raghvendra deserves no respect and Yamini SHOULD lose respect for him, and not still be defending him. And even if Yamini for some reason is still blinded, the narrative and other characters should not have brushed it over and made light of it. That is the crux of the problem, Yamini, other characters and the narrative ALL brushed past what happened with the waiter.
I wish I could've structured and written this post better. But at this point I really don't care. I just wanted to finish writing this damn post. I'm just glad to have gotten this over with.
Edited by KhatamKahani - 11 years ago