Shruti's behaviour - Page 2

Like in old Hindi movies.

It was Anupama against the Shahs. In Anupama's case, bapuji wanted Anupama to marry in Shah house. In this case, Shruti is not compelled to do anything as such. Plus, here Shruti should know that Anupama and Anuj love each other. She must respect and feel for Anupama and Anuj. She can let anyone else in the town to carter her wedding. Anupama has done her nothing wrong. Shruti shouldn't subject Anupama under this humiliation and pain.

Originally posted by: Jefen

It was Anupama against the Shahs. In Anupama's case, bapuji wanted Anupama to marry in Shah house. In this case, Shruti is not compelled to do anything as such. Plus, here Shruti should know that Anupama and Anuj love each other. She must respect and feel for Anupama and Anuj. She can let anyone else in the town to carter her wedding. Anupama has done her nothing wrong. Shruti shouldn't subject Anupama under this humiliation and pain.

I agree, Shruti calling her to cater is uncalled for.

But wasn't it Anupama and Anuj Both who actually hid the truth from her knowing everything about her until she found out the truth by chance?

Well, Shruti is being unreasonable but both Anupama and Anuj are not clean either.

Should have, could have hamein jaana hi nahin hain. Anupama is one character that will be found short however you look at it.

She should Not have stayed back at Shah House after her divorce.

She should Not have interferred between Vanraj and Kavya during the initial days under the garb of "guiding" Kavya. She should have understood that it is Kavya's relation with Shahs that she has to build.

She shouldn't have taken decisions on behalf of Kavya to allow Malavika to stay at Shah House especially knowing that Vanraj is lusting on Malavika. She should have understood that she has NO Haq on Shah House, not as Bahu, Not as Beti.

She should have declined Hansmukh's request, respectfully. She should have understood Leela predicament and resentment.

She should have stood up for her mother Kanta when she was being insulted at Shah House that too during her wedding events.

How a parent meet once in week to children after divorce

Suppose affer divorce father has custody of child and mother is allow to meet child only once In week so how mother will meet their children

Real life mein mother ya father Jo bhi hai Apne bachon se kaise milti hogi

Kya woh bachon se mine ke liye ex husband ya ex wife ke Ghar nahi jaate honge ya phir bus Bahar sadak park ya restaurant pe milne honge kya yeh har hafte possible hai kya teen Ghanta kisi restaurant mein ya park mein Baitha possible hai atleast father or mother want to spend whole day not just 30 minute with her or his children when she pr he is allow to meet children once a week so it is not practical possible every time to meet children in park or restaurant so they go to ex house

Aise bhi kya hai just because husband and wife divorce to maa ya father apne bachon se milne Ghar ke andar nahi aa sakti kyonki woh uske ex ka Ghar hai bus Bahar sadak pe hi bachon se mil lo ki nahi Ab divorce ho gaye ab aap andar nahi aa sakte kya bache few hrs ke liye maa ko apne Ghar nahi Bula sakte

Originally posted by: surabhi01

How a parent meet once in week to children after divorce

Suppose affer divorce father has custody of child and mother is allow to meet child only once In week so how mother will meet their children

Real life mein mother ya father Jo bhi hai Apne bachon se kaise milti hogi

Kya woh bachon se mine ke liye ex husband ya ex wife ke Ghar nahi jaate honge ya phir bus Bahar sadak park ya restaurant pe milne honge kya yeh har hafte possible hai kya teen Ghanta kisi restaurant mein ya park mein Baitha possible hai atleast father or mother want to spend whole day not just 30 minute with her or his children when she pr he is allow to meet children once a week so it is not practical possible every time to meet children in park or restaurant so they go to ex house

Aise bhi kya hai just because husband and wife divorce to maa ya father apne bachon se milne Ghar ke andar nahi aa sakti kyonki woh uske ex ka Ghar hai bus Bahar sadak pe hi bachon se mil lo ki nahi Ab divorce ho gaye ab aap andar nahi aa sakte kya bache few hrs ke liye maa ko apne Ghar nahi Bula sakte

In real life if a parent has custody and second can meet for a day in week or month then the said child goes to the second parent home for a day. The said ex can come for pickup or drop. They don’t have to stay whole day at ex’s house. After divorce no one goes to exs house like Anupama and cook there even when ex husband had second wife. Shah’s own real daughter doesn’t come SH like Anupama. Maybe She knows that there have to a limit for everything.

