Originally posted by: ItsmeAzra
I may get backlash for this,but I feel Vanraj is not completely wrong,Dimpy is definitely the mother of the child but doesn't mean that Shahs have no right on it!And it's not easy to accept another man's child and love it equally, now Titu might make big and tall promises of accepting the child and loving it but there are a 100 reasons to doubt him,he can turn his back on the child any time after marrying Dimpy,look at Upmaa,claims to love CA but does she really love her?No.Whereas Vanraj and fam will make sure to provide the best care for Dimpy and the kid.If Dimpy chooses to marry Titu,then will she even consider all the situations that her child might go through all this,mostly no.Amd Titu till kow only seems to be interested only in Dimpy not even thinkingabout the child angle,if he truly cared for her and then he should have stopped back after seeing her family's disapproval. Everything is not black and white and this matter is certainly not.On the surface Vanraj might look like the wrong one and Anupama & Dimpy the epitome of women empowerment, digging a little deeper will show that Dimpy & Anupama are not entirely right too.
But Vanraj and Leela only want the child to ruin it like the other Shah anmol ratnas. To an extent that they will discard Dimple once she delivers or make her life a living hell once the baby is born.
These wrong, isn't it?
Dimple is well within her rights to choose to move on. Anything away from the hellhole called Shah House, frankly.
Besides, the child is the responsibility of the parents. When one parent is still alive and fully willing to take responsibility, NONE can separate them. The mother (Dimple) is still very much alive and can decide what's best for her child.
Choti Anu and Dimple's child are false equivalences. What Anupama is doing with Choti Anu is in her senses and out of her own free will (which in this case, is negligence).
Besides, look at Anuj and Pakhi or Anuj and any of the Shah "kids". He has been excellent to the extent of them taking unreasonable liberties with him.
We cannot pre-empt and err on the side of caution. If she were to see such discrimination, she can independently decide (without the influence of emotional blackmail) what is best for the child.
Edited by Bodhianveshika - 1 years ago
18