Originally posted by: shubhK2308
There are many comments on this forum who showcase their hatred for Rupali, saying that she is a bad actor, bad dancer, why she only keeps getting awards, it's high time to change her etc, but then that's how the industry also works, people aren't able to distinguish you from your reel character.
If they dislike your character, you get hatred in real life also, same way,if people love your onscreen character, they will love the offscreen version of you as well.
So why is their opinion on acting dislike of character/hatred and not actual assessment and opinion about the actor?
Its not like they are attacking her family and character?
Can anupama/rupali andh bhakts envision even for a minute that maybe, just maybe, the acting might have actually deteriorated which is why people are having that opinion?
This comment is the height of irony to me, you take criticizing acting skills of an actor as hatred? What else should an actor be judged on if not for acting? In fact taking criticism of a character/actor as hatred is the definition of not being able to distinguish between real and reel life and getting too attached to a fictional character
Rupali is not getting any hatred in real life. Questioning her acting skills is not hatred. Yes there are many examples of actors getting hatred in real life, for example, the cersei actress and jofferey actor from game of thrones, the later got so much real life hatred he quit acting. They were ebing abused on all social media and real life on streets
But Rupali has never got any such hatred on any social media. Are anupama bhakts claiming an actors acting can never ever be critcized or else it will be labeled as hatred? Thats ridiculous
Edited by Harish111 - 2 years ago
10