In principle, yes

But in reality, Anupamaa exists only to be insulted and humiliated on a daily basis. She's the human version of a punching bag. Producers have validated this theory again and again as she keeps being taunted and insulted by all, her nayi udaans keep flopping and she still remains a failure on all accounts

Why should shameless shahs always have the fun despite her repeatedly running back to them? Maybe, on a few occasions they can rest and recharge, while someone else does the honours of insulting her. Considering her own actions are not endearing in the slightest and the sheer hypocrisy she exhibits, it's delightful to watch her beizzati everyday.

Originally posted by: surabhi01

How a parent meet once in week to children after divorce

Suppose affer divorce father has custody of child and mother is allow to meet child only once In week so how mother will meet their children

Real life mein mother ya father Jo bhi hai Apne bachon se kaise milti hogi

Kya woh bachon se mine ke liye ex husband ya ex wife ke Ghar nahi jaate honge ya phir bus Bahar sadak park ya restaurant pe milne honge kya yeh har hafte possible hai kya teen Ghanta kisi restaurant mein ya park mein Baitha possible hai atleast father or mother want to spend whole day not just 30 minute with her or his children when she pr he is allow to meet children once a week so it is not practical possible every time to meet children in park or restaurant so they go to ex house

Aise bhi kya hai just because husband and wife divorce to maa ya father apne bachon se milne Ghar ke andar nahi aa sakti kyonki woh uske ex ka Ghar hai bus Bahar sadak pe hi bachon se mil lo ki nahi Ab divorce ho gaye ab aap andar nahi aa sakte kya bache few hrs ke liye maa ko apne Ghar nahi Bula sakte

Not sure where this is coming out of, nonetheless, I may not be accurate or the right person. But here is the thing i have known and understood.

If the court orders supervised visits, then, the custodian, a guardian or a trusted person can accompany the child at a neutral location.

Most often, it is outside the confines of either parties' home. This gives the visiting parent quality time with the child without being subject to any awkwardness, verbal or physical exchanges and a neutral environment.

It is ALL about how the marriage turned out over a period of time and how either families have taken to it.

Marriage is between families and while the couple divorces and are able to move on, chances are that the families turn bitter for whatever reason. This creates a bitterness that get percolated inadvertently.

Infact, kids go to the visiting parent's house as well, if the individual parents and families agree.

The operating word is, Kids can come and go. May be even the parent. As long as there is no interference in the other's life and harmony in either house, I don't thing how the visits happen would matter.

We may see many parents take their children on activities, movies, playdates, visit places (with mutual consent).

I am not saying what Shruti is doing is right

I am saying there is precedent here in similar scenes that have been showcased in the past

Even with her connections with the Shahs her ex was there. Why hold the marriage there unnecessarily?

However Vanraj may have been he was shown to be affected by the wedding functions going on right in front of him. It seemed as much of an intentionally hurtful action as Shruti inviting Anupama to her ex's marriage

Okay. I see what you are trying to say here. Let me not defend what Anupama did after her divorce. Let's talk about the present. What Anupama did with the Shahs in her second wedding doesn't justify what Shruti is doing now. Also, if Anuj didn't tell Shruti, it is Anuj's fault. And yes, Anu should have told her too. I understand. But any of that doesn't justify what Shruti is doing. Even Adhya didn't tell Shruti for that matter. Plus Anupama wasn't hurting Shruti. Shruti shouldn't do this knowing how much Anuj and Anupama love each other.

Yes, it must have been hurtful for Vanraj. But Vanraj did no good to Anupama. He cheated on her and remarried himself. Anupama hasn't done Shruti any wrong.